View Item 

Show simple item record

Mechanisms of continence and surgical cure in female and male SUI: Surgical research initiatives

dc.contributor.authorStaskin, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorTubaro, Andreaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNorton, Peggy A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAshton‐Miller, James A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-10T15:40:14Z
dc.date.available2012-07-12T17:42:25Zen_US
dc.date.issued2011-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationStaskin, David; Tubaro, Andrea; Norton, Peggy A.; Ashton‐miller, James A. (2011). "Mechanisms of continence and surgical cure in female and male SUI: Surgical research initiatives ." Neurourology and Urodynamics 30(5): 704-707. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/87181>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0733-2467en_US
dc.identifier.issn1520-6777en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/87181
dc.description.abstractAims To report the conclusions of the Think Tank on mechanisms of incontinence and surgical cure in female and male SUI: surgical research initiatives during the ICI‐RS meeting in 2010. Methods The sub‐group considered five areas for future research in stress urinary incontinence (SUI); (i) epidemiology and public health efforts in SUI, (ii) the basic sciences examining the physiology and pathophysiology of the continence mechanism, (iii) diagnostic techniques and clinical assessment of SUI, (iv) the future of treatment and surgical cure, and (v) the separate issue of male SUI. Results Roadblocks to progress were identified for each of the five directions. Conclusions Future research directions are suggested for each of these areas. Neurourol. Urodynam. 30:704–707, 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherDiagnosisen_US
dc.subject.otherEpidemiologyen_US
dc.subject.otherTreatmenten_US
dc.subject.otherUrinary Incontinenceen_US
dc.titleMechanisms of continence and surgical cure in female and male SUI: Surgical research initiativesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiomechanics Research Laboratory, G.G. Brown Laboratories, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109‐2125, USA.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Urology, St.Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusettsen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, “La Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italyen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utahen_US
dc.identifier.pmid21661017en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/87181/1/21139_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/nau.21139en_US
dc.identifier.sourceNeurourology and Urodynamicsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrowbridge RE, Wei JT, Fenner DE, et al. Effects of aging on lower urinary tract and pelvic floor function in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 715 – 720.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClobes A, DeLancey JO, Morgan DM. Urethral circular smooth muscle in young and old women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198: e1 – e5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerucchini D, DeLancey JOL, Ashton‐Miller JA, et al. Age effects on urethral striated muscle: I Changes in number and diameter of striated muscle fibers in the ventral urethra. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 351 – 355.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerucchini D, DeLancey JOL, Ashton‐Miller JA, et al. Age effects urethral striated muscle: II. Anatomic location of muscle loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 356 – 360.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePandit M, DeLancey JO, Ashton‐Miller JA, et al. Quantification of intramuscular nerves within the female striated urogenital sphincter muscle. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 797 – 800.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeLancey JO, Miller JM, Kearney R, et al. Vaginal birth and de novo stress incontinence: Relative contributions of urethral dysfunction and mobility. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 354 – 362.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeLancey JOL, Trowbridge ER, Miller JM, et al. Stress urinary incontinence: Relative importance of urethral support and urethral closure pressure. J Urol 2008; 179: 2286 – 2290.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim K‐J, Ashton‐Miller JA, Strohbehn K, et al. The vesico‐urethral pressuregram analysis of urethral function under stress. J Biomech 1997; 30: 19 – 25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeLancey JOL, Fenner DE, Guire K, et al. Differences in continence system between community‐dwelling black and white women with and without urinary incontinence in the EPI study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202: e1 – e12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrohbehn K, Quint LE, Prince MR, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging anatomy of the female urethra: A direct histologic comparison. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 750 – 756.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStafford RE, Sapsford R, Ashton‐Miller JA, et al. A novel transurethral surface electrode to record male striated urethral sphincter electromyographic activity. J Urol 2010; 183: 378 – 385.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlarskov N, Lose G. Urethral pressure Re£ectometry; A novel technique for simultaneous recording of pressure and cross‐sectional area in the female urethra. Neurourol Urodyn 2007; 26: 254 – 261.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMa J, Goble K, Smietana M, et al. Morphological and functional characteristics of three‐dimensional engineered bone‐ligament‐bone constructs following implantation. J Biomech Eng 2009; 131: art. no. 101017‐1.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAshton‐Miller JA, DeLancey JOL. Functional anatomy of the female pelvic floor. Ann NY Acad Sci 2007; 1101: 266 – 296.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThor KB, deGroat WC. Neural control of the female urethral and anal rhabdosphincters and pelvic floor muscles. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2010; 299: R416 – R438.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJunginger B, Baessler K, Sapsford R, et al. Effect of abdominal and pelvic floor tasks on muscle activity, bladder pressure and bladder neck. Int Urogyn J 2010; 21: 69 – 77.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStaskin D, Khullar V. Female pelvic surgical devices and techniques need better evidence‐based medicine. Neurourol Urodyn 2010; 29: 670 – 675.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTincello DG, Alfirevic Z. Important clinical outcomes in urogynaecology: Views of patients, nurses and medical staff. Int Urogynaecol J 2002; 13: 96.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElkadry EA, Kenton KS, Fitzgerald MP, et al. Patient selected goals: A new perspective on surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 189: 1551 – 1557.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMahajan ST, Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, et al. Patient centered surgical outcomes: The impact of goal achievement and urge incontinence on patient satisfaction one year after surgery. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 2006; 194: 722 – 728.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLowenstein L, Fitzgerald MP, Kenton K, et al. Patient‐selected goals: The fourth dimension in assessment of pelvic floor disorders. Int Urogyn J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008; 19: 81 – 84.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSrikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L. Qualifying a quantitative approach to women's expectations of continence surgery. Int Urogyn J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009; 20: 859 – 865.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWard JF, Sebo TJ, Blute ML, et al. Salvage surgery for radiorecurrent prostate cancer: Contemporary outcomes. J Urol 2005; 173: 1156 – 1160.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKwong PW, Cumming RG, Chan L, et al. Urinary incontinence and quality of life among older community‐dwelling Australian men: The CHAMP study. Age Ageing 2010; 39: 349 – 354.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTeunissen D, Van Den Bosch W, Van Weel C, et al. “ It can always happen”: The impact of urinary incontinence on elderly men and women. Scand J Prim Health Care 2006; 24: 166 – 173.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiu DK, Lau S, Szeto SS. Etiology and predictors of urinary incontinence and its effect on quality of life. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2010; 10: 177 – 182.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRassweiler J, Teber D, Kuntz R, et al. Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)–incidence, management, and prevention. Eur Urol 2006; 50: 969 – 979.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJacobsen NE, Moore KN, Estey E, et al. Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective comparison of postoperative urinary incontinence rates. J Urol 2007; 177: 615 – 619.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSacco E, Prayer‐Galetti T, Pinto F, et al. Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: Incidence by definition, risk factors and temporal trend in a large series with a long‐term follow‐up. BJU Int 2006; 97: 1234 – 1241.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePotdevin L, Ercolani M, Jeong J, et al. Functional and oncologic outcomes comparing interfascial and intrafascial nerve sparing in robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies. J Endourol 2009; 23: 1479 – 1484.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceToren P, Alibhai SM, Matthew A, et al. The effect of nerve‐sparing surgery on patient‐reported continence post‐radical prostatectomy. Can Urol Assoc J 2009; 3: 465 – 470.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBauer RM, Mayer ME, Gratzke C, et al. Prospective evaluation of the functional sling suspension for male postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: Results after 1 Year. Eur Urol 2009; 56: 928 – 933.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
21139_ftp.pdf
Size:
73.47KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.