How do stream organisms respond to, and influence, the concentration of titanium dioxide nanoparticles? A mesocosm study with algae and herbivores
dc.contributor.author | Kulacki, Konrad J. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Cardinale, Bradley J. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Keller, Arturo A. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Bier, Raven | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Dickson, Helen | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-10-02T17:19:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-11-04T19:53:16Z | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2012-10 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Kulacki, Konrad J.; Cardinale, Bradley J.; Keller, Arturo A.; Bier, Raven; Dickson, Helen (2012). "How do stream organisms respond to, and influence, the concentration of titanium dioxide nanoparticles? A mesocosm study with algae and herbivores." Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 31(10): 2414-2422. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/93650> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0730-7268 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1552-8618 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/93650 | |
dc.description.abstract | The biologically active properties of many nanomaterials, coupled with their rapidly expanding production and use, has generated concern that certain types of nanoparticles could have unintended impacts when released into natural ecosystems. In the present study, the authors report the results of an experiment in which they grew three common species of stream algae as monocultures and together as polycultures in the biofilms of stream mesocosms that were exposed to 0, 0.1, or 1.0 ppm nanoparticle titanium dioxide (nTiO 2 ). The nTiO 2 did not alter the growth trajectory of any algal biofilm over 10+ generations. However, Ti accrual in biofilms not only differed among the algal species but was also higher in polycultures than in the average monoculture. Variation in accrual among species compositions was readily predicted by differences in the total biomass achieved by the different biofilms. When biofilms were fed to the herbivorous snail Physa acuta at the end of the experiment, initial concentrations of nTiO 2 did not alter short‐term rates of herbivory. However, because of differences in palatability among the algae, biofilm composition influenced the amount of nTiO 2 that accumulated in the herbivore tissue. The results have important implications for understanding how efficiently nTiO 2 is removed from surface waters and the potential transfer of nanomaterials to higher trophic levels. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2012; 31: 2414–2422. © 2012 SETAC | en_US |
dc.publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Physa Acuta | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Stream | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Metal Oxide | en_US |
dc.subject.other | TiO 2 | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Nanoparticle | en_US |
dc.title | How do stream organisms respond to, and influence, the concentration of titanium dioxide nanoparticles? A mesocosm study with algae and herbivores | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Natural Resources and Environment | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Biological Chemistry | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California–Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California–Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California–Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 22847763 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/93650/1/1962_ftp.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/etc.1962 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Watanabe MM. 2005. Freshwater culture media. In Andersen RA, ed, Algal Culturing Techniques. Academic, New York, NY, USA, pp 13 – 20. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Adams LK, Lyon DY, Alvarez PJ. 2006. Comparative eco‐toxicity of nanoscale TiO 2, SiO 2, and ZnO water suspensions. Water Res 40: 3527 – 3532. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Battin TJ, Kammer FVD, Weilhartner A, Ottofuelling S, Hofmann T. 2009. Nanostructured TiO 2: Transport behavior and effects on aquatic microbial communities under environmental conditions. Environ Sci Technol 43: 8098 – 8104. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Aruoja V, Dubourguier HC, Kasemets K, Kahru A. 2009. Toxicity of nanoparticles of CuO, ZnO, and TiO 2 to microalgae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Sci Total Environ 407: 1461 – 1468. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Metzler DM, Li MH, Erdem A, Huang CP. 2011. Responses of algae to photocatalytic nano‐TiO 2 particles with an emphasis on the effect of particle size. Chem Eng J 170: 538 – 546. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Keller AA, Wang HT, Zhou DX, Lenihan HS, Cherr G, Cardinale BJ, Miller R, Ji ZX. 2010. Stability and aggregation of metal oxide nanoparticles in natural aqueous matrices. Environ Sci Technol 44: 1962 – 1967. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cardinale BJ. 2011. Biodiversity improves water quality through niche partitioning. Nature 472: 86 – 89. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Steinman AD, McIntire CD. 1986. Effects of current velocity and light energy on the structure of periphyton assemblages in laboratory streams. J Phycol 22: 352 – 361. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Trainor FR, Cain JR, Shubert LE. 1976. Morphology and nutrition of colonial green‐alga Scenedesmus —80 years later. Bot Rev 42: 5 – 25. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mulholland PJ, Steinman AD, Marzolf ER, Hart DR, Deangelis DL. 1994. Effect of periphyton biomass on hydraulic characteristics and nutrient cycling in streams. Oecologia 98: 40 – 47. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Pennak RW. 1978. Freshwater Invertebrates of the United States. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lowe RL, Hunter RD. 1988. Effect of grazing by Physa integra on periphyton community structure. J North Am Benthol Soc 7: 29 – 36. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Vogel S, LaBarbera M. 1978. Simple flow tanks for research and teaching. Bioscience 28: 638 – 645. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Peterson CG, Stevenson RJ. 1992. Resistance and resilience of lotic algal communities—Importance of disturbance timing and current. Ecology 73: 1445 – 1461. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Passy SI. 2001. Spatial paradigms of lotic diatom distribution: A landscape ecology perspective. J Phycol 37: 370 – 378. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hashimoto K, Irie H, Fujishima A. 2005. TiO 2 photocatalysis: A historical overview and future prospects. Jpn J Appl Phys 44: 8269 – 8285. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Colvin VL. 2003. The potential environmental impact of engineered nanomaterials. Nat Biotechnol 21: 1166 – 1170. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hillebrand H, Durselen CD, Kirschtel D, Pollingher U, Zohary T. 1999. Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae J Phycol 35: 403 – 424. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Menard A, Drobne D, Jemec A. 2011. Ecotoxicity of nanosized TiO 2. Review of in vivo data. Environ Pollut 159: 677 – 684. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hund‐Rinke K, Simon M. 2006. Ecotoxic effect of photocatalytic active nanoparticles TiO 2 on algae and daphnids. Environ Sci Pollut Res 13: 225 – 232. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Warheit DB, Hoke RA, Finlay C, Donner EM, Reed KL, Sayes CM. 2007. Development of a base set of toxicity tests using ultrafine TiO 2 particles as a component of nanoparticle risk management. Toxicol Lett 171: 99 – 110. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sadiq IM, Dalai S, Chandrasekaran N, Mukherjee A. 2011. Ecotoxicity study of titania (TiO 2 ) NPs on two microalgae species: Scenedesmus sp. and Chlorella sp. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 74: 1180 – 1187. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Brunet L, Lyon D, Hotze EM, Alvarez PJJ, Wiesner MR. 2009. Comparative photoactivity and antibacterial properties of C60 fullerenes and titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol 43: 4355 – 4360. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Reeves JF, Davies SJ, Dodd NJF, Jha AN. 2008. Hydroxyl radicals (·OH) are associated with titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ) nanoparticle‐induced cytotoxicity and oxidative DNA damage in fish cells. Mutat Res Fundam Mol Mech Mutagen 640: 113 – 122. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kim SC, Lee DK. 2005. Preparation of TiO 2 ‐coated hollow glass beads and their application to the control of algal growth in eutrophic water. Microchem J 80: 227 – 232. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hong FH, Zhou J, Liu C, Yang F, Wu C, Zheng L, Yang P. 2005. Effect of nano‐TiO 2 on photochemical reaction of chloroplasts of spinach. Biol Trace Elem Res 105: 269 – 279. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lei Z, Su MY, Xiao W, Chao L, Qu CX, Liang C, Hao H, Liu XQ, Hong FS. 2007. Effects of nano‐anatase on spectral characteristics and distribution of LHCII on the thylakoid membranes of spinach. Biol Trace Elem Res 120: 273 – 283. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hooper DU, Perrings C, Venail P, Narwani A, Mace GM, Tilman D, Wardle DA, Kinzig AP, Daily GC, Loreau M, Grace JB, Larigauderie A, Srivastava DS, Naeem S. 2012. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486: 59 – 67. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cardinale BJ, Matulich KL, Hooper DU, Byrnes JE, Duffy E, Gamfeldt L, Balvanera P, O'Connor MI, Gonzalez A. 2011. The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. Am J Bot 98: 572 – 592. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ferry JL, Craig P, Hexel C, Sisco P, Frey R, Pennington PL, Fulton MH, Scott IG, Decho AW, Kashiwada S, Murphy CJ, Shaw TJ. 2009. Transfer of gold nanoparticles from the water column to the estuarine food web. Nat Nanotechnol 4: 441 – 444. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Rejeski D. 2009. Project on emerging nanotechnologies. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Consumer Product Safety Commission, Bethesda, MD. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Farre M, Gajda‐Schrantz K, Kantiani L, Barcelo D. 2009. Ecotoxicity and analysis of nanomaterials in the aquatic environment. Anal Bioanal Chem 393: 81 – 95. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Handy RD, Shaw BJ. 2007. Toxic effects of nanoparticles and nanomaterials: Implications for public health, risk assessment, and the public perception of nanotechnology. Health Risk Soc 9: 125 – 144. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Nel A, Xia T, Madler L, Li N. 2006. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311: 622 – 627. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Scown TM, van Aerle R, Tyler CR. 2010. Do engineered nanoparticles pose a significant threat to the aquatic environment ? Crit Rev Toxicol 40: 653 – 670. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Guzman KAD, Taylor MR, Banfield JF. 2006. Environmental risks of nanotechnology: National Nanotechnology Initiative Funding, 2000–2004. Environ Sci Technol 40: 1401 – 1407. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Warheit DB. 2010. Debunking some misconceptions about nanotoxicology. Nano Lett 10: 4777 – 4782. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Handy RD, Owen R, Valsami‐Jones E. 2008. The ecotoxicology of nanoparticles and nanomaterials: Current status, knowledge gaps, challenges, and future needs. Ecotoxicology 17: 315 – 325. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mueller NC, Nowack B. 2008. Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 42: 4447 – 4453. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Borm P, Robbins D, Haubold S, Kuhlbusch T, Fissan H, Donaldson K, Schins R, Stone V, Kreyling W, Lademann J, Krutmann J, Warheit D, Oberdorster E. 2006. The potential risks of nanomaterials: A review carried out for ECETOC. Part Fibre Toxicol 3: 1 – 35. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ju‐Nam Y, Lead JR. 2008. Manufactured nanoparticles: An overview of their chemistry, interactions, and potential environmental implications. Sci Total Environ 400: 396 – 414. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kaegi R, Ulrich A, Sinnet B, Vonbank R, Wichser A, Zuleeg S, Simmler H, Brunner S, Vonmont H, Burkhardt M, Boller M. 2008. Synthetic TiO 2 nanoparticle emission from exterior facades into the aquatic environment. Environ Pollut 156: 233 – 239. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.