JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Zonal versus meridional velocity variance in satellite observations and realistic and idealized ocean circulation models
Scott, Robert; Arbic, Brian K.; Holland, Christina; Sen, Ayon; Qiu, Bo
2008
Citation:Scott, R.B., Arbic, B.K., Holland, C.L., Sen, A., and B. Qiu 2008, Zonal versus meridional velocity variance in satellite observations and realistic and idealized ocean circulation models, Ocean Modelling 23, 102-112, doi:10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.04.009 <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/84340>
Abstract: Global, high-quality, satellite-based observation of oceanic currents over the past 13 years has revealed
ubiquitous quasi-horizontal eddies in the mesoscale (tens to hundreds of kilometers), confirming the
view of a highly turbulent ocean suggested by observational programs in the 1970s. Idealized quasigeostrophic
turbulence models suggest mesoscale turbulent flow can vary between isotropic, and highly
anisotropic zonal jets. Here we compare the zonal and meridional velocity variance from satellite altimetry.
We find that, for an unexplained reason and despite the chaotic nature of turbulence, the surface
flow is organized into mesoscale patches where either zonal or meridional velocity variance dominates.
The patches persist over 13 years, much longer than the turbulent timescale of a few months. Implications
include potentially highly anisotropic redistribution of tracers by the mesoscale flow. Zonally averaged
velocity variances reveal a slight preference for meridional over zonal velocity variance. Realistic
primitive equation models succeed in reproducing both the patchy structure in local preference for either
zonal or meridional velocity variance, and the zonally averaged preference for meridional variance. Idealized
models of fully developed, quasigeostrophic turbulence fail in both regards.