Show simple item record

Immunostaining in Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Review

dc.contributor.authorEl Tal, Abdel Kaderen_US
dc.contributor.authorAbrou, Ayad E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorStiff, Mark A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMehregan, David A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-31T17:51:37Z
dc.date.available2011-05-04T18:52:58Zen_US
dc.date.issued2010-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationEl Tal, Abdel Kader; Abrou, Ayad E.; Stiff, Mark A.; Mehregan, David A.; (2010). "Immunostaining in Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Review." Dermatologic Surgery 36(3): 275-290. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79305>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1076-0512en_US
dc.identifier.issn1524-4725en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79305
dc.description.abstractWith the advent of incorporating the immunoperoxidase staining technique into the processing of frozen tissue, the use of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) has been expanded to include several high-risk tumors such as lentigo maligna, malignant melanoma, and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.To thoroughly review the English medical literature pertaining to the use of immunohistochemical staining techniques on frozen sections during MMS and to summarize the basic relevant outcomes from the different relevant studies.Medline search was conducted, with the following words used in the search criteria: “Mohs surgery,”“staining,”“immunostaining,” and “immunoperoxidase.”Generally, all immunostains showed advantage over the traditional hematoxylin and eosin approach. Studies of MART-1 in melanoma chemosurgery indicated that it is typically crisp and has less background staining than MEL-5 and better staining consistency than HMB-45. In cases of desmoplastic melanomas, S100 is the stain of choice.Immunostaining offers an advantage in MMS. Large, randomized, prospective studies comparing the different immunostains are still lacking in the literature. The authors have indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters.en_US
dc.format.extent2718577 bytes
dc.format.extent3106 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.titleImmunostaining in Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDermatologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDermatology Department, Wayne State University, Dearborn, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBeacon Hill Dermatology, Dearborn, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSkin Cancer Center of Southeast Michigan, Southfield, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherPinkus Dermatopathology Laboratory, Monroe, Michiganen_US
dc.identifier.pmid20100275en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/79305/1/j.1524-4725.2009.01432.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01432.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceDermatologic Surgeryen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.