Show simple item record

Geographic variation in hypertension prevalence among blacks and whites: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis

dc.contributor.authorKershaw, KN
dc.contributor.authorDiez Roux, Ana V.
dc.contributor.authorCarnethon, Mercedes R
dc.contributor.authorDarwin, C
dc.contributor.authorGoff, D. C. Jr.
dc.contributor.authorPost, Wendy
dc.contributor.authorSchreiner, Pamela J.
dc.contributor.authorWatson, K
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-05T15:52:34Z
dc.date.available2011-01-05T15:52:34Z
dc.date.issued2010-01
dc.identifier.citationAm J Hypertens. 2010 Jan;23(1):46-53. Epub 2009 Nov 12. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/78514>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/78514
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Many studies have examined differences in hypertension across race/ethnic groups but few have evaluated differences within groups. METHODS: We investigated within-group geographic variations in hypertension prevalence among 3,322 black and white participants of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Place of birth and place of residence were included in multivariate Poisson regression analyses. RESULTS: Blacks born in southern states were 1.11 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02, 1.23) times more likely to be hypertensive than non-southern states after adjusting for age and sex. Findings were similar, though not statistically significant, for whites (prevalence ratio (PR): 1.15, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.35). Blacks and whites living in Forsyth (blacks, PR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.42; whites, PR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.60) and Baltimore (blacks, PR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.31; whites, PR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.47) were also significantly more likely to be hypertensive than those living in Chicago after adjusting for age and sex. Among blacks, those living in New York were also significantly more likely to be hypertensive. Geographic heterogeneity was partially explained by socioeconomic indicators, neighborhood characteristics or hypertension risk factors. There was also evidence of substantial heterogeneity in black-white differences depending on which geographic groups were compared (ranging from 82 to 13% higher prevalence in blacks compared with whites).en_US
dc.format.extent138280 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleGeographic variation in hypertension prevalence among blacks and whites: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.contributor.affiliationumEpidemiology, Department ofen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/78514/1/KershawDiezRoux2010_AmJHTN.pdf
dc.owningcollnameEpidemiology, Department of (SPH)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.