Show simple item record

Social Interaction and Variation in Middle Formative Tlaxcala, Mexico: An Analysis of Ceramics from Two Village Societies.

dc.contributor.authorCarballo, Jennifer Lynnen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-26T20:11:11Z
dc.date.available2012-01-26T20:11:11Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.date.submitteden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/89836
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluates the significance of Middle Formative (900-500 B.C.) pan-Mesoamerican ceramic motifs by documenting variability in vessel use and decoration at two villages in central Tlaxcala, Mexico. The widespread art style of the later Early Formative period (1200-900 B.C.) is characterized by shared motifs on pottery that included depictions of animals and supernatural forces and has been the subject of much debate concerning chiefly competition and interregional interaction. During the Middle Formative period, widespread similarities in ceramic decoration were still found throughout Mesoamerica but take the form of simpler “double-line-breaks” that few scholars have addressed beyond commenting that they are abstract. The study examines variation in the designs and intra-site distribution of motifs at Amomoloc and Tetel to provide evidence for how Tlaxcala’s earliest sedentary communities used pan-Mesoamerican motifs differently at varying social and spatial scales, and across time. An illustrated database of designs from Amomoloc and Tetel links motifs with exact provenience information, and is compared with published examples from Xochitécatl, the Basin of Mexico, Chalcatzingo, the Tehuacán Valley, and the Valley of Oaxaca. At approximately 900 B.C., when Amomoloc was first settled, the presentation of food was not emphasized in ceramic assemblages, few pan-Mesoamerican motifs were used to decorate pottery, and villagers participated in long-distance exchange in a relatively informal manner. From 800-650 B.C., before the development of ranked societies in central Tlaxcala, food service became increasingly focused on bowls with pan-Mesoamerican motifs, as the presentation of food was likely an important arena for the negotiation of socio-political dynamics. At the local level, a high degree of stylistic variability in the execution of motifs is observable, yet the motifs adhered to a central Tlaxcalan design tradition, referencing styles from other regions, as interregional trade networks became more formalized. After 650 B.C., ceramic assemblages changed dramatically in color and shape, and decorated serving vessels became slightly less important to the internal dynamics of village life. Shared motifs exhibit greater standardization in the themes they referenced, and stylistic ties with Chalcatzingo decreased as ties to the Basin of Mexico were strengthened through the increased formalization of long-distance exchange networks.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectEarly Village Societiesen_US
dc.subjectFormative Perioden_US
dc.subjectTlaxcala, Mexicoen_US
dc.subjectCeramic Analysisen_US
dc.subjectDesign Motifsen_US
dc.subjectPan-Mesoamerican Stylesen_US
dc.titleSocial Interaction and Variation in Middle Formative Tlaxcala, Mexico: An Analysis of Ceramics from Two Village Societies.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineAnthropologyen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberMarcus, Joyceen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberFlannery, Kent V.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberGingerich, Philip D.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberWright, Henry T.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelAnthropology and Archaeologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelLatin American and Caribbean Studiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/89836/1/jsmit_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.