Show simple item record

Prospective Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction, and Surgeon and Patient Trainer Assessment of the Coloplast Titan One Touch Release Three‐Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis

dc.contributor.authorOhl, Dana A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBrock, Geralden_US
dc.contributor.authorRalph, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorBogache, Williamen_US
dc.contributor.authorJones, LeRoyen_US
dc.contributor.authorMunarriz, Ricardoen_US
dc.contributor.authorLevine, Laurenceen_US
dc.contributor.authorRitenour, Chaden_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-02T17:20:00Z
dc.date.available2013-10-18T17:47:30Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationOhl, Dana A.; Brock, Gerald; Ralph, David; Bogache, William; Jones, LeRoy; Munarriz, Ricardo; Levine, Laurence; Ritenour, Chad (2012). "Prospective Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction, and Surgeon and Patient Trainer Assessment of the Coloplast Titan One Touch Release Three‐Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis." The Journal of Sexual Medicine 9(9). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/93661>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1743-6095en_US
dc.identifier.issn1743-6109en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/93661
dc.description.abstractIntroduction.  A single‐armed, prospective, multicenter international study evaluated the redesigned Coloplast Titan One Touch Release (OTR) pump inflatable penile prosthesis. The OTR pump has a unique release valve that permits deflation of the implant with one squeeze of opposing touch pads. Aims.  To assess the impact of a new penile prosthesis design, the Titan OTR, on patient ease of operation. Furthermore, to assess patient satisfaction, surgeon acceptance, and the ease with which patients were trained in device operation in the clinic setting. Methods.  A total of 113 eligible patients from eight centers were recruited from men presenting with erectile dysfunction without prior prosthetic implantation. The subjects had a mean age of 61 years, and had a number of comorbidities, including diabetes (31.9%), hypertension (34.5%), and Peyronie's disease (23.9%). All underwent implantation of the study device. Main Outcome Measures.  Questionnaires were used to capture patient satisfaction as well as physician feedback on ease of implantation and patient education. A paired analysis was completed for patient satisfaction at 6 (N = 96) and 12 (N = 90) months. Results.  Overall satisfaction with the device was 90.6% and 90.0% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. The primary end point, ease of deflation, was seen in 70.8% and 73.3% at these two time points, with the 12‐month value statistically better than historical controls. Physicians overwhelmingly reported straightforward/simple intraoperative product preparation (97.3%) and equivalent or easier training compared with their previous pump of choice (96.4%). Adverse events for all subjects (N = 113) included removal of the device in four cases (3.5%) for infection and one case for chronic pain (0.8%). Conclusions.  The Titan OTR represents an advance in penile prosthetic technology that is well accepted by patients and physicians. The study design allowed for realistic evaluation of the new technology aimed at enhancing clinical outcomes. Ohl DA, Brock G, Ralph D, Bogache W, Jones L, Munarriz R, Levine L, and Ritenour C. Prospective evaluation of patient satisfaction, and surgeon and patient trainer assessment of the Coloplast Titan One Touch Release three‐piece inflatable penile prosthesis. J Sex Med 2012;9:2467–2474.en_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherSurgical Treatmenten_US
dc.subject.otherPatient Satisfactionen_US
dc.subject.otherThree‐Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesisen_US
dc.subject.otherErectile Dysfunctionen_US
dc.titleProspective Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction, and Surgeon and Patient Trainer Assessment of the Coloplast Titan One Touch Release Three‐Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelUrologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Sexual and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBoston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canadaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSt. Peter's Hospital and the Institute of Urology, University College London, London, UKen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCarolina Urologic Research, Myrtle Beach, SC, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUrology San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid22759540en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/93661/1/j.1743-6109.2012.02819.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02819.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe Journal of Sexual Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorales A, Gingell C, Collins M, Wicker PA, Osterloh IH. Clinical safety of oral sildenafil citrate (VIAGRA) in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 1998; 10: 69 – 73.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHollenbeck BK, Miller DC, Ohl DA. The utility of lockout valve reservoirs in preventing autoinflation in penile prostheses. Int Urol Nephrol 2002; 34: 379 – 83.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoscovic DJ, Gittens P, Avila D, Chandrashekar A, Khera M, Lipshultz LI. Favorable female sexual function is associated with patient satisfaction after inflatable penile prosthesis implantation. J Sex Med 2011; 8: 1996 – 2001.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKramer AC, Schweber A. Patient expectations prior to Coloplast Titan penile prosthesis implant predicts postoperative satisfaction. J Sex Med 2010; 7: 2261 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRajpurkar A, Dhabuwala CB. Comparison of satisfaction rates and erectile function in patients treated with sildenafil, intracavernous prostaglandin E1 and penile implant surgery for erectile dysfunction in urology practice. J Urol 2003; 170: 159 – 263.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShaw T, Garber BB. Coloplast Titan inflatable penile prosthesis with One‐Touch Release pump: Review of 100 cases and comparison with Genesis pump. J Sex Med 2011; 8: 310 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQuallich SA, Ohl DA, Dunn RL. Evaluation of three penile prosthesis pump designs in a blinded survey of practitioners. Urol Nurs 2008; 28: 101 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHatzimouratidis K, Hatzichristou DG. A comparative review of the options for treatment of erectile dysfunction: Which treatment for which patient? Drugs 2005; 65: 1621 – 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC. Sexual dysfunction in the United States: Prevalence and predictors. JAMA 1999; 281: 537 – 44.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeldman HA, Goldstein I, Hatzichristou DG, Krane RJ, McKinlay JB. Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: Results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Urol 1994; 151: 54 – 61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHellstrom WJG, Montague DK, Moncada I, Carson C, Minhas S, Faria G, Krishnamurti S. Implants, mechanical devices, and vascular surgery for erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med 2010; 7: 501 – 23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJensen JB, Madsen SS, Larsen EH, Jensen KM, Kirkeby HJ. Patient and partner satisfaction with the Mentor Alpha‐1 inflatable penile prosthesis. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2005; 39: 66 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldstein I, Newman L, Baum N, Brooks M, Chaikin L, Goldberg K, McBride A, Krane RJ. Safety and efficacy outcome of Mentor alpha‐1 inflatable penile prosthesis implantation for impotence treatment. J Urol 1997; 157: 833 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDhabuwala C, Sheth S, Zamzow B. Infection rates of rifampin/gentamicin‐coated Titan Coloplast penile implants. Comparision with Inhibizone‐impregnated AMS penile implants. J Sex Med 2011; 8: 315 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrinkman MJ, Henry GD, Wilson SK, Delk JR 2nd, Denny GA, Young M, Cleves MA. A survey of patients with inflatable penile prostheses for satisfaction. J Urol 2005; 174: 253 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDaitch JA, Angermeier KW, Lakin MM, Ingleright BJ, Montague DK. Long‐term mechanical reliability of AMS 700 series inflatable penile prostheses: Comparison of CX/CXM and Ultrex cylinders. J Urol 1997; 158: 1400 – 2.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson SK, Cleves MA, Delk JR 2nd. Comparison of mechanical reliability of original and enhanced Mentor Alpha I penile prosthesis. J Urol 1999; 162: 715 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScott FB, Byrd GJ, Karacan I, Olsson P, Beutler LE, Attia SL. Erectile impotence treated with an implantable, inflatable prosthesis. Five years of clinical experience. JAMA 1979; 241: 2609 – 12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcVary KT. Clinical practice. Erectile dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2472 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCostabile RA. Pharmacological therapy for the treatment of sexual dysfunction–are we there yet? J Urol 2008; 179: 819 – 20.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.