Further validation of the short form versions of the pelvic floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and pelvic floor impact questionnaire (PFIQ)
dc.contributor.author | Barber, Matthew D. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, Zhen | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lukacz, Emily S. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Markland, Alayne | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wai, Clifford | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Brubaker, Linda | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Nygaard, Ingrid E. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Weidner, Alison | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Janz, Nancy K. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Spino, Cathie | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-05-06T15:39:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-05-14T20:40:08Z | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2011-04 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Barber, Matthew D.; Chen, Zhen; Lukacz, Emily; Markland, Alayne; Wai, Clifford; Brubaker, Linda; Nygaard, Ingrid; Weidner, Alison; Janz, Nancy K.; Spino, Cathie (2011). "Further validation of the short form versions of the pelvic floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and pelvic floor impact questionnaire (PFIQ)." Neurourology and Urodynamics 30(4): 541-546. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/83746> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0733-2467 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1520-6777 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/83746 | |
dc.description.abstract | Aims To evaluate validity and responsiveness of PFDI and PFIQ short forms across four multi-center studies and develop conversion formulas between short and long versions. Methods 1,006 participants in four prospective studies of pelvic floor disorders completed long versions of the PFDI, PFIQ, and SF-36 (or SF-12) at baseline and 3 and 12 months after treatment. Responses were used to calculate scores for the short versions. We calculated correlations between scale versions using Pearson's correlation coefficient and compared their relative responsiveness using the standardized response mean. Results PFDI and PFIQ short form scale scores demonstrated excellent correlations with long versions and similar responsiveness. Responsiveness was good to excellent for PFDI-20 urinary and prolapse scales, moderate for PFDI-20 colorectal scale and each of the PFIQ-7 scales, and poor for SF-36 (or SF-12) summary scores. Conversion formulas demonstrated excellent goodness of fit. Conclusions The long and short forms of the PFDI and PFIQ correlate well and have similar overall responsiveness in participants from four different prospective multicenter studies consisting of diverse patient populations with a broad range of pelvic floor disorders. The short forms provide a reliable and valid alternative in situations where reduced response burden is desired. 30:541–546, 2011. © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Life and Medical Sciences | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Miscellaneous Medical | en_US |
dc.title | Further validation of the short form versions of the pelvic floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and pelvic floor impact questionnaire (PFIQ) | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Internal Medicine and Specialties | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Data Coordinating Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Data Coordinating Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Data Coordinating Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio ; Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Desk A81, Cleveland, OH 44195. | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Reproductive Medicine, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Medicine, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Urology, Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 21344495 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/83746/1/20934_ftp.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/nau.20934 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Neurourology and Urodynamics | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.