Show simple item record

Understanding the variation in treatment intensity among patients with early stage bladder cancer

dc.contributor.authorHollingsworth, John M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Yunen_US
dc.contributor.authorKrein, Sarah L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorYe, Zaojunen_US
dc.contributor.authorHollenbeck, Brent K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-02T17:47:05Z
dc.date.available2011-03-01T16:26:47Zen_US
dc.date.issued2010-08-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationHollingsworth, John M.; Zhang, Yun; Krein, Sarah L.; Ye, Zaojun; Hollenbeck, Brent K. (2010). "Understanding the variation in treatment intensity among patients with early stage bladder cancer." Cancer 116(15): 3587-3594. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/77513>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0008-543Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/77513
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Given the uncertainty surrounding the optimal management for early stage bladder cancer, physicians vary in how they approach the disease. The authors of this report linked cancer registry data with medical claims to identify the sources of variation and opportunities for improving the value of cancer care. METHODS: By using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database (1992-2005), patients with early stage bladder cancer were abstracted (n = 18,276). The primary outcome was the intensity of initial treatment that patients received, as measured by all Medicare payments for bladder cancer incurred in the 2 years after diagnosis. Multilevel models were fitted to partition the variation in treatment intensity attributable to patient versus provider factors, and the potential savings to Medicare from reducing the physician contribution were estimated. RESULTS: Provider factors accounted for 9.2% of the variation in treatment intensity. Increasing provider treatment intensity did not correlate with improved cancer-specific survival ( P = .07), but it was associated with the subsequent receipt of major interventions, including radical cystectomy ( P < .001). If provider-level variation was reduced and clinical practice was aligned with that of physicians who performed in the 25th percentile of treatment intensity, then total payments made for the average patient could be lowered by 18.6%, saving Medicare $18.7 million annually. CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicated that a substantial amount of the variation in initial treatment intensity for early stage bladder cancer is driven by the physician. Furthermore, a more intensive practice style was not associated with improved cancer-specific survival or the avoidance of major interventions. Therefore, interventions aimed at reducing between-provider differences may improve the value of cancer care. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.en_US
dc.format.extent279150 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherCancer Research, Oncology and Pathologyen_US
dc.titleUnderstanding the variation in treatment intensity among patients with early stage bladder canceren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumRobert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholar Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Department of Urology, Division of Health Services Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Urology, Division of Health Services Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumVeterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Center for Practice Management and Outcomes Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Urology, Division of Health Services Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Urology, Division of Health Services Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Michigan Surgical Collaborative for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Fax: (734) 232-2400 ; Department of Urology, The University of Michigan, Room 1032B, Michigan House, 2301 Commonwealth Boulevard, Ann Arbor, MI 48105-2967en_US
dc.identifier.pmid20564128en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/77513/1/25221_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncr.25221en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCanceren_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.