Show simple item record

Evaluation of New Mexico crash data reported to MCMIS crash file

dc.contributor.authorGreen, Paul E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBlower, D.en_US
dc.contributorUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Institute, Center for National Truck and Bus Statisticsen_US
dc.contributorUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Institute, Transportation Safety Analysis Divisionen_US
dc.contributorUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Institute, Truck and Bus Safety Analysis Divisionen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-01-31T22:37:02Z
dc.date.available2006-01-31T22:37:02Z
dc.date.issued2005-07en_US
dc.identifierAccession Number: 98938en_US
dc.identifier.otherReport Number: UMTRI-2005-17en_US
dc.identifier.otherContract Number: DTMC75-02-R-00090en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/8518
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 23)en_US
dc.descriptionSpecial report, Task Den_US
dc.description.abstractThis report is part of a series evaluating the data submitted by the several States to the Motor Carrier Management Information System (MCMIS) Crash File. Earlier studies showed that reporting to the MCMIS Crash File was significantly incomplete. This report examines reporting from the state of New Mexico. New Mexico Police Accident Report (PAR) files were matched to the MCMIS Crash file to determine the nature and extent of underreporting. In 2003, there were 1,042 vehicles involved in crashes in New Mexico that were reportable to the MCMIS Crash file. Of these vehicles, 94 were actually reported, resulting in a reporting rate of 9.0%. It appears that there are significant problems in following the guidelines for reporting MCMIS reportable cases. In addition, 47 cases, or 32.4% of the 145 MCMIS cases that were reported do not qualify for reporting. Reporting rates vary by crash severity, crash month, road system, vehicle license plate state, county, and reporting agency. The reporting rate for fatal crashes was 27.5%. Of the 94 cases reported, only 4 were reported after July. The reporting rate was greater on rural interstate roads (16.5%) than on urban roads (4.4%), and vehicles with license plates from states outside of New Mexico had a higher reporting rate (12.3%) than vehicles with New Mexico license plates (4.8%). The reporting rate for buses was only 3.3%. Data quality is also reviewed. The PAR file contains some inconsistencies with respect to vehicle type. The MCMIS file, even though containing only 145 observations, suffers from missing data on several variables.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFederal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.en_US
dc.formatill, chartsen_US
dc.format.extent1943 bytes
dc.format.extent1635479 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Instituteen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMCMIS Crash Fileen_US
dc.subject.otherMotor Carriersen_US
dc.subject.otherTrucksen_US
dc.subject.otherBusesen_US
dc.subject.otherEvaluative Methodsen_US
dc.subject.otherDatabases/ Data Banksen_US
dc.subject.otherData Acquisition Methodsen_US
dc.subject.otherAccident Statistics/ Accident Ratesen_US
dc.subject.otherAccident Recordsen_US
dc.subject.otherPolice Reportsen_US
dc.subject.otherState Governments/ Province Governmentsen_US
dc.subject.otherNew Mexicoen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of New Mexico crash data reported to MCMIS crash fileen_US
dc.title.alternativeEvaluation of New Mexico crash data reported to Motor Carrier Management Information System crash fileen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelTransportationen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/8518/2/98938.pdfen_US
dc.owningcollnameTransportation Research Institute (UMTRI)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.