Show simple item record

Prevention of Catheter-Related Blood Stream Infection: Back to Basics?

dc.contributor.authorCherry-Bukowiec, Jill R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDenchev, Krassimiren_US
dc.contributor.authorDickinson, Sharonen_US
dc.contributor.authorChenoweth, Carol E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZalewski, Christyen_US
dc.contributor.authorMeldrum, Craigen_US
dc.contributor.authorSihler, Kristen C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBrunsvold, Melissa E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPapadimos, Thomas J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPark, Pauline K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNapolitano, Lena M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-22T17:23:21Z
dc.date.available2012-03-22T17:23:21Z
dc.date.issued2011-02-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationCherry-Bukowiec, Jill R.; Denchev, Krassimir; Dickinson, Sharon; Chenoweth, Carol E.; Zalewski, Christy; Meldrum, Craig; Sihler, Kristen C.; Brunsvold, Melissa E.; Papadimos, Thomas J.; Park, Pauline K.; Napolitano, Lena M. (2011). "Prevention of Catheter-Related Blood Stream Infection: Back to Basics?" Surgical Infections, 12(1): 27-32. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90456>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1096-2964en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90456
dc.description.abstractBackground: Central venous catheter (CVC)-related infections are a substantial problem in the intensive care unit (ICU). Our infection control team initiated the routine use of antiseptic-coated (chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine; Chx-SS) CVCs in our adult ICUs to reduce catheter-associated (CA) and catheter-related (CR) blood stream infection (BSI) as we implemented other educational and best practice standardization strategies. Prior randomized studies documented that the use of Chx-SS catheters reduces microbial colonization of the catheter compared with an uncoated standard (Std) CVC but does not reduce CR-BSI. We therefore implemented the routine use of uncoated Std CVCs in our surgical ICU (SICU) and examined the impact of this change. Hypothesis: The use of uncoated Std CVCs does not increase CR-BSI rate in an SICU. Methods: Prospective evaluation of universal use of uncoated Std CVCs, implemented November 2007 in the SICU. The incidences of CA-BSI and CR-BSI were compared during November 2006-October 2007 (universal use of Chx-SS CVCs) and November 2007-October 2008 (universal use of Std CVCs) by t-test. The definitions of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were used for CA-BSI and CR-BSI. Patient data were collected via a dedicated Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III coordinator for the SICU. Results: Annual use of CVCs increased significantly in the last six years, from 3,543 (2001) to 5,799 (2006) total days. The APACHE III scores on day 1 increased from a mean of 54.4 in 2004 to 55.6 in 2008 (p = 0.0010; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-5.13). The mean age of the patients was unchanged over this period, ranging from 58.2 to 59.6 years. The Chx-SS catheters were implemented in the SICU in 2002. Data regarding the specific incidence of CR-BSI were collected beginning at the end of 2005, with mandatory catheter tip cultures when CVCs were removed. Little difference was identified in the incidence of BSI between the interval with universal Chx-SS use and that with Std CVC use. (Total BSI 0.7 vs. 0.8 per 1,000 catheter days; CA-BSI 0.5 vs. 0.8 per 1,000 catheter days; CR-BSI 0.2 vs. 0 per 1,000 catheter days.) No difference was seen in the causative pathogens of CA-BSI or CR-BSI. Conclusion: Eliminating the universal use of Chx-SS-coated CVCs in an SICU with a low background incidence of CR-BSIs did not result in an increase in the rate of CR-BSIs. This study documents the greater importance of adherence to standardization of the processes of care related to CVC placement than of coated CVC use in the reduction of CR-BSI.en_US
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersen_US
dc.titlePrevention of Catheter-Related Blood Stream Infection: Back to Basics?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid21171811en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/90456/1/sur-2E2009-2E082.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/sur.2009.082en_US
dc.identifier.sourceSurgical Infectionsen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.