Show simple item record

Effects of game technology on elementary student learning in mathematics

dc.contributor.authorShin, Namsooen_US
dc.contributor.authorSutherland, LeeAnn M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNorris, Cathleen A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSoloway, Ellioten_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-12T17:25:14Z
dc.date.available2013-09-03T15:38:27Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationShin, Namsoo; Sutherland, LeeAnn M.; Norris, Cathleen A.; Soloway, Elliot (2012). "Effects of game technology on elementary student learning in mathematics." British Journal of Educational Technology (4): 540-560. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/92095>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0007-1013en_US
dc.identifier.issn1467-8535en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/92095
dc.description.abstractThis paper reports the effects of game technology on student learning in mathematics as investigated in two data sets collected from slightly different subjects. In the first, 41 second graders (7 or 8 years old) from two classes used either a technology‐based game or a paper‐based game for 5 weeks. For the next 13 weeks, both classes used a technology‐based game either two times per week, or more than three times per week. A quasi‐experimental control‐group design with repeated measures analysis of variance and analysis of covariance was employed to explore performance differences between groups. The second study examined student learning in relation to characteristics such as their game performance, attitudes toward the game and toward mathematics, and gender and ethnicity. During a 4‐month period, 50 second grade students from three classes played a technology‐based game under conditions that varied depending on their teacher's direction. Multiple regression was used to determine the relationship between students' arithmetic scores and learner characteristics. Descriptive analyses by ability level, gender and ethnicity, and interview data about attitudes toward the technology game were also analyzed. Results from the two studies revealed that using a technology‐based game in the classroom was beneficial to students of all ability levels in learning arithmetic skills. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic •  Technology and games have yielded consistently positive results with regard to motivation, persistence, curiosity, attention and attitude toward learning. •  The accessibility and flexibility of handheld devices can provide students with more integral and spontaneous opportunities to fully take advantage of “off‐moments” from classroom activity to support learning. •  There are insufficient data to validate the contribution of technology to student learning. What this paper adds •  This paper provides evidence that game technology positively impacts elementary students' learning of arithmetic, regardless of ability level. •  The paper proposes research‐based design principles, generated from a literature review, to guide the development of individualized technology game environments to support student learning. •  This paper suggests various research methodologies to provide empirical evidence of the impact of technology on academic achievement. Implications for practice and/or policy •  To select appropriate games for target students, practitioners should consider the importance of clear goals and rules, flexible learner control and tasks at an appropriate level of challenge for the learner, with feedback provided. •  Teachers are more likely to implement technology if learning goals meet state or federally mandated standards for which teachers are already accountable. •  Identifying significant classroom variables (eg. teacher, student and classroom variables) is an important step in successfully implementing technology in educational settings. Further research is needed to understand how such variables influence learners' engagement in technology‐based games and which circumstances are most advantageous for successfully implementing technology‐based games in classrooms.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.titleEffects of game technology on elementary student learning in mathematicsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of North Texasen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/92095/1/bjet1197.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01197.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceBritish Journal of Educational Technologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRose, D. H., Meyer, A. & Hitchcock, C. ( 2005 ). The universally designed classroom: accessible curriculum and digital technologies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePearce, K., Lungren, M. & Wince, A. ( 1999 ). The effects of curriculum practices on first graders' attitudes, activity preference, and achievements in mathematics. Education, 119, 1, 82 – 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePiaget, J. & Inhelder, B. ( 1967 ). The Child's Conceptions of Space. Compton Printing Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQuintana, C., Shin, N., Norris, C. & Soloway, E. ( 2006 ). Learner‐centered design: reflections on the past and directions for the future. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 119 – 134 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRandel, J., Morris, B., Wetzel, C. & Whitehill, B. ( 1992 ). The effectiveness of games for educational purposes: a review of recent research. Simulation & Gaming, 23, 261 – 276.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRicci, K., Salas, E. & Cannon‐Bowers, J. A. ( 1996 ). Do computer‐based games facilitate knowledge acquisition and retention? Military Psychology, 8, 4, 295 – 307.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRieber, L. P. ( 1996 ). Seriously considering play: designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44, 43 – 58.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosas, R., Nussbaum, M., Cumsille, P., Marianov, V., Correa, M., Flores, P., et al. ( 2002 ). Beyond Nintendo: design and assessment of educational video games for first and second grade students. Computers & Education, 40, 71 – 94.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShin, N., Norris, C. & Soloway, E. ( 2006 ). Findings from early research on one‐to‐one handheld use in K‐12. In M. van't Hooft & K. Swan (Eds), Ubiquitous computing in education (pp. 19 – 39 ). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShin, N., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. ( 2006, June). Effects of handheld games on students learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Conference of Learning Sciences, Bloomington, IN.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShin, N., Stevens, S. Y. & Krajcik, J. ( 2010 ). Tracking student learning over time using Construct‐Centered Design. In S. Routledge (Ed.), Using analytical frameworks for classroom research: collecting data and analysing narrative (pp. 38 – 68 ). London: Taylor & Francis.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSutherland, L. M., Shin, N. & McCall, K. L. ( 2010 ). Integrating science inquiry, literacy, technology, and universal design for learning to enhance middle school students' opportunities to learn science. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Philadelphia, PA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThomas, P. & Macredie, R. ( 1994 ). Games and the design of human‐computer interfaces. Educational and Training Technology International, 31, 2, 134 – 142.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUrdan, T. C. & Maehr, M. L. ( 1995 ). Beyond a two‐goal theory of motivation and achievement: a case for social goals. Review of Educational Research, 65, 3, 213 – 243.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVogel, J. J., Vogel, D. S., Cannon‐Bowers, J., Bowers, C. A., Muse, K. & Wright, M. ( 2006 ). Computer gaming and interactive simulations for learning: a meta‐analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34, 3, 229 – 243.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVonesh, E. F. & Chinchilli, V. G. ( 1997 ). Linear and nonlinear models for the analysis of repeated measurements. London: Chapman and Hall.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVygotsky, L. S. ( 1978 ). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWagner, E. D. ( 1994 ). In support of a functional definition of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 8, 2, 6 – 29.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhitehall, B. & McDonald, B. ( 1993 ). Improving learning persistence of military personnel by enhancing motivation in a technical training program. Simulation & Gaming, 24, 294 – 313.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWolters, C. A., Yu, S. L. & Pintrich, P. R. ( 1996 ). The relation between goal orientation and students' motivational beliefs and self‐regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 3, 211 – 238.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBecker, K. ( 2007 ). Digital game‐based learning once removed: teaching teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 3, 478 – 488.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBloom, B. S. ( 1956 ). Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goal: handbook I. Cognitive domain. New York: Longmans, Green.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlumenfeld, P., Kempler, T. & Krajcik, J. ( 2006 ). Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 475 – 488 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBransford, J. D., Brown, A. L. & Cocking, R. R. (Eds) ( 2000 ). How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.).Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarter, J. F. ( 1993 ). Self‐management: education's ultimate goal. Teaching Exceptional Children, 25, 3, 28 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChandra, V. & Lloyd, M. ( 2008 ). The methodological nettle: ICT and student achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 6, 1087 – 1098.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChristmann, E. P. & Badgett, J. L. ( 2003 ). A meta‐analytic comparison of the effects of computer‐assisted instruction on elementary students' academic achievement. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 1, 91 – 104.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen, J. ( 1988 ). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCondie, R. & Munro, R. ( 2007 ). The impact of ICT in schools—a landscape review: Coventry, Becta. Retrieved April 18, 2011, from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20101102103654/publications.becta.org.uk//display.cfm?resID=28221en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCordova, D. I. & Lepper, M. R. ( 1996 ). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 715 – 730.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDempsey, J., Haynes, L., Lucassen, B. & Casey, M. ( 2002 ). Forty simple computer games and what they could mean to educators. Simulation & Gaming, 33, 2, 157 – 168.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A. & Shouse, A. W. (Eds) ( 2007 ). Taking science to school: learning and teaching science in grades K‐8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDynarski, M., Agodini, R., Heaviside, S., Novak, T., Carey, N., Campuzano, L., et al. ( 2007 ) Effectiveness of reading and mathematics software products: findings from the first student cohort (Publication No. 2007‐4005). Retrieved October 26, 2010, from Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, website: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pdf/20074005.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEck, R. V. ( 2006 ). The effect of contextual pedagogical advisement and competition on middle‐school students' attitude toward mathematics and mathematics instruction using a computer‐based simulation game. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25, 2, 165 – 195.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinn, M. & Vandenham, N. ( 2004 ). The handheld classroom: educational implications of mobile computing. Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 2, 1, 1 – 15.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarris, R., Ahlers, R. & Driskell, J. E. ( 2002 ). Games, motivation, and learning: a research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33, 4, 441 – 467.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoon, T. S., Chong, T. S. & Binti Ngah, N. A. ( 2010 ). Effect of an interactive courseware in the learning matrices. Educational Technology & Society, 13, 1, 121 – 132.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInal, Y. & Cagiltay, K. ( 2007 ). Flow experiences of children in an interactive social game environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 3, 455 – 464.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKahveci, M. & Imamoglu, Y. ( 2007 ). Interactive learning in mathematics education: review of recent literature. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 26, 2, 137 – 153.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKernan, M. C. & Lord, R. G. ( 1990 ). Effects of valence, expectancies, and goal‐performance discrepancies in single and multiple goal environments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 194 – 203.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKinzie, M. B. & Joseph, D. R. D. ( 2008 ). Gender differences in game activity preferences of middle school children: implications for educational game design. Education Technology Research & Development, 56, 5/6, 6443 – 6663.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLocke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. ( 1990 ). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcFarlane, A., Sparowhawk, A. & Heald, Y. ( 2002 ). Report on the educational use of games: an exploration by TEEM of the contribution which games can make to the education process. Retrieved April 18, 2011, from http://www.teem.org.uk/publications/teem_gamesined_full.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeans, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M. & Jones, K. ( 2009 ). Evaluation of evidence‐based practices in online learning: a meta‐analysis and review of online‐learning studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved October 27, 2010, from http://www.educause.edu/Resources/EvaluationofEvidenceBasedPract/174235en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller, D. J. & Robertson, D. P. ( 2010 ). Using a games console in the primary classroom: effects of “Brain Training” programme on computation and self‐esteem. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 2, 242 – 255.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorrison, G. R., Ross, S. M. & Baldwin, W. ( 1992 ). Learner control of context and instructional support in learning elementary school mathematics. Educational Technology, Research, & Development, 40, 5 – 13.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNorris, C., Shin, N. & Soloway, E. ( 2007 ). Educational technology for the mainstream: a call for designing for simplicity and reliability. Educational Technology Magazine, 47, 3, 6 – 9.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.