Show simple item record

Nystagmus Assessments Documented by Emergency Physicians in Acute Dizziness Presentations: A Target for Decision Support?

dc.contributor.authorKerber, Kevin A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMorgenstern, Lewis B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMeurer, William J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMcLaughlin, Thomasen_US
dc.contributor.authorHall, Pamela A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorForman, Janeen_US
dc.contributor.authorMark Fendrick, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNewman‐toker, David E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-10T15:34:05Z
dc.date.available2012-07-12T17:42:24Zen_US
dc.date.issued2011-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationKerber, Kevin A.; Morgenstern, Lewis B.; Meurer, William J.; McLaughlin, Thomas; Hall, Pamela A.; Forman, Jane; Mark Fendrick, A.; Newman‐toker, David E. (2011). "Nystagmus Assessments Documented by Emergency Physicians in Acute Dizziness Presentations: A Target for Decision Support?." Academic Emergency Medicine 18(6). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/86927>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1069-6563en_US
dc.identifier.issn1553-2712en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/86927
dc.description.abstractObjectives:  Dizziness is a common presenting complaint to the emergency department (ED), and emergency physicians (EPs) consider these presentations a priority for decision support. Assessing for nystagmus and defining its features are important steps for any acute dizziness decision algorithm. The authors sought to describe nystagmus documentation in routine ED care to determine if nystagmus assessments might be an important target in decision support efforts. Methods:  Medical records from ED visits for dizziness were captured as part of a surveillance study embedded within an ongoing population‐based cohort study. Visits with documentation of a nystagmus assessment were reviewed and coded for presence or absence of nystagmus, ability to draw a meaningful inference from the description, and coherence with the final EP diagnosis when a peripheral vestibular diagnosis was made. Results:  Of 1,091 visits for dizziness, 887 (81.3%) documented a nystagmus assessment. Nystagmus was present in 185 of 887 (20.9%) visits. When nystagmus was present, no further characteristics were recorded in 48 of the 185 visits (26%). The documentation of nystagmus (including all descriptors recorded) enabled a meaningful inference about the localization or cause in only 10 of the 185 (5.4%) visits. The nystagmus description conflicted with the EP diagnosis in 113 (80.7%) of the 140 visits that received a peripheral vestibular diagnosis. Conclusions:  Nystagmus assessments are frequently documented in acute dizziness presentations, but details do not generally enable a meaningful inference. Recorded descriptions usually conflict with the diagnosis when a peripheral vestibular diagnosis is rendered. Nystagmus assessments might be an important target in developing decision support for dizziness presentations.en_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.titleNystagmus Assessments Documented by Emergency Physicians in Acute Dizziness Presentations: A Target for Decision Support?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumFrom the Department of Neurology (KAK, LBM, WJM), the Department of Emergency Medicine (LBM, WJM), and the Department of Internal Medicine (AMF), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; the Department of Emergency Medicine, CHRISTUS Spohn Memorial Hospital (TMc), Corpus Christi, TX; the Department of Emergency Medicine, Corpus Christi Medical Center (PAH), Corpus Christi, TX; the Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System (JF), Ann Arbor, MI; and the Departments of Neurology and Otolaryngology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (DEN), Baltimore, MD.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21676060en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/86927/1/j.1553-2712.2011.01093.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01093.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceAcademic Emergency Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKerber KA, Meurer WJ, West BT, Fendrick AM. Dizziness presentations in U.S. emergency departments, 1995‐2004. Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 15: 744 – 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFife TD, Iverson DJ, Lempert T, et al. Practice parameter: therapies for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (an evidence‐based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2008; 70: 2067 – 74.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBhattacharyya N, Baugh RF, Orvidas L, et al. Clinical practice guideline: benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008; 139: S47 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrupp M, Zingler VC, Arbusow V, et al. Methylprednisolone, valacyclovir, or the combination for vestibular neuritis. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 354 – 61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEdlow JA, Newman‐Toker DE, Savitz SI. Diagnosis and initial management of cerebellar infarction. Lancet Neurol. 2008; 7: 951 – 64.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEagles D, Stiell IG, Clement CM, et al. International survey of emergency physicians’ priorities for clinical decision rules. Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 15: 177 – 82.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStanton VA, Hsieh YH, Camargo CA Jr, et al. Overreliance on symptom quality in diagnosing dizziness: results of a multicenter survey of emergency physicians. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007; 82: 1319 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewman‐Toker DE. Charted records of dizzy patients suggest emergency physicians emphasize symptom quality in diagnostic assessment. Ann Emerg Med. 2007; 50: 204 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewman‐Toker DE, Cannon LM, Stofferahn ME, Rothman RE, Hsieh YH, Zee DS. Imprecision in patient reports of dizziness symptom quality: a cross‐sectional study conducted in an acute care setting. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007; 82: 1329 – 40.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKerber KA, Brown DL, Lisabeth LD, Smith MA, Morgenstern LB. Stroke among patients with dizziness, vertigo, and imbalance in the emergency department: a population‐based study. Stroke. 2006; 37: 2484 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldstein LB, Simel DL. Is this patient having a stroke? JAMA. 2005; 293: 2391 – 402.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTarnutzer AT, Berkowitz AL, Robinson KA, Hsieh YH, Newman‐Toker DE. Acute vestibular syndrome: does my patient have a stroke? A systematic and critical review of bedside diagnostic predictors. CMAJ. 2011; in press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSavitz SI, Caplan LR, Edlow JA. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of cerebellar infarction. Acad Emerg Med. 2007; 14: 63 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewman‐Toker DE, Kattah JC, Alvernia JE, Wang DZ. Normal head impulse test differentiates acute cerebellar strokes from vestibular neuritis. Neurology. 2008; 70: 2378 – 85.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKattah JC, Talkad AV, Wang DZ, Hsieh YH, Newman‐Toker DE. HINTS to diagnose stroke in the acute vestibular syndrome: three‐step bedside oculomotor examination more sensitive than early MRI diffusion‐weighted imaging. Stroke. 2009; 40: 3504 – 10.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee H, Sohn SI, Cho YW, et al. Cerebellar infarction presenting isolated vertigo: frequency and vascular topographical patterns. Neurology. 2006; 67: 1178 – 83.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKerber KA, Schweigler L, West BT, Fendrick AM, Morgenstern LB. Value of computed tomography scans in ED dizziness visits: analysis from a nationally‐representative sample. Am J Emerg Med. 2010; 28: 1030 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChalela JA, Kidwell CS, Nentwich LM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute stroke: a prospective comparison. Lancet. 2007; 369: 293 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaloh RW. Clinical practice. Vestibular neuritis. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 1027 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaloh RW, Honrubia V. Clinical Neurophysiology of the Vestibular System. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHotson JR, Baloh RW. Acute vestibular syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339: 680 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFurman JM, Cass SP. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341: 1590 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKerber KA. Vertigo and dizziness in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2009; 27: 39 – 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceButtner U, Helmchen C, Brandt T. Diagnostic criteria for central versus peripheral positioning nystagmus and vertigo: a review. Acta Otolaryngol. 1999; 119: 1 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewman‐Toker DE, Stanton VA, Hsieh YH, Rothman RE. Frontline providers harbor misconceptions about the bedside evaluation of dizzy patients. Acta Otolaryngol. 2008; 128: 601 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorgenstern LB, Steffen‐Batey L, Smith MA, Moye LA. Barriers to acute stroke therapy and stroke prevention in Mexican Americans. Stroke. 2001; 32: 1360 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteenerson RL, Cronin GW, Marbach PM. Effectiveness of treatment techniques in 923 cases of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Laryngoscope. 2005; 115: 226 – 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceProkopakis EP, Chimona T, Tsagournisakis M, et al. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: 10‐year experience in treating 592 patients with canalith repositioning procedure. Laryngoscope. 2005; 115: 1667 – 71.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewman‐Toker DE, Sharma P, Chowdhury M, Clemons TM, Zee DS, Della Santina CC. Penlight‐cover test: a new bedside method to unmask nystagmus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009; 80: 900 – 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEggers SD, Zee DS. Evaluating the dizzy patient: bedside examination and laboratory assessment of the vestibular system. Semin Neurol. 2003; 23: 47 – 58.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHalmagyi GM. Diagnosis and management of vertigo. Clin Med. 2005; 5: 159 – 65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewman‐Toker DE, Camargo CA Jr, Hsieh YH, Pelletier AJ, Edlow JA. Disconnect between charted vestibular diagnoses and emergency department management decisions: a cross‐sectional analysis from a nationally representative sample. Acad Emerg Med. 2009; 16: 970 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCnyrim CD, Newman‐Toker D, Karch C, Brandt T, Strupp M. Bedside differentiation of vestibular neuritis from central “vestibular pseudoneuritis”. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008; 79: 458 – 60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee H, Kim JS, Chung EJ, et al. Infarction in the territory of anterior inferior cerebellar artery: spectrum of audiovestibular loss. Stroke. 2009; 40: 3745 – 51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcDermott MF, Lenhardt RO, Catrambone CD, Walter J, Weiss KB. Adequacy of medical chart review to characterize emergency care for asthma: findings from the Illinois Emergency Department Asthma Collaborative. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13: 345 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStange KC, Zyzanski SJ, Smith TF, et al. How valid are medical records and patient questionnaires for physician profiling and health services research? A comparison with direct observation of patients visits. Med Care. 1998; 36: 851 – 67.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdams HP Jr, del Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, et al. Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke. 2007; 38: 1655 – 711.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.