Show simple item record

Further validation of the short form versions of the pelvic floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and pelvic floor impact questionnaire (PFIQ)

dc.contributor.authorBarber, Matthew D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Zhenen_US
dc.contributor.authorLukacz, Emily S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMarkland, Alayneen_US
dc.contributor.authorWai, Clifforden_US
dc.contributor.authorBrubaker, Lindaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNygaard, Ingrid E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWeidner, Alisonen_US
dc.contributor.authorJanz, Nancy K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSpino, Cathieen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-06T15:39:05Z
dc.date.available2012-05-14T20:40:08Zen_US
dc.date.issued2011-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationBarber, Matthew D.; Chen, Zhen; Lukacz, Emily; Markland, Alayne; Wai, Clifford; Brubaker, Linda; Nygaard, Ingrid; Weidner, Alison; Janz, Nancy K.; Spino, Cathie (2011). "Further validation of the short form versions of the pelvic floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and pelvic floor impact questionnaire (PFIQ)." Neurourology and Urodynamics 30(4): 541-546. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/83746>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0733-2467en_US
dc.identifier.issn1520-6777en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/83746
dc.description.abstractAims To evaluate validity and responsiveness of PFDI and PFIQ short forms across four multi-center studies and develop conversion formulas between short and long versions. Methods 1,006 participants in four prospective studies of pelvic floor disorders completed long versions of the PFDI, PFIQ, and SF-36 (or SF-12) at baseline and 3 and 12 months after treatment. Responses were used to calculate scores for the short versions. We calculated correlations between scale versions using Pearson's correlation coefficient and compared their relative responsiveness using the standardized response mean. Results PFDI and PFIQ short form scale scores demonstrated excellent correlations with long versions and similar responsiveness. Responsiveness was good to excellent for PFDI-20 urinary and prolapse scales, moderate for PFDI-20 colorectal scale and each of the PFIQ-7 scales, and poor for SF-36 (or SF-12) summary scores. Conversion formulas demonstrated excellent goodness of fit. Conclusions The long and short forms of the PFDI and PFIQ correlate well and have similar overall responsiveness in participants from four different prospective multicenter studies consisting of diverse patient populations with a broad range of pelvic floor disorders. The short forms provide a reliable and valid alternative in situations where reduced response burden is desired. 30:541–546, 2011. © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherMiscellaneous Medicalen_US
dc.titleFurther validation of the short form versions of the pelvic floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and pelvic floor impact questionnaire (PFIQ)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumData Coordinating Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumData Coordinating Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumData Coordinating Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherObstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio ; Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Desk A81, Cleveland, OH 44195.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Californiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Medicine, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabamaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texasen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Urology, Loyola University, Chicago, Illinoisen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utahen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolinaen_US
dc.identifier.pmid21344495en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/83746/1/20934_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/nau.20934en_US
dc.identifier.sourceNeurourology and Urodynamicsen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.