Show simple item record

Satisfaction from conservation activities in North America

dc.contributor.authorDe Young, Raymond
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-09T19:19:30Z
dc.date.available2011-05-09T19:19:30Z
dc.date.issued1985
dc.identifier.citationDe Young, R. (1985) Satisfaction from conservation activities in North America, Environmental Conservation, 12, 3, 259-260 <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/83773>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0376-8929 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1469-4387 (electronic)
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/83773
dc.descriptionPublished online: 24 August 2009en_US
dc.description.abstractOne must avoid equating quality-of-life and sense of well-being with economic standard of living. It turns out that the North American public is concerned about intangible as well as tangible sources of well-being. In fact, a shift towards deriving one's well-being from intangible sources would seem an adaptive response to a world facing deep energy and material descent and the same time it deals with the consequences of past climate disruption. Despite the common-sense nature of the findings reported here, their application as a coping strategy is often overlooked. Clearly, human well-being can be increased in many non-economic ways. Due to the plurality of human satisfaction, people have the potential to improve their quality of life even if they have difficulty growing, or even maintaining, their economic status. For this potential to be realized, however, people must be able to become involved in their environment: they must be able to take actions to explore and to experiment, on a daily basis. They must, in short, experience the environment as supportive of their concern to participate and avoid wastefulness. Fortunately, our settlements can be designed and managed in ways that enhance environmental supportiveness. In fact, prefiguring supportive environments may be vital to easing our transition to an energy and material-constrained existence.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipPartial funding for this research was provided by the University of Michigan Office of Energy Research (Project No. 65).en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.subjectConservation Behavioren_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Stewardshipen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Psychologyen_US
dc.subjectMotivationen_US
dc.subjectIntrinsic Motivationen_US
dc.subjectIntrinsic Satisfactionen_US
dc.subjectPsychological Well Beingen_US
dc.subjectFrugalityen_US
dc.subjectParticipationen_US
dc.subjectLocalizationen_US
dc.titleSatisfaction from conservation activities in North Americaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environment
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumNatural Resources and Environment, School ofen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/83773/1/De_Young_(1985)_Satisfaction_from_conservation_activities_in_North_America,_EC,_12,_3,_259-260.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0376892900016003
dc.identifier.sourceEnvironmental Conservationen_US
dc.owningcollnameEnvironment and Sustainability, School for (SEAS/SNRE)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.