Show simple item record

A new stopping rule for surveys

dc.contributor.authorWagner, James R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRaghunathan, Trivellore E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-02T19:50:57Z
dc.date.available2011-03-01T16:26:47Zen_US
dc.date.issued2010-04-30en_US
dc.identifier.citationWagner, James; Raghunathan, Trivellore E. (2010). "A new stopping rule for surveys." Statistics in Medicine 29(9): 1014-1024. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75787>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0277-6715en_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0258en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75787
dc.description.abstractNon-response is a problem for most surveys. In the sample design, non-response is often dealt with by setting a target response rate and inflating the sample size so that the desired number of interviews is reached. The decision to stop data collection is based largely on meeting the target response rate. A recent article by Rao, Glickman, and Glynn (RGG) suggests rules for stopping that are based on the survey data collected for the current set of respondents. Two of their rules compare estimates from fully imputed data where the imputations are based on a subset of early responders to fully imputed data where the imputations are based on the combined set of early and late responders. If these two estimates are different, then late responders are changing the estimate of interest. The present article develops a new rule for when to stop collecting data in a sample survey. The rule attempts to use complete interview data as well as covariates available on non-responders to determine when the probability that collecting additional data will change the survey estimate is sufficiently low to justify stopping data collection. The rule is compared with that of RGG using simulations and then is implemented using data from a real survey. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.format.extent145494 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.subject.otherMathematics and Statisticsen_US
dc.titleA new stopping rule for surveysen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelStatistics and Numeric Dataen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, U.S.A. ; University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research, G373 Perry, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, U.S.A.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid20131311en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75787/1/3834_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/sim.3834en_US
dc.identifier.sourceStatistics in Medicineen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.