Show simple item record

A recommended scale for cognitive screening in clinical trials of Parkinson's disease

dc.contributor.authorChou, Kelvin L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAmick, Melissa M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBrandt, Jasonen_US
dc.contributor.authorCamicioli, Richarden_US
dc.contributor.authorFrei, Karenen_US
dc.contributor.authorGitelman, Darrenen_US
dc.contributor.authorGoldman, Jenniferen_US
dc.contributor.authorGrowdon, Johnen_US
dc.contributor.authorHurtig, Howard I.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLevin, Bonnieen_US
dc.contributor.authorLitvan, Ireneen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarsh, Lauraen_US
dc.contributor.authorSimuni, Tanyaen_US
dc.contributor.authorTröster, Alexander I.en_US
dc.contributor.authorUc, Ergun Y.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-11-18T20:26:33Z
dc.date.available2011-03-01T16:26:45Zen_US
dc.date.issued2010-11-15en_US
dc.identifier.citationChou, Kelvin L.; Amick, Melissa M.; Brandt, Jason; Camicioli, Richard; Frei, Karen; Gitelman, Darren; Goldman, Jennifer; Growdon, John; Hurtig, Howard I.; Levin, Bonnie; Litvan, Irene; Marsh, Laura; Simuni, Tanya; TrÖster, Alexander I.; Uc, Ergun Y. (2010). "A recommended scale for cognitive screening in clinical trials of Parkinson's disease." Movement Disorders 25(15): 2501-2507. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/78295>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0885-3185en_US
dc.identifier.issn1531-8257en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/78295
dc.description.abstractCognitive impairment is common in Parkinson's disease (PD). There is a critical need for a brief, standard cognitive screening measure for use in PD trials whose primary focus is not on cognition. The Parkinson Study Group (PSG) Cognitive/Psychiatric Working Group formed a Task Force to make recommendations for a cognitive scale that could screen for dementia and mild cognitive impairment in clinical trials of PD where cognition is not the primary outcome. This Task Force conducted a systematic literature search for cognitive assessments previously used in a PD population. Scales were then evaluated for their appropriateness to screen for cognitive deficits in clinical trials, including brief administration time (<15 minutes), assessment of the major cognitive domains, and potential to detect subtle cognitive impairment in PD. Five scales of global cognition met the predetermined screening criteria and were considered for review. Based on the Task Force's evaluation criteria the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), appeared to be the most suitable measure. This Task Force recommends consideration of the MoCA as a minimum cognitive screening measure in clinical trials of PD where cognitive performance is not the primary outcome measure. The MoCA still requires further study of its diagnostic utility in PD populations but appears to be the most appropriate measure among the currently available brief cognitive assessments. Widespread adoption of a single instrument such as the MoCA in clinical trials can improve comparability between research studies on PD. © 2010 Movement Disorder Societyen_US
dc.format.extent91479 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherNeurologyen_US
dc.subject.otherNeuroscienceen_US
dc.titleA recommended scale for cognitive screening in clinical trials of Parkinson's diseaseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA ; University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, SPC 5316, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5316en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherVA Boston Healthcare System and Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartments of Psychiatry and Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canadaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe Parkinson's and Movement Disorders Institute, Fountain Valley, California, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartments of Neurology and Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepratment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Neurology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherParkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Center and Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Neurology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA ; Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Iowa City, Iowa, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid20878991en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/78295/1/23362_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/mds.23362en_US
dc.identifier.sourceMovement Disordersen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.