Show simple item record

Consensus Statement on the Terminology and Classification of Central Neck Dissection for Thyroid Cancer

dc.contributor.authorCarty, Sally E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCooper, David S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDoherty, Gerard M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDuh, Quan-Yangen_US
dc.contributor.authorKloos, Richard T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMandel, Susan J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRandolph, Gregory W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorStack, Brendan C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSteward, David L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTerris, David J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Geoffrey B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTufano, Ralph P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTuttle, R. Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorUdelsman, Robert A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-14T14:17:13Z
dc.date.available2010-10-14T14:17:13Z
dc.date.issued2009-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationCarty, Sally E.; Cooper, David S.; Doherty, Gerard M.; Duh, Quan-Yang; Kloos, Richard T.; Mandel, Susan J.; Randolph, Gregory W.; Stack, Brendan C.; Steward, David L.; Terris, David J.; Thompson, Geoffrey B.; Tufano, Ralph P.; Tuttle, R. Michael; Udelsman, Robert (2009/10/27). "Consensus Statement on the Terminology and Classification of Central Neck Dissection for Thyroid Cancer." Thyroid, 19(11): 1153-1158 <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/78103>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1050-7256en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/78103
dc.description.abstractBackground: The primary goals of this interdisciplinary consensus statement are to review the relevant anatomy of the central neck compartment, to identify the nodal subgroups within the central compartment commonly involved in thyroid cancer, and to define a consistent terminology relevant to the central compartment neck dissection. Summary: The most commonly involved central lymph nodes in thyroid carcinoma are the prelaryngeal (Delphian), pretracheal, and the right and left paratracheal nodal basins. A central neck dissection includes comprehensive, compartment-oriented removal of the prelaryngeal and pretracheal nodes and at least one paratracheal lymph node basin. A designation should be made as to whether a unilateral or bilateral dissection is performed and on which side (left or right) in unilateral cases. Lymph node plucking or berry picking implies removal only of the clinically involved nodes rather than a complete nodal group within the compartment and is not recommended. A therapeutic central compartment neck dissection implies that nodal metastasis is apparent clinically (preoperatively or intraoperatively) or by imaging (clinically N1a). A prophylactic/elective central compartment dissection implies nodal metastasis is not detected clinically or by imaging (clinically N0). Conclusion: Central neck dissection at a minimum should consist of removal of the prelaryngeal, pretracheal, and paratracheal lymph nodes. The description of a central neck dissection should include both the indication (therapeutic vs. prophylactic/elective) and the extent of the dissection (unilateral or bilateral).en_US
dc.format.extent323585 bytes
dc.format.extent3100 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Inc.en_US
dc.titleConsensus Statement on the Terminology and Classification of Central Neck Dissection for Thyroid Canceren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid19860578en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/78103/1/thy.2009.0159.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/thy.2009.0159en_US
dc.identifier.sourceThyroiden_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.