Show simple item record

“The Experience of Left and Right” Meets the Physics of Left and Right

dc.contributor.authorJohn Baker, Daviden_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-05T14:46:17Z
dc.date.available2013-10-18T17:47:30Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationJohn Baker, David (2012). " “The Experience of Left and Right” Meets the Physics of Left and Right ." Noûs 46(3). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/93584>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0029-4624en_US
dc.identifier.issn1468-0068en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/93584
dc.description.abstractI consider an argument, due to Geoffrey Lee, that we can know  a priori   from the left‐right asymmetrical character of experience that our brains are left‐right asymmetrical. Lee's argument assumes a premise he calls  relationism , which I show is well‐supported by the best philosophical picture of spacetime. I explain why Lee's relationism is compatible with left‐right asymmetrical laws. I then show that the conclusion of Lee's argument is not as strong or surprising as he makes it out to be.en_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.title“The Experience of Left and Right” Meets the Physics of Left and Righten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhilosophyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanitiesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/93584/1/j.1468-0068.2010.00814.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00814.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceNoûsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKant, Immanuel ( 1992 1768 ), “ Concerning the ultimate ground of the differentiation of directions in space,” in Waldorf, D. and R. Meerbote (eds.), The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant: Theoretical Philosophy 1755‐1770, Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 377 – 416.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSkow, Bradford ( 2007 ), “ Are Shapes Intrinsic? Philosophical Studies 133: 111 – 130.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePooley, Oliver ( 2003 ), “ Handedness, parity violation, and the reality of space,” in Brading, Katherine and Elena Castellani (eds.), Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections, Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 250 – 280.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEarman, John and Gordon Belot ( 2001 ), “ Pre‐Socratic Quantum Gravity,” in Callender, C. and N. Huggett (eds.), Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale, 213 – 255.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEarman, John and John Norton ( 1987 ), “ What Price Spacetime Substantivalism? The Hole Story,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38: 515 – 525.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGardner, Martin ( 2005 ), The Ambidextrous Universe, New York: Dover.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoefer, Carl ( 2000 ), “ Kant's hands and Earman's pions: chirality arguments for substantival space,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14: 237 – 256.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuggett, Nick ( 2000 ), “ Reflections on parity non‐conservation,” Philosophy of Science 67: 219 – 241.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee, Geoffrey ( 2006 ), “ The Experience of Left and Right,” in Hawthorne, John and Tamar Szabo Gendler (eds.), Perceptual Experience, Oxford: Oxford UP, 291 – 315.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.