Show simple item record

Development of Geriatric Competencies for Emergency Medicine Residents Using an Expert Consensus Process

dc.contributor.authorHogan, Teresita M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLosman, Eve D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCarpenter, Christopher R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSauvigne, Karenen_US
dc.contributor.authorIrmiter, Cherylen_US
dc.contributor.authorEmanuel, Lindaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLeipzig, Rosanne M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-31T17:42:02Z
dc.date.available2011-05-04T18:52:58Zen_US
dc.date.issued2010-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationHogan, Teresita M.; Losman, Eve D.; Carpenter, Christopher R.; Sauvigne, Karen; Irmiter, Cheryl; Emanuel, Linda; Leipzig, Rosanne M.; (2010). "Development of Geriatric Competencies for Emergency Medicine Residents Using an Expert Consensus Process." Academic Emergency Medicine 17(3): 316-324. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79220>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1069-6563en_US
dc.identifier.issn1553-2712en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79220
dc.description.abstractThe emergency department (ED) visit rate for older patients exceeds that of all age groups other than infants. The aging population will increase elder ED patient utilization to 35% to 60% of all visits. Older patients can have complex clinical presentations and be resource-intensive. Evidence indicates that emergency physicians fail to provide consistent high-quality care for elder ED patients, resulting in poor clinical outcomes.The objective was to develop a consensus document, “Geriatric Competencies for Emergency Medicine Residents,” by identified experts. This is a minimum set of behaviorally based performance standards that all residents should be able to demonstrate by completion of their residency training.This consensus-based process utilized an inductive, qualitative, multiphase method to determine the minimum geriatric competencies needed by emergency medicine (EM) residents. Assessments of face validity and reliability were used throughout the project.In Phase I, participants ( n =  363) identified 12 domains and 300 potential competencies. In Phase II, an expert panel ( n =  24) clustered the Phase I responses, resulting in eight domains and 72 competencies. In Phase III, the expert panel reduced the competencies to 26. In Phase IV, analysis of face validity and reliability yielded a 100% consensus for eight domains and 26 competencies. The domains identified were atypical presentation of disease; trauma, including falls; cognitive and behavioral disorders; emergent intervention modifications; medication management; transitions of care; pain management and palliative care; and effect of comorbid conditions.The Geriatric Competencies for EM Residents is a consensus document that can form the basis for EM residency curricula and assessment to meet the demands of our aging population.ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:316–324 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicineen_US
dc.format.extent339217 bytes
dc.format.extent29413 bytes
dc.format.extent3106 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/octet-stream
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.subject.otherGeriatricsen_US
dc.subject.otherEmergency Medicine Residentsen_US
dc.subject.otherCompetencyen_US
dc.subject.otherConsensusen_US
dc.titleDevelopment of Geriatric Competencies for Emergency Medicine Residents Using an Expert Consensus Processen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid20370765en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/79220/1/j.1553-2712.2010.00684.x.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/79220/2/ACEM_684_sm_DataSupplementS1.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00684.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceAcademic Emergency Medicineen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.