View Item 

Show simple item record

Transplanting Kidneys Without Points for HLA‐B Matching: Consequences of the Policy Change

dc.contributor.authorAshby, Valarie B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPort, Friedrich K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWolfe, Robert A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWynn, James J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, W. W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, John P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLeichtman, Alan B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-10T15:38:22Z
dc.date.available2012-10-01T18:34:41Zen_US
dc.date.issued2011-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationAshby, V. B.; Port, F. K.; Wolfe, R. A.; Wynn, J. J.; Williams, W. W.; Roberts, J. P.; Leichtman, A. B. (2011). "Transplanting Kidneys Without Points for HLA‐B Matching: Consequences of the Policy Change." American Journal of Transplantation 11(8). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/87103>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6135en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6143en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/87103
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherAccess to Transplantationen_US
dc.subject.otherAllocationen_US
dc.subject.otherHLA Matchingen_US
dc.subject.otherKidney Graft Survivalen_US
dc.subject.otherKidney Transplantationen_US
dc.subject.otherMinoritiesen_US
dc.subject.otherPolicyen_US
dc.subject.otherRacial and Ethnic Disparitiesen_US
dc.titleTransplanting Kidneys Without Points for HLA‐B Matching: Consequences of the Policy Changeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biostatistics, Kidney Epidemiology and Cost Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, Georgia Health Sciences University, Augusta, GAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherRenal and Transplantation Units, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherLiver and Kidney Transplant Service, University of California, San Francisco, CAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/87103/1/j.1600-6143.2011.03606.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03606.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Transplantationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAyanian JZ, Cleary PD, Keogh JH, Noonan SJ, David‐Kasdan JA, Epstein AM. Physicians’ beliefs about racial differences in referral for renal transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis 2004; 43: 350 – 372.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSoucie JM, Neylan JF, McClellan W. Race and sex differences in the identification of candidates for renal transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis 1992; 9: 414 – 419.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHicks LS, Cleary PD, Epstein AM, Ayanian JZ. Differences in health‐related quality of life and treatment preferences among black and white patients with end‐stage renal disease. Qual Life Res 2004; 13: 1129 – 1137.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGaston RS. Improving access to renal transplantation. Semin Dial 2005; 18: 482 – 486.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEpstein AM, Ayanian JZ, Keogh JH, et al. Racial disparities in access to renal transplantation—clinically appropriate or due to underuse or overuse? N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1537 – 1544.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlexander GC, Sehgal AR. Barriers to cadaveric renal transplantation among blacks, women, and the poor. JAMA 1998; 280: 1148 – 1152.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, et al. Differences in access to cadaveric renal transplantation in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 36: 1025 – 1033.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOjo AO, Port FK. Influence of race and gender on related donor renal transplantation rates. Am J Kidney Dis 1993; 22: 835 – 841.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeld PJ, Pauly MV, Bovbjerg RR, Newmann J, Salvatierra O Jr. Access to kidney transplantation. Has the United States eliminated income and racial differences? Arch Intern Med 1988; 148: 2594 – 2600.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen DJ, St. Martin L, Christensen LL, Bloom RD, Sung RS. The 2005 SRTR Report on the State of Transplantation: Kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1995–2004. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 1153 – 1169.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrgan Procurement and Transplantation Network. Policy 3.5. Allocation of deceased kidneys. Available at: http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/PoliciesandBylaws2/policies/pdfs/policy_7.pdf. Accessed March 25, 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRebellato LM, Arnold AN, Bozik KM, Haisch CE. HLA matching and the United Network for Organ Sharing allocation system: Impact of HLA matching on African‐American recipients of cadaveric kidney transplants. Transplantation 2002; 74: 1634 – 1636.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeld PJ, Kahan BD, Hunsicker LG, et al. The impact of HLA mismatches on the survival of first cadaveric kidney transplants. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 765 – 770.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoberts JP, Wolfe RA, Bragg‐Gresham JL, et al. Effect of changing the priority for HLA matching on the rates and outcomes of kidney transplantation in minority groups. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 545 – 551.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2007 Annual Report of the U.S. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: Transplant Data 1997–2006. Rockville, MD: Health Resources and Services Administration, Healthcare Systems Bureau, Division of Transplantation.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMutinga N, Brennan DC, Schnitzler MA. Consequences of eliminating HLA‐B in deceased donor kidney allocation to increase minority transplantation. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 1090 – 1098.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1600-6143.2011.03606.x.pdf
Size:
194.6KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.