Show simple item record

Patient satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction

dc.contributor.authorMcCarthy, Colleen M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKlassen, Anne F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCano, Stefan J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorScott, Amieen_US
dc.contributor.authorVanLaeken, Nancyen_US
dc.contributor.authorLennox, Peter A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAlderman, Amy K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMehrara, Babak J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDisa, Joseph J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCordeiro, Peter G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPusic, Andrea L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-04T16:22:02Z
dc.date.available2011-03-01T16:26:40Zen_US
dc.date.issued2010-12-15en_US
dc.identifier.citationMcCarthy, Colleen M.; Klassen, Anne F.; Cano, Stefan J.; Scott, Amie; VanLaeken, Nancy; Lennox, Peter A.; Alderman, Amy K.; Mehrara, Babak J.; Disa, Joseph J.; Cordeiro, Peter G.; Pusic, Andrea L. (2010). "Patient satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction." Cancer 116(24): 5584-5591. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/78475>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0008-543Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/78475
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND. At a time when the safety and effectiveness of breast implants remains under close scrutiny, it is important to provide reliable and valid evidence regarding patient outcomes. In the setting of postmastectomy reconstruction, patient satisfaction and quality of life may be the most significant outcome variables when evaluating surgical success. The objective of the current study was to identify predictors of patient satisfaction with breast appearance, including implant type, in a large sample of women who underwent breast reconstruction surgery using implants. METHODS. A multicenter, cross-sectional study design was used. A total of 672 women who had completed postmastectomy, implant-based reconstruction at 1 of 3 centers in North America were asked to complete the BREAST-Q (Reconstruction Module). Multivariate linear regression modeling was performed. RESULTS. Completed questionnaire data were available for 482 of the 672 patients. In 176 women, silicone implants were placed and in 306, saline implants were used. The multivariate model confirmed that patients' satisfaction with their breasts was significantly higher in patients with silicone implants ( P = .016). The receipt of postmastectomy radiotherapy was found to have a significant, negative effect on breast satisfaction ( P <.000) in both silicone and saline implant recipients. In addition, for women who received either silicone or saline implants, satisfaction diminished over time ( P = .017). CONCLUSIONS. In the setting of postmastectomy reconstruction, patients who received silicone breast implants reported significantly higher satisfaction with the results of reconstruction than those who received saline implants. This information can be used to optimize shared medical decision-making by providing patients with realistic postoperative expectations. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.en_US
dc.format.extent247382 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherCancer Research, Oncology and Pathologyen_US
dc.titlePatient satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstructionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York ; Fax: (212) 717-3677 ; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275York Avenue, MRI 1007, New York, NY 10065en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartments of Pediatrics and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canadaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBrain Repair & Rehabilitation, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdomen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New Yorken_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canadaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canadaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New Yorken_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New Yorken_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New Yorken_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New Yorken_US
dc.identifier.pmid21136577en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/78475/1/25552_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncr.25552en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCanceren_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.