View Item 

Show simple item record

Managing Peri‐Implant Bone Loss: Current Understanding

dc.contributor.authorAljateeli, Manaren_US
dc.contributor.authorFu, Jia‐huien_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom‐layen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-12T17:24:34Z
dc.date.available2013-07-01T14:33:05Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationAljateeli, Manar; Fu, Jia‐hui ; Wang, Hom‐lay (2012). "Managing Periâ Implant Bone Loss: Current Understanding." Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 14: e109-e118. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/92084>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1523-0899en_US
dc.identifier.issn1708-8208en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/92084
dc.description.abstractPurpose: With the improved macro‐ and micro‐designs, dental implants enjoy a high survival rate. However, peri‐implant bone loss has recently emerged to be the focus of implant therapy. As such, researchers and clinicians are in need of finding predictable techniques to treat peri‐implant bone loss and stop its progression. Materials and Methods: Literature search on the currently available treatment modalities was performed and a brief description of each modality was provided. Results: Numerous techniques have been proposed and none has been shown to be superior and effective in managing peri‐implant bone loss. This may be because of the complex of etiological factors acting on the implant‐supported prosthesis hence the treatment approach has to be individually tailored. Conclusion: Due to the lack of high‐level clinical evidence on the management of peri‐implant bone loss, the authors, through a literature review, attempt to suggest a decision tree or guideline, based on sound periodontal surgical principles, to aid clinicians in managing peri‐implantitis associated bone loss.en_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherPeri‐Implantitisen_US
dc.subject.otherAlveolar Bone Lossen_US
dc.subject.otherBone Regenerationen_US
dc.subject.otherDental Implanten_US
dc.titleManaging Peri‐Implant Bone Loss: Current Understandingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumprofessor and director of Graduate Periodontics, Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumResident, Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA;en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21985674en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/92084/1/j.1708-8208.2011.00387.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00387.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Researchen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRomeo E, Lops D, Chiapasco M, Ghisolfi M, Vogel G. Therapy of peri‐implantitis with resective surgery. A 3‐year clinical trial on rough screw‐shaped oral implants. Part II: radiographic outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 179 – 187.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHurzeler MB, Quinones CR, Morrison EC, Caffesse RG. Treatment of peri‐implantitis using guided bone regeneration and bone grafts, alone or in combination, in beagle dogs. Part 1: clinical findings and histologic observations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995; 10: 474 – 484.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHurzeler MB, Quinones CR, Schupback P, Morrison EC, Caffesse RG. Treatment of peri‐implantitis using guided bone regeneration and bone grafts, alone or in combination, in beagle dogs. Part 2: histologic findings. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12: 168 – 175.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSahrmann P, Attin T, Schmidlin PR. Regenerative treatment of peri‐implantitis using bone substitutes and membrane: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011; 13: 46 – 57.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClaffey N, Clarke E, Polyzois I, Renvert S. Surgical treatment of peri‐implantitis. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35: 316 – 332.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoos‐Jansaker AM, Renvert S, Egelberg J. Treatment of peri‐implant infections: a literature review. J Clin Periodontol 2003; 30: 467 – 485.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFaggion CM, Jr, Schmitter M. Using the best available evidence to support clinical decisions in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25: 960 – 969.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePersson GR, Samuelsson E, Lindahl C, Renvert S. Mechanical non‐surgical treatment of peri‐implantitis: a single‐blinded randomized longitudinal clinical study. II. Microbiological results. J Clin Periodontol 2010; 37: 563 – 573.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOchsenbein C. A primer for osseous surgery. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1986; 6: 8 – 47.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenstein G. Contemporary interpretation of probing depth assessments: diagnostic and therapeutic implications. A literature review. J Periodontol 1997; 68: 1194 – 1205.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJunker R, Dimakis A, Thoneick M, Jansen JA. Effects of implant surface coatings and composition on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20 (Suppl 4 ): 185 – 206.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZechner W, Trinkl N, Watzak G, et al. Radiologic follow‐up of peri‐implant bone loss around machine‐surfaced and rough‐surfaced interforaminal implants in the mandible functionally loaded for 3 to 7 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 216 – 221.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSerino G, Turri A. Outcome of surgical treatment of peri‐implantitis: results from a 2‐year prospective clinical study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; DOI: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02098.x.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePatel RA, Wilson RF, Palmer RM. The effect of smoking on periodontal bone regeneration: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Periodontol 2011 [Epub ahead of print].en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJaved F, Romanos GE. Impact of diabetes mellitus and glycemic control on the osseointegration of dental implants: a systematic literature review. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 1719 – 1730.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCortellini P, Tonetti MS. Focus on intrabony defects: guided tissue regeneration. Periodontol 2000 2000; 22: 104 – 132.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSilverstein P. Smoking and wound healing. Am J Med 1992; 93: 22S – 24S.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrombelli L, Kim CK, Zimmerman GJ, Wikesjo UM. Retrospective analysis of factors related to clinical outcome of guided tissue regeneration procedures in intrabony defects. J Clin Periodontol 1997; 24: 366 – 371.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLorenzoni M, Pertl C, Keil C, Wegscheider WA. Treatment of peri‐implant defects with guided bone regeneration: a comparative clinical study with various membranes and bone grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 639 – 646.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLehmann B, Bragger U, Hammerle CH, Fourmousis I, Lang NP. Treatment of an early implant failure according to the principles of guided tissue regeneration (GTR). Clin Oral Implants Res 1992; 3: 42 – 48.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBashutski JD, Wang HL. Common implant esthetic complications. Implant Dent 2007; 16: 340 – 348.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang HL, Boyapati L. “PASS” principles for predictable bone regeneration. Implant Dent 2006; 15: 8 – 17.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePark SH, Lee KW, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Shotwell J, Wang HL. Effect of absorbable membranes on sandwich bone augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 32 – 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOh TJ, Meraw SJ, Lee EJ, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. Comparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14: 80 – 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJemt T, Lekholm U, Adell R. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: a preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989; 4: 211 – 217.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBahat O. Treatment planning and placement of implants in the posterior maxillae: report of 732 consecutive Nobelpharma implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993; 8: 151 – 161.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNevins M, Langer B. The successful application of osseointegrated implants to the posterior jaw: a long‐term retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993; 8: 428 – 432.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNevins M, Langer B. The successful use of osseointegrated implants for the treatment of the recalcitrant periodontal patient. J Periodontol 1995; 66: 150 – 157.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMisch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, et al. Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent 2008; 17: 5 – 15.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaney W. Glossary of oral and maxillofacial implants. Berlin: Quintessence, 2007.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLang NP, Berglundh T, Heitz‐Mayfield LJ, Pjetursson BE, Salvi GE, Sanz M. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding implant survival and complications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19 (Suppl): 150 – 154.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimonis P, Dufour T, Tenenbaum H. Long‐term implant survival and success: a 10–16‐year follow‐up of non‐submerged dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 772 – 777.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaroussis IK, Bragger U, Salvi GE, Burgin W, Lang NP. Effect of implant design on survival and success rates of titanium oral implants: a 10‐year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 8 – 17.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoccuzzo M, De Angelis N, Bonino L, Aglietta M. Ten‐year results of a three‐arm prospective cohort study on implants in periodontally compromised patients. Part 1: implant loss and radiographic bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 490 – 496.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLekholm U, Grondahl K, Jemt T. Outcome of oral implant treatment in partially edentulous jaws followed 20 years in clinical function. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006; 8: 178 – 186.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaroussis IK, Salvi GE, Heitz‐Mayfield LJ, Bragger U, Hammerle CH, Lang NP. Long‐term implant prognosis in patients with and without a history of chronic periodontitis: a 10‐year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14: 329 – 339.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerrigno N, Laureti M, Fanali S. Dental implants placement in conjunction with osteotome sinus floor elevation: a 12‐year life‐table analysis from a prospective study on 588 ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 194 – 205.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerglundh T, Persson L, Klinge B. A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. J Clin Periodontol 2002; 29 (Suppl 3 ): 197 – 212.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoldsland OC, Scheie AA, Aass AM. Prevalence of peri‐implantitis related to severity of the disease with different degrees of bone loss. J Periodontol 2010; 81: 231 – 238.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZitzmann NU, Berglundh T. Definition and prevalence of peri‐implant diseases. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35: 286 – 291.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoos‐Jansaker AM, Lindahl C, Renvert H, Renvert S. Nine‐ to fourteen‐year follow‐up of implant treatment. Part II: presence of peri‐implant lesions. J Clin Periodontol 2006; 33: 290 – 295.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSalvi GE, Bragger U. Mechanical and technical risks in implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24 (Suppl): 69 – 85.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLang NP, Wilson TG, Corbet EF. Biological complications with dental implants: their prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11 (Suppl 1 ): 146 – 155.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZurdo J, Romao C, Wennstrom JL. Survival and complication rates of implant‐supported fixed partial dentures with cantilevers: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20 (Suppl 4 ): 59 – 66.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuan H, van Staden R, Loo YC, Johnson N, Ivanovski S, Meredith N. Evaluation of multiple implant‐bone parameters on stress characteristics in the mandible under traumatic loading conditions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25: 461 – 472.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCardaropoli G, Wennstrom JL, Lekholm U. Peri‐implant bone alterations in relation to inter‐unit distances. A 3‐year retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14: 430 – 436.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWahlstrom M, Sagulin GB, Jansson LE. Clinical follow‐up of unilateral, fixed dental prosthesis on maxillary implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 1294 – 1300.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKinsel RP, Lin D. Retrospective analysis of porcelain failures of metal ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by 729 implants in 152 patients: patient‐specific and implant‐specific predictors of ceramic failure. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 101: 388 – 394.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90: 121 – 132.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMombelli A, van Oosten MA, Schurch E, Jr, Land NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1987; 2: 145 – 151.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShibli JA, Melo L, Ferrari DS, Figueiredo LC, Faveri M, Feres M. Composition of supra‐ and subgingival biofilm of subjects with healthy and diseased implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 975 – 982.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeonhardt A, Renvert S, Dahlen G. Microbial findings at failing implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10: 339 – 345.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrietzel FP, Reichart PA, Kale A, Kulkarni M, Wegner B, Kuchler I. Smoking interferes with the prognosis of dental implant treatment: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Clin Periodontol 2007; 34: 523 – 544.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeitz‐Mayfield LJ. Peri‐implant diseases: diagnosis and risk indicators. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35: 292 – 304.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLindhe J, Meyle J. Peri‐implant diseases: consensus report of the sixth european Workshop on periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35: 282 – 285.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerreira SD, Silva GL, Cortelli JR, Costa JE, Costa FO. Prevalence and risk variables for peri‐implant disease in Brazilian subjects. J Clin Periodontol 2006; 33: 929 – 935.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrocard D, Barthet P, Baysse E, et al. A multicenter report on 1,022 consecutively placed ITI implants: a 7‐year longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 691 – 700.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoldsland OC, Scheie AA, Aass AM. The association between selected risk indicators and severity of peri‐implantitis using mixed model analyses. J Clin Periodontol 2011; 38: 285 – 292.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeitz‐Mayfield LJ, Huynh‐Ba G. History of treated periodontitis and smoking as risks for implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24 (Suppl): 39 – 68.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBashutski JD, D'Silva NJ, Wang HL. Implant compression necrosis: current understanding and case report. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 700 – 704.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePaquette DW, Brodala N, Williams RC. Risk factors for endosseous dental implant failure. Dent Clin North Am 2006; 50: 361 – 374.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEriksson AR, Albrektsson T, Albrektsson B. Heat caused by drilling cortical bone. Temperature measured in vivo in patients and animals. Acta Orthop Scand 1984; 55: 629 – 631.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Van't Hof MA. Comparison of implant‐retained mandibular overdentures and conventional complete dentures: a 10‐year prospective study of clinical aspects and patient satisfaction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 879 – 885.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeydecke G, Thomason JM, Lund JP, Feine JS. The impact of conventional and implant supported prostheses on social and sexual activities in edentulous adults Results from a randomized trial 2 months after treatment. J Dent 2005; 33: 649 – 657.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAwad MA, Locker D, Korner‐Bitensky N, Feine JS. Measuring the effect of intra‐oral implant rehabilitation on health‐related quality of life in a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 1659 – 1663.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAwad MA, Lund JP, Shapiro SH, et al. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 390 – 396.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAwad MA, Lund JP, Dufresne E, Feine JS. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant‐retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle‐aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 117 – 122.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParlar A, Bosshardt DD, Cetiner D, et al. Effects of decontamination and implant surface characteristics on re‐osseointegration following treatment of peri‐implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 391 – 399.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRenvert S, Polyzois I, Maguire R. Re‐osseointegration on previously contaminated surfaces: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20 (Suppl 4 ): 216 – 227.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlhag M, Renvert S, Polyzois I, Claffey N. Re‐osseointegration on rough implant surfaces previously coated with bacterial biofilm: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 182 – 187.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePapapanou PN, Tonetti MS. Diagnosis and epidemiology of periodontal osseous lesions. Periodontol 2000 2000; 22: 8 – 21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldman H, Cohen W. The intrabony pocket, classification and treatment. J Periodontol 1958; 29: 272 – 281.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeinberg MA, Eskow RN. Osseous defects: proper terminology revisited. J Periodontol 2000; 71: 1928.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLarato DC. Intrabony defects in the dry human skull. J Periodontol 1970; 41: 496 – 498.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Bieling K, Sculean A, Becker J. Comparison of naturally occurring and ligature‐induced peri‐implantitis bone defects in humans and dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 161 – 170.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchou S, Berglundh T, Lang NP. Surgical treatment of peri‐implantitis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19 (Suppl): 140 – 149.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZitzmann NU, Scharer P, Marinello CP. Factors influencing the success of GBR. Smoking, timing of implant placement, implant location, bone quality and provisional restoration. J Clin Periodontol 1999; 26: 673 – 682.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwarz F, Sahm N, Schwarz K, Becker J. Impact of defect configuration on the clinical outcome following surgical regenerative therapy of peri‐implantitis. J Clin Periodontol 2010; 37: 449 – 455.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMombelli A, Feloutzis A, Bragger U, Lang NP. Treatment of peri‐implantitis by local delivery of tetracycline. Clinical, microbiological and radiological results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 287 – 294.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhoury F, Buchmann R. Surgical therapy of peri‐implant disease: a 3‐year follow‐up study of cases treated with 3 different techniques of bone regeneration. J Periodontol 2001; 72: 1498 – 1508.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRenvert S, Roos‐Jansaker AM, Claffey N. Non‐surgical treatment of peri‐implant mucositis and peri‐implantitis: a literature review. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35: 305 – 315.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRenvert S, Samuelsson E, Lindahl C, Persson GR. Mechanical non‐surgical treatment of peri‐implantitis: a double‐blind randomized longitudinal clinical study. I: clinical results. J Clin Periodontol 2009; 36: 604 – 609.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFaggion CM, Jr, Chambrone L, Gondim V, Schmitter M, Tu YK. Comparison of the effects of treatment of peri‐implant infection in animal and human studies: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 137 – 147.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEsposito M, Grusovin MG, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. The efficacy of interventions to treat peri‐implantitis: a Cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled clinical trials. Eur J Oral Implantol 2008; 1: 111 – 125.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePersson LG, Ericsson I, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Osseintegration following treatment of peri‐implantitis and replacement of implant components. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2001; 28: 258 – 263.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePersson LG, Araujo MG, Berglundh T, Grondahl K, Lindhe J. Resolution of peri‐implantitis following treatment. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10: 195 – 203.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHanisch O, Tatakis DN, Boskovic MM, Rohrer MD, Wikesjo UM. Bone formation and reosseointegration in peri‐implantitis defects following surgical implantation of rhBMP‐2. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12: 604 – 610.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWetzel AC, Vlassis J, Caffesse RG, Hammerle CH, Lang NP. Attempts to obtain re‐osseointegration following experimental peri‐implantitis in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10: 111 – 119.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMachado MA, Stefani CM, Sallum EA, Sallum AW, Tramontina VA, Nociti Junior FH. Treatment of ligature‐induced peri‐implantitis defects by regenerative procedures: a clinical study in dogs. J Oral Sci 1999; 41: 181 – 185.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeonhardt A, Dahlen G, Renvert S. Five‐year clinical, microbiological, and radiological outcome following treatment of peri‐implantitis in man. J Periodontol 2003; 74: 1415 – 1422.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEricsson I, Persson LG, Berglundh T, Edlund T, Lindhe J. The effect of antimicrobial therapy on periimplantitis lesions. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7: 320 – 328.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwarz F, Sahm N, Iglhaut G, Becker J. Impact of the method of surface debridement and decontamination on the clinical outcome following combined surgical therapy of peri‐implantitis: a randomized controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 2011; 38: 276 – 284.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKato T, Kusakari H, Hoshino E. Bactericidal efficacy of carbon dioxide laser against bacteria‐contaminated titanium implant and subsequent cellular adhesion to irradiated area. Lasers Surg Med 1998; 23: 299 – 309.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoncalves F, Zanetti AL, Zanetti RV, et al. Effectiveness of 980‐mm diode and 1,064‐nm extra‐long‐pulse neodymium‐doped yttrium aluminum garnet lasers in implant disinfection. Photomed Laser Surg 2010; 28: 273 – 280.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKreisler M, Kohnen W, Marinello C, et al. Bactericidal effect of the Er:YAG laser on dental implant surfaces: an in vitro study. J Periodontol 2002; 73: 1292 – 1298.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDortbudak O, Haas R, Bernhart T, Mailath‐Pokorny G. Lethal photosensitization for decontamination of implant surfaces in the treatment of peri‐implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 104 – 108.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAzzeh MM. Er,Cr:YSGG laser‐assisted surgical treatment of peri‐implantitis with 1‐year reentry and 18‐month follow‐up. J Periodontol 2008; 79: 2000 – 2005.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRomanos GE, Nentwig GH. Regenerative therapy of deep peri‐implant infrabony defects after CO2 laser implant surface decontamination. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008; 28: 245 – 255.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeppe H, Horch HH, Neff A. Conventional versus CO2 laser‐assisted treatment of peri‐implant defects with the concomitant use of pure‐phase beta‐tricalcium phosphate: a 5‐year clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 79 – 86.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRomeo E, Ghisolfi M, Murgolo N, Chiapasco M, Lops D, Vogel G. Therapy of peri‐implantitis with resective surgery. A 3‐year clinical trial on rough screw‐shaped oral implants. Part I: clinical outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 9 – 18.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGross M, Laufer BZ, Ormianar Z. An investigation on heat transfer to the implant‐bone interface due to abutment preparation with high‐speed cutting instruments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995; 10: 207 – 212.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSharon E, Shapira L, Wilensky A, Abu‐Hatoum R, Smidt A. Efficiency and thermal changes during implantoplasty in relation to bur type. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708‐8208.2011.00366.x.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHammerle CH, Fourmousis I, Winkler JR, Weigel C, Bragger U, Lang NP. Successful bone fill in late peri‐implant defects using guided tissue regeneration. A short communication. J Periodontol 1995; 66: 303 – 308.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMellonig JT, Triplett RG. Guided tissue regeneration and endosseous dental implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1993; 13: 108 – 119.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1708-8208.2011.00387.x.pdf
Size:
157.0KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.