View Item 

Show simple item record

Designing a pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial for developing an adaptive treatment strategy

dc.contributor.authorAlmirall, Danielen_US
dc.contributor.authorCompton, Scott N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGunlicks‐stoessel, Meredithen_US
dc.contributor.authorDuan, Naihuaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Susan A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-09T14:56:40Z
dc.date.available2013-09-03T15:38:27Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-07-30en_US
dc.identifier.citationAlmirall, Daniel; Compton, Scott N.; Gunlicks‐stoessel, Meredith ; Duan, Naihua; Murphy, Susan A. (2012). "Designing a pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial for developing an adaptive treatment strategy." Statistics in Medicine 31(17): 1887-1902. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/92434>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0277-6715en_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0258en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/92434
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltden_US
dc.subject.otherDynamic Treatment Regimesen_US
dc.subject.otherPiloten_US
dc.subject.otherAdaptiveen_US
dc.subject.otherIndividualizeden_US
dc.subject.otherInterventionen_US
dc.subject.otherExperimentalen_US
dc.titleDesigning a pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial for developing an adaptive treatment strategyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelStatistics and Numeric Dataen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid22438190en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/92434/1/sim4512.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/sim.4512en_US
dc.identifier.sourceStatistics in Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios LP, Robson R, Thabane M, Giangregorio L, Goldsmith CH. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Medical Research Methodology Jan 2010; 10 ( 1 ). http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471‐2288/10/1.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWahed AS, Tsiatis AA. Optimal estimator for the survival distribution and related quantities for treatment policies in two‐stage randomization designs in clinical trials. Biometrics 2004; 60: 124 – 133.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBembon O, van der Laan MJ. Analyzing sequentially randomized trials based on causal effect models for realistic individualized treatment rules. Statistics in Medicine Aug 2008; 27 ( 19 ): 3689 – 3716.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCain LE, Robins JM, Lanoy E, Logan R, Costagliola D, Hernán MA. When to Start Treatment? A Systematic Approach to the Comparison of Dynamic Regimes Using Observational Data. The International Journal of Biostatistics 2010; 6 ( 2 ). Article No. 18.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurphy SA, Bingham D. Screening Experiments for Developing Dynamic Treatment Regimes. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2009; 184: 391 – 408.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThall PF, Millikan RE, Sung HG. Evaluating multiple treatment courses in clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine Apr 2000; 19 ( 8 ): 1011 – 1028.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurphy SA. An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies. Statistics in Medicine May 2005; 24 ( 10 ): 1455 – 1481.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLavori PW, Dawson R. Improving the efficiency of estimation in randomized trials of adaptive treatment strategies. Clinical Trials 2007; 4 ( 4 ): 297 – 308.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLavori PW, Dawson R. Adaptive treatment strategies in chronic disease. Annual Review of Medicine 2008; 59: 443 – 453.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInstitute of Medicine. 100 Initial Priority Topics for Comparative Effectiveness Research. http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2009/ComparativeEffectivenessResearchPriorities.aspx.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchneider LS, Tariot PN, Lyketsos CG, Dagerman KS, Davis KL, Davis S, Hsiao JK, Jeste DV, Katz IR, Olin JT, Pollock BG, Rabins PV, Rosenheck RA, Small GW, Lebowitz B, Lieberman JA. National Institute of Mental Health Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE): Alzheimer disease trial methodology. American Journalof Geriatric Psychiatry Fall 2001; 9 ( 4 ): 346 – 360.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLavori PW, Rush AJ, Wisniewski SR, et al. Strengthening clinical effectiveness trials: equipoise‐stratified randomization. Biological Psychiatry Nov 2001; 50 ( 10 ): 792 – 801.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRush AJ, Crismon ML, Kashner TM, Toprac MG, Carmody TJ, Trivedi MH, Suppes T, Miller AL, Biggs MM, Shores‐Wilson K, Witte BP, Shon SP, Rago WV, Altshuler KZ, TMAP Research Group. Texas Medication Algorithm Project, phase 3 (TMAP‐3): rationale and study design. Journal ofClinical Psychiatry Apr 2003; 64 ( 4 ): 357 – 369.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStone RM, Berg DT, George SL, Dodge RK, Paciucci PA, Schulman P, Lee EJ, Moore JO, Powell BL, Schiffer CA. Granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor after initial chemotherapy for elderly patients with primary acute myelogenous leukemia.Cancer and Leukemia Group B. New England Journal of Medicine Jun 1995; 332 ( 25 ): 1671 – 1677.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVogt WP. Dictionary of statistics and methodology: a nontechnical guide for the social sciences. Sage Publications: Newbury Park, California, 1993.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollins LM, Murphy SA, Nair VN, Strecher VJ. A strategy for optimizing and evaluating behavioral interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine Aug 2005; 30 ( 1 ): 65 – 73.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKraemer HC, Mintz J, Noda A, Tinklenberg J, Yesavage JA. Caution regarding the use of pilot studies to guide power calculations for study proposals. Archives of General Psychiatry May 2006; 63 ( 5 ): 484 – 489.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice May 2004; 10 ( 2 ): 307 – 312.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeon AC, Davis LL, Kraemer HC. The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research. Journal of Psychiatric Research May 2011; 45 ( 5 ): 626 – 629.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWittes J, Brittain E. The role of internal pilot studies in increasing the efficiency of clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine 1990; 9: 65 – 72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWittes JT, Schabenberger O, Zucker DM, Brittain E, Proschan M. Internal pilot studies I: type I error rate of the naïve t ‐test. Statistics in Medicine 1999; 18: 3481 – 3491.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZucker DM, Wittes JT, Schabenberger O, Brittain E. Internal pilot studies II: comparison of various procedures. Statistics in Medicine 1999; 18: 3493 – 3509.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNahum‐Shani I, Qian M, Almirall D, Pelham WE, Gnagy B, Fabiano G, Waxmonsky J, Yu J, Murphy SA. Q‐Learning: a data analysis method for constructing adaptive interventions. Pennsylvania State University Methodology Center Technical Report Series. No. 10‐107.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerry SM, Carlin BP, Lee JJ, Muller P. Bayesian adaptive methods for clinical trials. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThe Methodology Center Perspective. Ask a Methodologist Spring 2011; Methodology Center, Pennsylvania State University, http://methcenter.psu.edu.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuy W. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. National Institute of Mental Health: Rockville, MD, 1976.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKraemer HC, Stice E, Kazdin A, Offord D, Kupfer D. How do risk factors work together? Mediators, moderators, and independent, overlapping, and proxy risk factors. American Journal of Psychiatry Jun 2001; 158 ( 6 ): 848 – 856.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. http://www.R‐project.org/.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInsel TR. Translating scientific opportunity into public health impact: a strategic plan for research on mental illness. Archives of General Psychiatry Feb 2009; 66 ( 2 ): 128 – 133.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBirmaher B. Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with depressive disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Nov 2007; 46 ( 11 ): 1503 – 1526.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConnolly SD, Bernstein GA, Work Group on Quality Issues. Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with anxiety disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Feb 2007; 46 ( 2 ): 267 – 283.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurphy SA, Lynch KG, Oslin D, Mckay JR, TenHave T. Developing adaptive treatment strategies in substance abuse. Drug and Alcohol Dependence May 2007; 88: S24–S30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurphy SA, Collins LM, Rush AJ. Customizing treatment to the patient: Adaptive treatment strategies. Drug and Alcohol Dependence May 2007; 88: S1 – S3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDawson R, Lavori PW. Placebo‐free designs for evaluating new mental health treatments: the use of adaptive treatment strategies. Statistics in Medicine Nov 2004; 23 ( 21 ): 3249 – 3262.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLavori PW, Dawson R, Rush AJ. Flexible treatment strategies in chronic disease: clinical and research implications. Biological Psychiatry Sep 2000; 48 ( 6 ): 605 – 614.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurphy SA, Almirall D. Dynamic Treatment Regimens. In Encyclopedia of Medical Decision Making, Kattan MW (ed.). Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, 2009.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLavori PW, Dawson R. Dynamic treatment regimes: practical design considerations. Clinical Trials Feb 2004; 1 ( 1 ): 9 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurphy SA. Optimal dynamic treatment regimes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 2003; 65: 331 – 355.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHernán MA, Lanoy E, Costagliola D, Robins JM. Comparison of Dynamic Treatment Regimes via Inverse Probability Weighting. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology 2006; 98: 237 – 242.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoodie EEM, Richardson TS, Stephens DA. Demystifying optimal dynamic treatment regimes. Biometrics 2007; 63: 447 – 455.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurphy SA, van der Laan MJ, Robins JM, CPPRG. Marginal Mean Models for Dynamic Regimes. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2001; 96: 1410 – 1423.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrellana L, Rotnitzky A, Robins JM. Dynamic Regime Marginal Structural Mean Models for Estimation of Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes, Part I: Main Content. The International Journal of Biostatistics 2010; 6 ( 2 ). Article No. 8, http://www.bepress.com/ijb/vol6/iss2/8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrellana L, Rotnitzky A, Robins JM. Dynamic Regime Marginal Structural Mean Models for Estimation of Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes, Part II: Proofs of Results. The International Journal of Biostatistics 2010; 6 ( 2 ). Article No. 9, http://www.bepress.com/ijb/vol6/iss2/9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobins JM. Optimal structural nested models for optimal sequential decisions. In Proceedings of the Second Seattle Symposium on Biostatistics, Lin DY, Heagerty PJ (eds.). Springer: New York, 2004.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan der Laan MJ, Petersen ML, Joffe MM. History‐Adjusted Marginal Structural Models and Statically‐Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes. The International Journal of Biostatistics 2005; 1 ( 1 ). Article No. 4. http://www.bepress.com/ijb/vol11/iss1/4.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
sim4512.pdf
Size:
611.4KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.