Show simple item record

Red blood cell transfusion and outcomes in patients with acute lung injury, sepsis and shock

dc.contributor.authorParsons, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorHough, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorSeymour, Christopher W.
dc.contributor.authorCooke, Colin
dc.contributor.authorRubenfeld, Gordon
dc.contributor.authorWatkins, Timothy
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-02T02:46:44Z
dc.date.available2011-10-02T02:46:44Z
dc.date.issued2011-09-21
dc.identifier.citationCritical Care 2011, 15:R221 <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/86646>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/86646
dc.description.abstractIntroduction To determine the association between red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and outcomes in patients with acute lung injury (ALI), sepsis, and shock. Methods We performed a secondary analysis of new-onset ALI patients enrolled in the ARDSNet Fluid and Catheter Treatment Trial (2000-2005) who had a documented ALI risk factor of sepsis or pneumonia and met shock criteria (mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 60 mm Hg or vasopressor use) within 24 hours of randomization. Using multivariable logistic regression, we examined the association between RBC transfusion and 28-day mortality after adjustment for age, sex, race, randomization arm, and APACHE III score. Secondary endpoints included 90-day mortality and ventilator free days (VFDs). Finally, we examined these endpoints among the subset of subjects meeting prespecified transfusion criteria defined by four simultaneous indicators: hemoglobin < 10.2 g/dL, central or mixed venous oxygen saturation < 70%, central venous pressure >= 8 mm Hg, MAP >= 65 mm Hg, and vasopressor use. Results We identified 285 subjects with ALI, sepsis, shock and transfusion data. Of these, 85 also met the above prespecified transfusion criteria. Fifty-three (19%) of the 285 subjects with shock and 20 (24%) of the subset meeting transfusion criteria received RBC transfusion within 24 hours of randomization. We found no independent association between RBC transfusion and 28-day mortality (odds ratio = 1.49, 95% CI: 0.77, 2.90, P=0.23) or VFDs (mean difference = -0.35, 95% CI: -4.03, 3.32 P=0.85). Likewise, 90-day mortality and VFDs did not differ by transfusion status. Among the subset meeting transfusion criteria, we found no independent association between transfusion and mortality or VFDs. Conclusions In patients with new-onset ALI, sepsis, and shock, we found no independent association between RBC transfusion and mortality or VFDs. Physiologic criteria did not identify patients more likely to be transfused or to benefit from transfusion.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleRed blood cell transfusion and outcomes in patients with acute lung injury, sepsis and shocken_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialities
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumPulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Division ofen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumInternal Medicine, Department ofen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/86646/1/Parsons - Transfusion and ALI.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/cc10458
dc.identifier.sourceCritical Careen_US
dc.owningcollnamePulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Division of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.