Show simple item record

Predictors of survival in a cohort of patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis: effect of corticosteroids, methotrexate and azathioprine

dc.contributor.authorSchiopu, Elena
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, Kristine
dc.contributor.authorMacDonald, Paul M.
dc.contributor.authorCrofford, Leslie J.
dc.contributor.authorSomers, Emily C.
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-14T18:06:08Z
dc.date.available2012-03-14T18:06:08Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationSchiopu et al. Arthritis Research & Therapy 2012, 14:R22 <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90025>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arthritis-research.com/content/14/1/R22
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90025
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are rare diseases for which data regarding the natural history, response to therapies and factors affecting mortality are needed. We performed this study to examine the effects of treatment and clinical features on survival in polymyositis and dermatomyositis patients. Methods: A total of 160 consecutive patients (77 with polymyositis and 83 with dermatomyositis) seen at the University of Michigan from 1997 to 2003 were included. Medical records were abstracted for clinical, laboratory and therapeutic data, including initial steroid regimen and immunosuppressive use. State vital records were utilized to derive mortality and cause of death data. Survival was modeled by left-truncated Kaplan-Meier estimation and Cox regression. Results: The 5- and 10-year survival estimates were 77% (95% CI = 66 to 85), and 62% (95% CI = 48 to 73), respectively, and the rates were similar for polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Survival between the sexes was similar through 5 years and significantly lower thereafter for males (10-year survival: 18% male, 73% female; P = 0.002 for 5- to 10-year interval). The sex disparity was restricted to the polymyositis group. Increased age at diagnosis and non-Caucasian race were associated with lower survival. Intravenous versus oral corticosteroid use was associated with a higher risk of death among Caucasians (HR = 10.6, 95% CI = 2.1 to 52.8). Early survival between patients treated with methotrexate versus azathioprine was similar, but survival at 10 years was higher for the methotrexate-treated group (76% vs 52%, P = 0.046 for 5- to 10-year interval). Conclusions: Patients treated initially with intravenous corticosteroids had higher mortality, which was likely related to disease severity. Both methotrexate and azathioprine showed similar early survival benefits as first-line immunosuppressive drugs. Survival was higher between 5 and 10 years in the methotrexate-treated group, but could not be confirmed in multivariable modeling for the full follow-up period. Other important predictors of longterm survival included younger age, female sex and Caucasian race.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.titlePredictors of survival in a cohort of patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis: effect of corticosteroids, methotrexate and azathioprineen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialties
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatologyen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Community Medicine, The Lahey Clinic, 267 Boston Road, Suite 20, Billerica, MA 01862en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Kentucky, Room J503 Kentucky Clinic, Lexington, KY 40536en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/90025/1/IIM_ART2012.pdf
dc.identifier.sourceArthritis Research and Therapyen_US
dc.description.mapping16en_US
dc.description.mapping114en_US
dc.owningcollnameRheumatology, Division of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.