Show simple item record

Working Dialect: Nonstandard Voices in Victorian Literature.

dc.contributor.authorHakala, Taryn Siobhanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-18T16:07:02Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2011-01-18T16:07:02Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.date.submitteden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/78771
dc.description.abstractFor all the nineteenth-century talk about talking proper, there was considerable disagreement in Victorian England about what was considered acceptable English. Literary criticism of the Victorian novel tends to ignore these debates, taking it for granted that Standard English was the prestige norm to which Victorian speakers aspired. Such a view has led to a rather narrow field for interpreting direct dialogue written in dialect. Working Dialect calls for a revaluation of nonstandard varieties of English in Victorian literature and a reassessment of some of the terms literary critics use to talk about language in the nineteenth century. This project is literary criticism inflected by both historical and modern sociolinguistics; it brings the insights of one discipline to bear on the other to interrogate and revalue dialect’s role in Victorian literature. The texts I examine comprise both working- and middle-class attempts to represent the speech and culture of the rural and industrial labourers of the North and the servant class and independent entrepreneurs of London in both fictional and non-fictional contexts: Elizabeth Gaskell’s Mary Barton (1848), George Eliot’s Adam Bede (1856), the dialect writing of Lancashire’s Ben Brierley (1825-1896) and Edwin Waugh (1816-1890), Charles Dickens’s The Pickwick Papers (1836-37), and Henry Mayhew’s letters to the Morning Chronicle (1849-50) and London Labour and the London Poor (1851-52; 1861). While these various representations of working-class voices are neither as accurate nor authentic as they often claimed or aspired to be, they reveal not only the importance nineteenth-century philologists placed on preserving nonstandard varieties of English but also the fascination for linguistic variation that writers and readers of all classes had. This project aims to amplify the nonstandard voices of Victorian literature in order to parse the paradoxes and complexities attendant to them. The importance of dialect in Victorian literature should not be underestimated. In listening intently to the accents of class, gender, and region across genre and across the landscape of England, Working Dialect challenges critical assumptions about how class, gender, and regional identities were imagined, constructed, and performed in nineteenth-century England and in the pages of its literature.en_US
dc.format.extent2007846 bytes
dc.format.extent33893 bytes
dc.format.extent99438 bytes
dc.format.extent1373 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectVictorian Literatureen_US
dc.subjectVictorian Studiesen_US
dc.subjectDialect Literatureen_US
dc.subjectCharles Dickensen_US
dc.subjectGeorge Elioten_US
dc.subjectElizabeth Gaskellen_US
dc.titleWorking Dialect: Nonstandard Voices in Victorian Literature.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEnglish Language & Literatureen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberVicinus, Martha J.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberBailey, Richard W.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberCurzan, Anne Leslieen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberPinch, Adela N.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberQueen, Robinen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEnglish Language and Literatureen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanitiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/78771/1/thakala_3.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/78771/2/thakala_1.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/78771/3/thakala_2.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.