Show simple item record

Knowledge of hepatitis C screening and management by internal medicine residents: trends over 2 years

dc.contributor.authorShehab, Thomas M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSonnad, Seema S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGebremariam, Achamyelehen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchoenfeld, Philip S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T22:24:53Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T22:24:53Z
dc.date.issued2002-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationShehab, Thomas M . ; Sonnad, Seema; Gebremariam, Achamyeleh; Schoenfeld, Philip (2002). "Knowledge of hepatitis C screening and management by internal medicine residents: trends over 2 years." The American Journal of Gastroenterology 97(5): 1216-1222. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75407>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-9270en_US
dc.identifier.issn1572-0241en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75407
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=12014731&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractOver 2 million people in the United States are infected with hepatitis C, and there has been an explosion in knowledge regarding this disease in the last decade. Internal medicine residents must be able to identify patients at risk for hepatitis C and institute appropriate diagnostic testing and referral of these patients. Methods : A survey regarding hepatitis C risk factors and the management of hepatitis C patients was administered on three occasions over 15 months (time 0, 1 month, and 15 months) to members of a large university-based internal medicine residency. Results : During the study period 59 residents completed all three surveys. Less than half of the residents (39%) ask patients about hepatitis C risk factors. Only 58% reported that they would refer a hepatitis C antibody positive patient with elevated liver enzymes to a subspecialist on the initial survey. The residents who did not refer patients cited low response rates, high side-effect profiles, and the high cost of therapy as reasons for not referring the patient. There was significant improvement (58% vs 78%, p < 0.01 ) in the rate of patient referral during the 15-month study period but no substantial improvement in the other knowledge deficits. Conclusions : The knowledge base of the internal medicine residents about hepatitis C screening and management is suboptimal. New, more effective hepatitis C education programs for internal medicine residents should be initiated.en_US
dc.format.extent116203 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights2002 by Am. Coll. of Gastroenterologyen_US
dc.titleKnowledge of hepatitis C screening and management by internal medicine residents: trends over 2 yearsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCHOICES (Consortium for Health Outcomes Innovation and Cost-Effectiveness Studies), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenter for Excellence in Health Services Research, VAMC, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid12014731en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75407/1/j.1572-0241.2002.05708.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05708.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe American Journal of Gastroenterologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlter M.J., Kruszon-Moran D., Nainan O.V., et al. The prevalence of Hepatitis C virus infection in the United States, 1988 through 1994. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 556 – 562.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePowell D.W. National Institutes of Health consensus development conference panel statement: Management of hepatitis C. Hepatology 1997; 26 ( suppl 1 ): 2S – 10S.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShehab T.M., Sonnad S.S., Jeffries M., et al. Current practice patterns of primary care physicians in the management of patients with hepatitis C. Hepatology 1999; 30: 794 – 800.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaeian K., Rochling F.A., Burke R., et al. Faculty and trainee knowledge of hepatitis C infection at a tertiary care medical center. WMJ 1998; 97: 43 – 46.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBorum M.L. Breast cancer surveillance: Ambulatory care focus in residency may influence practice patterns. Am J Med Sci 1996; 312: 123 – 125.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcPhee S.J., Richard R.J., Solkowitz S.N. Performance of cancer screening in a university internal medicine practice: Comparison with the 1980 American Cancer Society guidelines. J Gen Intern Med 1986; 1: 275 – 281.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLynch G.R., Prout M.N. Screening for cancer by residents in an internal medicine program. Med Educ 1986; 61: 387 – 393.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBorum M.L. Cancer screening in women by internal medicine resident physicians. South Med J 1997; 90: 1101 – 1105.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSharma V.K., Corder F.A., Raufman J.P., et al. Survey of internal medicine residents’ use of the fecal occult blood test and their understanding of colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 2068 – 2073.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYarnold P.R., Martin G.J., Feinglass J., et al. First-year residents’ caring, medical knowledge, and clinical judgement in relation to laboratory utilization. Acad Med 1994; 69: 996 – 998.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBernard A.M., Anderson L., Cook C.B., et al. What do internal medicine residents need to know to enhance their diabetes care?. Diabetes Care 1999; 22: 661 – 666.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReichert S., Simon T., Halm E.A. Physicians’ attitudes about prescribing and knowledge of the costs of common medications. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 2799 – 2803.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSharara A.I., Hunt C.M., Hamilton J.D. Hepatitis C. Ann Intern Med 1996; 125: 658 – 668.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Recommendations for prevention and control of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and HCV-related chronic disease. MMWR Recomm Rep 1998; 47 ( RR-19 ): 1 – 39.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConry-Cantilena C., VanRaden M., Gibble J., et al. Routes of infection, viremia, and liver disease in blood donors found to have hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 1691 – 1696.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLok A.S.F., Gunaratnum N.T. Diagnosis of hepatitis C. Hepatology 1997; 26 ( suppl 1 ): 48S – 56S.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGretch D.R. Diagnostic tests for hepatitis C. Hepatology 1997; 26 ( suppl 1 ): 43S – 47S.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis D., O'Brien M.A.T., Freemantle N., et al. Impact of formal continuing medical education: Do conferences, workshops, rounds and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes?. JAMA 1999; 282: 867 – 874.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis D.A., Thomson M.A., Oxman A.D., et al. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA 1995; 274: 700 – 705.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMadan A.K., Caruso B.A., Lopes J.E., et al. Comparison of simulated patient and didactic methods of teaching HIV risk factors assessment to medical residents. Am J Prev Med 1998; 15: 114 – 119.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.