View Item 

Show simple item record

A Comparison of Criminal Sexual Conduct Defendants Based on Victim Age*

dc.contributor.authorPoortinga, Ernesten_US
dc.contributor.authorLemmen, Craigen_US
dc.contributor.authorMajeske, Karlen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T22:26:13Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T22:26:13Z
dc.date.issued2007-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationPoortinga, Ernest; Lemmen, Craig; Majeske, Karl (2007). "A Comparison of Criminal Sexual Conduct Defendants Based on Victim Age*." Journal of Forensic Sciences 52(6): 1372-1375. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75428>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-1198en_US
dc.identifier.issn1556-4029en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75428
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=18093067&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent67746 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights2007 American Academy of Forensic Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherForensic Psychiatryen_US
dc.subject.otherSex Offenderen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychosisen_US
dc.subject.otherLogistic Regressionen_US
dc.subject.otherVictim Ageen_US
dc.titleA Comparison of Criminal Sexual Conduct Defendants Based on Victim Age*en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelScience (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMichigan Center for Forensic Psychiatry and University of Michigan Department of Psychiatry, PO Box 2060, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSchool of Business Administration, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid18093067en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75428/1/j.1556-4029.2007.00571.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00571.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Forensic Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKafka M. The monoamine hypothesis for the pathophysiology of paraphilic disorders: an update. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2003; 1989: 86 – 94.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceApfelberg B, Sugar C, Pfefer A. A psychiatric study of 250 sex offenders. Am J Psychiatry 1944; 100: 762 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrancale R, Ellis A, Doorbar R. Psychiatric and psychological investigations of convicted sex offenders: a summary report. Am J Psychiatry 1952; 109: 17 – 21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrancale R, MacNeil D, Vuocolo A. Profile of the New Jersey sex offender: a statistical study of 1206 male sex offenders. Welfare Rep 1965; 16: 3 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrossch J, Bromberg W. The sex offender: a psychiatric study. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1939; 9: 761 – 76.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrentky R, Burgess A, editors. Forensic management of sexual offenders. New York, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2000; 28 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMotiuk L, Porporino F. The prevalence, nature, and severity of mental health problems among federal male inmates in Canadian penitentiaries (Report No. 24). Ottawa, Canada: Correctional Services of Canada, 1992.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchneider B. Validation of sex offender subtypes through personality assessment. In: Prentkey R, editor. Assessment of subtypes of rapists and pedophiles: implications for treatment. Proceedings of Annual Symposium of American Psychological Association, Aug 24–28, 1981, Los Angeles, CA. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1981.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGebhard P, Gagnon J, Pomeroy W, Christenson C. Sex offenders: an analysis of types. New York: Harper and Rowe, 1965.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRada R. Clinical aspects of the rapist. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1978.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrentky R. The neurochemistry and neuroendocrinology of sexual aggression: review and metatheory. In: Farrington D, Gunn J, editors. Aggression and dangerousness. New York: Wiley, 1985; 7 – 55.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLangstrom N, Sjostedt G, Grann M. Psychiatric disorders and recidivism in sexual offenders. Sex Abuse 2004; 16: 139 – 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcElroy SL, Soutullo CA, Taylor P, Nelson EB, Beckman DA, Brusman LA, et al. Psychiatric features of 36 men convicted of sexual offences. J Clin Psychiatry 1999; 60: 414 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBogaerts S, Vervaeke G, Goethals J. A comparison of relational attitude and personality disorders in the explanation of child molestation. Sex Abuse 2004; 16: 37 – 47.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMichigan Compiled Laws. MCL Sec 750.520. 2006.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMichigan Compiled Laws MCL section 330.1400a. 2006.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Publishing, 1994.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCochrane RE, Grisso T, Frederick RI. The relationship between criminal charges, diagnoses and psycholegal opinions among federal pretrial defendants. Behav Sci Law 2001; 19: 565 – 82.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKalichman SC. Psychopathology and personality characteristics of criminal sex offenders as a function of victim age. Arch Sex Behav 1991; 20: 187 – 97.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFirestone P, Dixon KL, Nunes KL, Bradford JM. A comparison of incest offenders based on victim age. J Am Academy Psychiatry Law 2005; 33: 223 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlanchard R, Barbaree H, Bogaert A, Dickey R, Klassen P, Kuban M, Zucker K. Fraternal birth order and sexual orientation of pedophiles. Arch Sex Behav 2000; 29: 463 – 78.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeighbors HW, Trierweiler SJ, Ford BC, Muroff JR. Racial differences in DSM diagnosis using a semi-structured instrument: the importance of clinical judgment in the diagnosis of African-Americans. J Health Soc Behav 2003; 44 ( 3 ): 237 – 56.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1556-4029.2007.00571.x.pdf
Size:
66.15KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.