View Item 

Show simple item record

Phylogenetic relationships in the subgenus Mus ( genus Mus, family Muridae, subfamily Murinae): examining gene trees and species trees

dc.contributor.authorTucker, Priscilla K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSandstedt, Sara A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLundrigan, Barbara L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T22:25:23Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T22:25:23Z
dc.date.issued2005-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationTUCKER, PRISCILLA K.; SANDSTEDT, SARA A.; LUNDRIGAN, BARBARA L. (2005). "Phylogenetic relationships in the subgenus Mus ( genus Mus, family Muridae, subfamily Murinae): examining gene trees and species trees." Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 84(3): 653-662. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75415>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0024-4066en_US
dc.identifier.issn1095-8312en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75415
dc.format.extent131270 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Science Ltden_US
dc.rights2005 The Linnean Society of Londonen_US
dc.subject.otherLikelihooden_US
dc.subject.otherMtDNAen_US
dc.subject.otherNuclear Genesen_US
dc.subject.otherParsimonyen_US
dc.subject.otherPhylogenyen_US
dc.titlePhylogenetic relationships in the subgenus Mus ( genus Mus, family Muridae, subfamily Murinae): examining gene trees and species treesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeneticsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMuseum of Zoology and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109–1079, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMichigan State University Museum and Department of Zoology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824–1045, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75415/1/j.1095-8312.2005.00462.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00462.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceBiological Journal of the Linnean Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAasland R, Gibson TJ, Stewart AF. 1995. The Phd finger-implications for chromatin-mediated transcriptional regulation. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 20: 56 – 59.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdkins RM, Walton AH, Honeycutt RL. 2003. Higher-level systematics of rodents and divergence time estimates based on two congruent nuclear genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 26: 409 – 420.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAuffray J-C, Orth A, Catalan J, Gonzalez J-P, Desmarais E, Bonhomme F. 2003. Phylogenetic position and description of a new species of subgenus Mus (Rodentia, Mammalia) from Thailand. Zoologica Scripta 32: 119 – 127.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerry RJ, Scriven PN. 2005. The house mouse: a model and motor for evolutionary understanding. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 84: 335 – 347.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBonhomme F, Catalan J, Britton-Davidian J, Chapman VM, Moriwaki K, Nevo E, Thaler L. 1984. Biochemical diversity and evolution in the genus Mus. Biochemical Genetics 22: 275 – 303.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoursot P, Auffray JC, Britton-Davidian J, Bonhomme F. 1993. The evolution of house mice. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 119 – 152.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBremer K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795 – 803.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBremer K. 1994. Branch support and clade stability. Cladistics 10: 295 – 304.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCatzeflis FM, Denys C. 1992. The African Nannomys (Muridae): An early offshoot from the Mus lineage. Evidence from scDNA hybridization experiments and compared morphology. Israel Journal of Zoology 38: 219 – 231.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChevret P, Granjon J, Duplantier J, Denys C, Catzeflis F. 1994. Molecular phylogeny of the Praomys complex (Rodentia: Murinae): a study based on DNA/DNA hybridization experiments. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 112: 425 – 442.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChevret P, Jenkins P, Catzeflis F. 2003. Evolutionary systematics of the Indian mouse Mus famulus Bonhote, 1898: molecular (DNA/DNA hybridization and 12S rRNA sequences) and morphological evidence. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 137: 385 – 401.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChevret P, Veyrunes F, Britton-Davidian J. 2005. Molecular phylogeny of the genus Mus (Rodentia: Murinae) based on mitochondrial and nuclear data. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 84: 417 – 427.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCunningham CW. 1997. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 733 – 740.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeBry RW. 2003. Identifying conflicting signal in a multigene analysis reveals a highly resolved tree: the phylogeny of Rodentia (Mammalia). Systematic Biology 52: 604 – 617.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarris JS, Kallersjo M, Kluge AG, Bult C. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315 – 319.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerris SD, Sage RD, Huang C-M, Nielsen JT, Ritte U, Wilson AC. 1983. Flow of mitochondrial DNA across a species boundary. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 80: 2290 – 2294.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFort P, Bonhomme F, Darlu P, Piechaczyk M, Jeanteur P, Thaler L. 1984. Clonal divergence of mitochondrial DNA versus population evolution of nuclear genome. Evolutionary Theory 7: 81 – 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuÉnet J-L, Bonhomme F. 2003. Wild mice: an ever-increasing contribution to a popular mammalian model. Trends in Genetics 19: 24 – 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuchon D, Madsen O, Sibbald MJJB, Ament K, Stanhope MJ, Catzeflis F, DeJong WW, Douzery EJP. 2002. Rodent phylogeny and a timescale for the evolution of Glires: evidence from an extensive taxon sampling using three nuclear genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19: 1053 – 1065.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MR BAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754 – 755.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJansa SA, Weksler M. 2004. Phylogeny of muroid rodents: relationships within and among major lineages as determined by IRBP gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31: 256 – 276.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJenkins NA, Copeland NG, Taylor BA, Lee BK. 1982. Organization, distribution and stability of endogenous ecotropic murine leukemia virus DNA sequence in chromosomes of Mus musculus. Journal of Virology 43: 26 – 36.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJouvin-Marche E, Cuddihy A, Butler S, Hansen JN, Fitch WM, Rudikoff S. 1988. Modern evolution of a single-copy gene: The immunoglobulin C k locus in wild mice. Molecular Biology and Evolution 5: 500 – 511.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLundrigan BL, Jansa SA, Tucker PK. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Mus, based on paternally, maternally and biparentally inherited characters. Systematic Biology 51: 410 – 431.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLundrigan B, Tucker PK. 1994. Tracing paternal ancestry in mice, using the Y-linked, sex-determining locus, Sry. Molecular Biology and Evolution 11: 483 – 492.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarshall JT. 1981. Taxonomy. In: Foster HL, Small JD, Fox JG, eds. The mouse in biochemical research, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press, 17 – 26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMickevich MF, Farris JS. 1981. The implications of congruence in Menidia. Systematic Zoology 30: 351 – 370.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMusser GG, Carleton MD. 1993. Family Muridae. In: Wilson DE, Reeder DM, eds. Mammal species of the world. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 510 – 755.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePosada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817 – 818.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrager EM, Orrego C, Sage RD. 1998. Genetic variation and phylogeography of Central Asian and other house mice, including a major new mitochondrial lineage in Yemen. Genetics 150: 835 – 861.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrager EM, Tichy H, Sage RD. 1996. Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation in the eastern house mouse, Mus musculus: Comparison with other house mice and report of a 75-bp tandem repeat. Genetics 142: 427 – 446.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRambaut A, Drummond AJ. 2003. Tracer v1. 0. http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk/en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSage RD. 1981. Wild mice. In: Foster HL, Small JD, Fox JG, eds. The mouse in biochemical research, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press, 39 – 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaiki RK, Scharf S, Faloona F, Mullis KB, Horn GT, Erlich HA, Arnheim N. 1985. Enzymatic amplification of b-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science 230: 1350 – 1354.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSandstedt S, Tucker PK. 2004. Evolutionary strata on the X chromosome in the mouse genus Mus. Genome Research 14: 267 – 272.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScott DM, Ehrmann IE, Ellis PS, Agulnik AI, Bishop CE, Simpson E, Mitchell MJ. 1995. Identification of a mouse male-specific transplantation antigen, H-Y. Nature 376: 695 – 698.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShe JX, Bonhomme F, Boursot P, Thaler L, Catzeflis F. 1990. Molecular phylogenies in the genus Mus: Comparative analysis of electrophoretic, scnDNA hybridization, and mtDNA RFLP data. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 41: 83 – 103.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShimodaira H, Hasegawa M. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 1114 – 1116.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSorenson MD. 1999. Treerot, Version 2. Boston: Boston University.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSourrouille P, Hanni C, Ruedi M, Catzeflis FM. 1995. Molecular systematics of Mus crociduroides, an endemic mouse of Sumatra (Muridae: Rodentia). Mammalia 59: 91 – 102.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSuzuki H, Kurihara Y. 1994. Genetic variation of ribosomal RNA in the house mouse, Mus musculus. In: Moriwaki K, Shiroishi T, Yonekawa H, eds. Genetics in wild mice: its application to biomedical research. Tokyo: Japan Science Society Press, 107 – 119.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwofford DL. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTakeuchi T, Yamazaki Y, Katohfukui Y, Tsuchiya R, Kondo S, Motoyama J, Higashinakagawa T. 1995. Gene trap capture of a novel mouse gene, Jumonji, required for neural-tube formation. Genes and Development 9: 1211 – 1222.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. 1997. The CLUSTAL windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 4876 – 4888.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang W, Meadows LR, den Haan JMM, Sherman NE, Chen Y, Blokland E, Shabanowitz J, Agulnik AI, Hendrickson RC, Bishop CE, Hunt DF, Goulmy E, Engelhard VH. 1995. Human H-Y: a male-specific histocompatibility antigen derived from the SMCY protein. Science 269: 1588 – 1590.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYonekawa H, Moriwaki K, Gotoh O, Miyashita N, Matsushima Y, Shi L, Cho WS, Zhen X, Tagashira Y. 1988. Hybrid origin of Japanese mice ‘ Mus musculus molossinus ’: Evidence from restriction analysis of mitochondrial DNA. Molecular Biology and Evolution 5: 63 – 78.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1095-8312.2005.00462.x.pdf
Size:
128.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.