Puerto Rico and the Promise of United States Citizenship: Struggles around Status in a New Empire, 1898-1917.
dc.contributor.author | Erman, Samuel C. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-06-03T15:44:34Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2010-06-03T15:44:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | en_US |
dc.date.submitted | en_US | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75920 | |
dc.description.abstract | By invading and annexing Puerto Rico and other Spanish lands in 1898-1899, the United States took an imperial turn that unsettled its constitutional order. This dissertation traces responses by two groups—one within the U.S. government and another comprised of Puerto Ricans—to the legal uncertainty that reigned until Congress extended U.S. citizenship to “citizens of Porto Rico” in 1917. It also reconstructs the social and legal terrain surrounding key legal actions: the Treaty of Paris, the Foraker Act, the Insular Cases, and the Jones Act. For representatives of the U.S. government—federal judges, elected officials, and appointed administrators—U.S occupation of the island imposed hard choices between the exigencies of imperial governance and what they saw as adherence to constitutional norms. For a group of Puerto Ricans, mostly male politicians, competing federal actors and priorities provided openings to advance individual and collective claims to status. This study traces the political and legal activities of officials and claimants as well as the metaphors they drew upon to explain their claims. U.S. officials characteristically expressed fidelity to legal concepts, alleged Anglo-Saxon superiority, and contrasted their actions with Spanish imperial misrule. Rather than reject racial hierarchies in U.S. imperialist and eugenic thought, Puerto Rican actors often claimed favorable positions within those hierarchies through Reconstruction metaphors and self-affirming historical accounts of their Spanish-era political participation. Close study of Puerto Ricans who sought citizenship or self-government in this period, especially the unusual grouping of claimants involved in Gonzales v. Williams (1904), reveals that existing accounts of the Insular Cases overemphasize the coherence of these decisions. The oft-cited Downes v. Bidwell (1901), moreover, should be read alongside Gonzales. For two decades the Court declined to completely embrace the doctrinal innovations or delineate the implications for Puerto Rican rights of the Downes ruling. The Insular Cases developed slowly and ambiguously, transforming U.S. citizenship for Puerto Ricans from a status that courts might recognize in individual islanders and that might bring them full constitutional protections and eventual U.S. statehood, into a largely empty vessel, achievable only through Congress and heralding indefinite colonialism. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 1866850 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 1373 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Citizenship | en_US |
dc.subject | Puerto Rico | en_US |
dc.subject | Constitutional History | en_US |
dc.subject | Insular Cases | en_US |
dc.subject | American Political Development | en_US |
dc.subject | Gonzales V. Williams | en_US |
dc.title | Puerto Rico and the Promise of United States Citizenship: Struggles around Status in a New Empire, 1898-1917. | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | PhD | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | American Culture | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Hoffnung-Garskof, Jesse E. | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Scott, Rebecca J. | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Blumenthal, Susanna | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Jones, Martha | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Primus, Richard A. | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Law and Legal Studies | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | American and Canadian Studies | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | History (General) | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Latin American and Caribbean Studies | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Government, Politics and Law | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Humanities | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75920/1/samerman_1.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.