Show simple item record

Children's Development of Knowledge and Beliefs about English Likes(s).

dc.contributor.authorOdato, Christopher V.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-18T16:04:07Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2011-01-18T16:04:07Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.date.submitteden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/78739
dc.description.abstractMuch recent research has described the development of innovative functions of 'like' as a discourse marker (Like they’re trying to be discreet about it) or discourse particle ('Maybe it’s like a girl thing') and as a quotative marker ('He’s like “I don’t want to work until later”'). Comparatively little is known about how speakers acquire this variable. This dissertation consists of two studies examining young children’s use of, and knowledge and beliefs about, 'like' to better understand how it is incorporated into maturing linguistic systems. The first study examines children’s use of 'like' in spontaneous speech. Data come from recorded interactions between pairs of children ages 3-6 and 10. Children as young as four used 'like' as a discourse marker/particle and as a quotative. Rather than mirroring adults’ speech, in which 'like' is used most frequently clause-initially, young children used 'like' primarily as a discourse particle attached to syntactic constituents smaller than the sentence. Children began using 'like' in different syntactic positions in the historical order in which 'like' began to be used in those positions. The second study comprises two experiments assessing children’s knowledge of grammatical constraints on 'like' and social beliefs about 'like'. Fifty-seven children ages 5-10 listened to sentences containing a use of 'like' that is observed in adults’ speech, 'like' in a position from which it is categorically absent in adults’ speech, or no 'like' at all. In Task 1 participants made acceptability judgments; in Task 2 they decided whether sentences were more likely produced by a female or male speaker. Children of all ages exhibited awareness of grammatical constraints on 'like'. Older children, particularly girls, demonstrated a prescriptive stance toward 'like'. Nine- and ten-year-olds attributed sentences to a female speaker more frequently if they contained 'like'. The results are evidence for early acquisition of 'like'. Knowledge of constraints on grammatical distribution is evident at age five, and may precede the use of 'like' in discourse. Social beliefs develop later in childhood, suggesting that 'like' is acquired early as part of children’s knowledge of syntax and discourse structure, and social meanings attached later on.en_US
dc.format.extent3807202 bytes
dc.format.extent1373 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectChildren and Language Variationen_US
dc.subjectDevelopment of Language Ideologiesen_US
dc.titleChildren's Development of Knowledge and Beliefs about English Likes(s).en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineLinguisticsen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberKeller-Cohen, Deborahen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberCraig, Holly K.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberO'Shannessy, Carmelen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberQueen, Robinen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelLinguisticsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanitiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/78739/1/cvodato_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.