Show simple item record

On the Behavior of the Geomagnetic Field During the Miocene

dc.contributor.authorDominguez, Ada
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-21T21:59:13Z
dc.date.available2012-08-21T21:59:13Z
dc.date.issued2012-08-21
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/92475
dc.descriptionThesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciencesen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study comprises 118 discrete volcanic flows from the Miocene in the eastern Columbia River Basalt Group (CRBG) with the aim of testing the distributions of geomagnetic field directions as predicted by several geomagnetic field models. This is important because little is known empiri- cally about the behavior of the geomagnetic field prior to the last 5 million years. The results of this study will allow us not only to extend the temporal coverage of the geomagnetic field models, but also point to potential improvements to these models. The rock magnetic analysis of the samples for this collection shows that the primary magnetic directions are uniformly carried by titano-magnetite. Thus, the magnetic behavior of the samples reflects the magnetic field and not aspects of the mag- netic mineralogy. To reduce systematic bias, the sites were analyzed as ungrouped and grouped site directions, where flows with similar directions within the 95% confidence interval were combined. Further- more, they were analyzed with visual inspection, 45°, and Vandamme (1994) cutoff criteria. The overall formation mean of these six scenarios shows that the paleomagnetic directions of the flows are southerly and up and northerly and down. For example, in the case of grouped sites with the Vandamme cutoff, the normal (Dec: 7.1, Inc: 60.5, k: 29.4, 95: 4.1), and reverse (Dec: 177.6, Inc: -59.6, k: 15.7, 95: 5.6) means depict this general behavior. For reference, the local inclination of the geocentric co-axial dipole field is about 64. Furthermore, deviating directions are also pre- sent, possibly due to excursions as part of secular variation, or as intermediate transitions between reversed and normal polarity intervals. No new rock ages were necessary for this study since the CRBG has undergone extensive geochronological analysis with high-quality, reproducible results. Additionally, integrating the Miocene ages of the flows and their corresponding paleomagnetic di- rections allows us to observe the evolution of the paleosecular variation (PSV) through the Neogene, because it can be compared with the published characteristics of the geomagnetic field in the last 5 million years. Our elongation results coincide with those predicted from the TK03.GAD (Tauxe & Kent, 2004) model, but not the CJ98.GAD (Constable & Johnson, 1998) model. However, when comparing our dispersion results, we find that they do not conform to the TK03.GAD, CJ98.GAD, and CP88.GAD (Constable & Parker, 1988) models, which underpredict the dispersion values. Thus, this suggests that, although the geomagnetic parameters in general agree with these models, they require some refinement to accommodate the differences during the Miocene.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleOn the Behavior of the Geomagnetic Field During the Mioceneen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeological Sciences
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.contributor.affiliationumEarth and Environmental Sciences, Department ofen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/92475/1/Dominguez_Ada_MS_2012.pdf
dc.owningcollnameEarth and Environmental Sciences, Department of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.