Show simple item record

Complications associated with implant migration into the maxillary sinus cavity

dc.contributor.authorGalindo‐Moreno, Pabloen_US
dc.contributor.authorPadial‐Molina, Miguelen_US
dc.contributor.authorAvila, Gustavoen_US
dc.contributor.authorRios, Hector F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHernández‐cortés, Pedroen_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom‐layen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-02T17:20:21Z
dc.date.available2013-11-04T19:53:16Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationGalindo‐moreno, Pablo ; Padial‐molina, Miguel ; Avila, Gustavo; Rios, Hector F.; Hernández‐cortés, Pedro ; Wang, Hom‐lay (2012). "Complications associated with implant migration into the maxillary sinus cavity." Clinical Oral Implants Research 23(10): 1152-1160. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/93739>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-0501en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/93739
dc.description.abstractBackground Migration of dental implants into the maxillary sinus is an uncommon, but increasingly reported complication. Implant migration may result from initial lack of primary stability, intrasinusal and nasal pressure changes, autoimmune reaction to the implant or incorrect distribution of occlusal forces. This retrospective study aims at analyzing the factors that may influence implant migration into the maxillary sinus cavity. Material and methods Fourteen patients presenting a total 15 implants that migrated into the maxillary sinus were recruited. Diagnosis of this complication was based on imaging techniques, such as cone beam computerized tomography scan and panoramic radiography. Clinical data were recorded in all cases and processed for statistical analysis. Results ABH was below 6 mm in the majority of cases. However, almost 50% of the patients did not receive any site preparation treatment prior to implant insertion. Five patients (33.3%) were treated by osteotome techniques, but only one of them had bone grafting. Therefore, 73.3% of sites did not receive any biomaterial to increase available bone height. The most common complication‐associated factors found on this study were related to implant design (cylindrical), implant dimension (diameter), implant restoration/rehabilitation method (partial removable denture), site‐specific anatomy (initial residual bone height between 5 and 6.9 mm), demographics (age), and biomaterials. Conclusion Patient selection and proper treatment planning, as well as the application of the appropriate sinus augmentation technique, are critical aspects that should be controlled to minimize the risk of implant migration into the maxillary sinus cavity. [Correction added after online publication August 17 2011: The Conclusion was revised to provide better clarity to the reader.]en_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Toronto Pressen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherBone Graftingen_US
dc.subject.otherDental Implantsen_US
dc.subject.otherComplicationsen_US
dc.subject.otherAlveolar Ridge Augmentationen_US
dc.subject.otherMigrationen_US
dc.subject.otherMaxillary Sinusen_US
dc.titleComplications associated with implant migration into the maxillary sinus cavityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid22092923en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/93739/1/clr2278.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02278.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceClinical Oral Implants Researchen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRidaura‐Ruiz, L., Figueiredo, R., Guinot‐Moya, R., Pinera‐Penalva, M., Sanchez‐Garces, M.A., Valmaseda‐Castellon, E. & Gay‐Escoda, C. ( 2009 ) Accidental displacement of dental implants into the maxillary sinus: a report of nine cases. Clinical Implant Dentistry & Related Research 11 ( Suppl 1 ): e38 – e45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePjetursson, B.E., Tan, W.C., Zwahlen, M. & Lang, N.P.. ( 2008 ) A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 35: 216 – 240.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePommer, B., Unger, E., Suto, D., Hack, N. & Watzek, G. ( 2009 ) Mechanical properties of the Schneiderian membrane in vitro. Clinical Oral Implants Research 20: 633 – 637.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePommer, B. & Watzek, G. ( 2009 ) Gel‐pressure technique for flapless transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation: a preliminary cadaveric study of a new surgical technique. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 24: 817 – 822.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaghoebar, G.M. & Vissink, A. ( 2003 ) Treatment for an endosseous implant migrated into the maxillary sinus not causing maxillary sinusitis: case report. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 18: 745 – 749.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRamotar, H., Jaberoo, M.C., Koo Ng, N.K., Pulido, M.A. & Saleh, H.A. ( 2010 ) Image‐guided, endoscopic removal of migrated titanium dental implants from maxillary sinus: two cases. Journal of Laryngology & Otology 124: 433 – 436.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRegev, E., Smith, R.A., Perrott, D.H. & Pogrel, M.A. ( 1995 ) Maxillary sinus complications related to endosseous implants. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 10: 451 – 461.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRios, H.F., Avila, G., Galindo, P., Bratu, E. & Wang, H.‐L. ( 2009 ) The influence of remaining alveolar bone upon lateral window sinus augmentation implant survival. Implant Dentistry 18: 402 – 412.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScarano, A., Perrotti, V., Carinci, F. & Shibli, J.A. ( 2010 ) Removal of a migrated dental implant from the maxillary sinus after 7 years: a case report. Oral & Maxillofac Surgery, doi: 10.1007/s10006‐010‐0243‐8. Epub ahead of print.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchropp, L., Wenzel, A., Kostopoulos, L. & Karring, T. ( 2003 ) Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single‐tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12‐month prospective study. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry 23: 313 – 323.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSrouji, S., Ben‐David, D., Lotan, R., Riminucci, M., Livne, E. & Bianco, P. ( 2010 ) The innate osteogenic potential of the maxillary sinus (Schneiderian) membrane: an ectopic tissue transplant model simulating sinus lifting. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 39: 793 – 801.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSrouji, S., Kizhner, T., Ben David, D., Riminucci, M., Bianco, P. & Livne, E. ( 2009 ) The Schneiderian membrane contains osteoprogenitor cells: in vivo and in vitro study. Calcified Tissue International 84: 138 – 145.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSzmukler‐Moncler, S., Salama, H., Reingewirtz, Y. & Dubruille, J.H. ( 1998 ) Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone‐dental implant interface: review of experimental literature. Journal of Biomedical Material Research 43: 192 – 203.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTan, W.C., Lang, N.P., Zwahlen, M. & Pjetursson, B.E. ( 2008 ) A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. Part II: transalveolar technique. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 35: 241 – 254.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTestori, T., Del Fabbro, M., Capelli, M., Zuffetti, F., Francetti, L. & Weinstein, R.L. ( 2008 ) Immediate occlusal loading and tilted implants for the rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: 1‐year interim results of a multicenter prospective study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 19: 227 – 232.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThor, A., Sennerby, L., Hirsch, J.M. & Rasmusson, L. ( 2007 ) Bone formation at the maxillary sinus floor following simultaneous elevation of the mucosal lining and implant installation without graft material: an evaluation of 20 patients treated with 44 Astra Tech implants. Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 65: 64 – 72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceToffler, M. ( 2004 ) Osteotome‐mediated sinus floor elevation: a clinical report. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 19: 266 – 273.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrisi, P. & Rao, W. ( 1999 ) Bone classification: clinical‐histomorphometric comparison. Clinical Oral Implants Research 10: 1 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTsodoulos, S., Karabouta‐Voulgaropoulou, I., Voulgaropoulou, M. & Georgiou, C. ( 2010 ) Atraumatic removal of an asymptomatic migrated dental implant into the maxillary sinus: a case report. Journal of Oral Implantology, doi: 10.1563/AAID‐JOI‐D‐10‐00053. Epub ahead of print.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUlm, C., Kneissel, M., Schedle, A., Solar, P., Matejka, M., Schneider, B. & Donath, K. ( 1999 ) Characteristic features of trabecular bone in edentulous maxillae. Clinical Oral Implants Research 10: 459 – 467.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVarol, A., Turker, N., Goker, K. & Basa, S. ( 2006 ) Endoscopic retrieval of dental implants from the maxillary sinus. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 21: 801 – 804.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVitkov, L., Gellrich, N.C. & Hannig, M. ( 2005 ) Sinus floor elevation via hydraulic detachment and elevation of the Schneiderian membrane. Clinical Oral Implants Research 16: 615 – 621.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWallace, S.S. & Froum, S.J. ( 2003 ) Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Annals of Periodontology 8: 328 – 343.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang, H.L. & Katranji, A. ( 2008 ) ABC sinus augmentation classification. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry 28: 383 – 389.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWheeler, S. & Bollinger, C.M. ( 2009 ) Complication or substandard care? Risks of inadequate implant training Journal of the California Dental Association 37: 647 – 651.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhitehouse, J. ( 2008 ) Technology helps an “amateur” place implants. Dentistry Today 27: 120, 122, 124.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZinner, I.D. & Small, S.A.. ( 1996 ) Sinus‐lift graft: using the maxillary sinuses to support implants. Journal of the American Dental Association 127: 51 – 57.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdell, R., Lekholm, U., Grondahl, K., Branemark, P.I., Lindstrom, J. & Jacobsson, M. ( 1990 ) Reconstruction of severely resorbed edentulous maxillae using osseointegrated fixtures in immediate autogenous bone grafts. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 5: 233 – 246.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAkagawa, Y., Hashimoto, M., Kondo, N., Satomi, K., Takata, T. & Tsuru, H. ( 1986 ) Initial bone‐implant interfaces of submergible and supramergible endosseous single‐crystal sapphire implants. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 55: 96 – 100.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBalshi, T.J., Wolfinger, G.J. & Balshi, S.F. 2nd ( 1999 ) Analysis of 356 pterygomaxillary implants in edentulous arches for fixed prosthesis anchorage. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 14: 398 – 406.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerengo, M., Sivolella, S., Majzoub, Z. & Cordioli, G. ( 2004 ) Endoscopic evaluation of the bone‐added osteotome sinus floor elevation procedure. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 33: 189 – 194.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBorgonovo, A., Fabbri, A., Boninsegna, R., Dolci, M. & Censi, R. ( 2010 ) Displacement of a dental implant into the maxillary sinus: case series. Minerva Stomatologica 59: 45 – 54.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyne, P.J. ( 1993 ) Analysis of performance of root‐form endosseous implants placed in the maxillary sinus. Journal of Long‐Term Effects of Medical Implants 3: 143 – 159.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyne, P.J. & James, R.A. ( 1980 ) Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. Journal of Oral Surgery 38: 613 – 616.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrunski, J.B. ( 1999 ) In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental‐implant interface. Advances in Dental Research 13: 99 – 119.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChiapasco, M., Felisati, G., Maccari, A., Borloni, R., Gatti, F. & Di Leo, F. ( 2009 ) The management of complications following displacement of oral implants in the paranasal sinuses: a multicenter clinical report and proposed treatment protocols. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 38: 1273 – 1278.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChiapasco, M., Zaniboni, M. & Boisco, M. ( 2006 ) Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 17 ( Suppl 2 ): 136 – 159.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCho, S.C., Wallace, S.S., Froum, S.J. & Tarnow, D.P. ( 2001 ) Influence of anatomy on Schneiderian membrane perforations during sinus elevation surgery: three‐dimensional analysis. Practical Procedures & Aesthetic Dentistry 13: 160 – 163.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavies, J.E. ( 1998 ) Mechanisms of endosseous integration. International Journal of Prosthodontics 11: 391 – 401.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEngelke, W. & Deckwer, I. ( 1997 ) Endoscopically controlled sinus floor augmentation. A preliminary report. Clinical Oral Implants Research 8: 527 – 531.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEngelke, W., Schwarzwaller, W., Behnsen, A. & Jacobs, H.G. ( 2003 ) Subantroscopic laterobasal sinus floor augmentation (SALSA): an up‐to‐5‐year clinical study. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 18: 135 – 143.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerrigno, N., Laureti, M. & Fanali, S. ( 2006 ) Dental implants placement in conjunction with osteotome sinus floor elevation: a 12‐year life‐table analysis from a prospective study on 588 ITI implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 17: 194 – 205.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFlanagan, D. ( 2009 ) A method to retrieve a displaced dental implant from the maxillary sinus. Journal of Oral Implantology 35: 70 – 74.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalindo, P., Sanchez‐Fernandez, E., Avila, G., Cutando, A. & Fernandez, J.E. ( 2005 ) Migration of implants into the maxillary sinus: two clinical cases. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 20: 291 – 295.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalindo‐Moreno, P., Avila, G., Fernandez‐Barbero, J.E., Aguilar, M., Sanchez‐Fernandez, E., Cutando, A. & Wang, H.L. ( 2007 ) Evaluation of sinus floor elevation using a composite bone graft mixture. Clinical Oral Implants Research 18: 376 – 382.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalindo‐Moreno, P., Avila, G., Fernandez‐Barbero, J.E., Mesa, F., O'Valle‐Ravassa, F. & Wang, H.L. ( 2008 ) Clinical and histologic comparison of two different composite grafts for sinus augmentation: a pilot clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research 19: 755 – 759.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalindo‐Moreno, P., Moreno‐Riestra, I., Avila, G., Fernandez‐Barbero, J.E., Mesa, F., Aguilar, M., Wang, H.L. & O'Valle, F. ( 2010 ) Histomorphometric comparison of maxillary pristine bone and composite bone graft biopsies obtained after sinus augmentation. Clinical Oral Implants Research 21: 122 – 128.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuler, N. & Delilbasi, C. ( 2007 ) Ectopic dental implants in the maxillary sinus. Quintessence International 38: e238 – e239.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHandschel, J., Simonowska, M., Naujoks, C., Depprich, R.A., Ommerborn, M.A., Meyer, U. & Kubler, N.R. ( 2009 ) A histomorphometric meta‐analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials. Head & Face Medicine 5: 12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHernandez‐Alfaro, F., Torradeflot, M.M. & Marti, C. ( 2008 ) Prevalence and management of Schneiderian membrane perforations during sinus‐lift procedures. Clinical Oral Implants Research 19: 91 – 98.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIida, S., Tanaka, N., Kogo, M. & Matsuya, T. ( 2000 ) Migration of a dental implant into the maxillary sinus. A case report. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 29: 358 – 359.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatranji, A., Fotek, P. & Wang, H.L. ( 2008 ) Sinus augmentation complications: etiology and treatment. Implant Dentistry 17: 339 – 349.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim, J.W., Lee, C.H., Kwon, T.K. & Kim, D.K. ( 2007 ) Endoscopic removal of a dental implant through a middle meatal antrostomy. British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 45: 408 – 409.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKitamura, A. ( 2007 ) Removal of a migrated dental implant from a maxillary sinus by transnasal endoscopy. British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 45: 410 – 411.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKitamura, A. & Zeredo, J.L.. ( 2010 ) Migrated maxillary implant removed via semilunar hiatus by transnasal endoscope. Implant Dentistry 19: 16 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKluppel, L.E., Santos, S.E., Olate, S., Freire Filho, F.W., Moreira, R.W. & de Moraes, M. ( 2010 ) Implant migration into maxillary sinus: description of two asymptomatic cases. Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 14: 63 – 66.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLubbe, D.E., Aniruth, S., Peck, T. & Liebenberg, S. ( 2008 ) Endoscopic transnasal removal of migrated dental implants. British Dental Journal 204: 435 – 436.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLundgren, S., Andersson, S., Gualini, F. & Sennerby, L. ( 2004 ) Bone reformation with sinus membrane elevation: a new surgical technique for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Clinical Implant Dentistry & Related Research 6: 165 – 173.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMalevez, C., Abarca, M., Durdu, F. & Daelemans, P. ( 2004 ) Clinical outcome of 103 consecutive zygomatic implants: a 6–48 months follow‐up study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 15: 18 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMisch, C.E. ( 1990a ) Divisions of available bone in implant dentistry. International Journal of Oral Implantology 7: 9 – 17.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMisch, C.E. ( 1990b ) Classifications and treatment options of the completely edentulous arch in implant dentistry. Dentistry Today 9: 26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNakamura, N., Mitsuyasu, T. & Ohishi, M. ( 2004 ) Endoscopic removal of a dental implant displaced into the maxillary sinus: technical note. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 33: 195 – 197.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNedir, R., Bischof, M., Vazquez, L., Szmukler‐Moncler, S. & Bernard, J.P. ( 2006 ) Osteotome sinus floor elevation without grafting material: a 1‐year prospective pilot study with ITI implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 17: 679 – 686.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNkenke, E., Schlegel, A., Schultze‐Mosgau, S., Neukam, F.W. & Wiltfang, J. ( 2002 ) The endoscopically controlled osteotome sinus floor elevation: a preliminary prospective study. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 17: 557 – 566.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOgunsalu, C., Judy, K., Obiechina, A., Daisely, H., Bissoon, A.K., Steigmann, M., Dosumu, O., Okojie, V. & Akeredolu, P. ( 2009 ) Systematic approach for the propagation of postgraduate dental implant education in developing countries. Implant Dentistry 18: 249 – 259.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlson, J.W., Dent, C.D., Morris, H.F. & Ochi, S. ( 2000 ) Long‐term assessment (5–71 months) of endosseous dental implants placed in the augmented maxillary sinus. Annals of Periodontology 5: 152 – 156.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeleg, M., Mazor, Z. & Garg, A.K. ( 1999 ) Augmentation grafting of the maxillary sinus and simultaneous implant placement in patients with 3–5 mm of residual alveolar bone height. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 14: 549 – 556.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePenarrocha, M., Carrillo, C. & Boronat, A. ( 2009 ) Retrospective study of 68 implants placed in the pterygomaxillary region using drills and osteotomes. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 24: 720 – 726.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePikos, M.A. ( 1999 ) Maxillary sinus membrane repair: report of a technique for large perforations. Implant Dentistry 8: 29 – 34.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePikos, M.A. ( 2009 ) Unhealthy competition. Implant Dentistry 18: 193.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePilliar, R.M. ( 1991 ) Quantitative evaluation of the effect of movement at a porous coated implant – bone interface. In: Davies, J.E. ed. The Bone‐Biomaterial Interface, 380 – 387. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePjetursson, B.E., Rast, C., Bragger, U., Schmidlin, K., Zwahlen, M. & Lang, N.P.. ( 2009 ) Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: implant survival and patients’ perception. Clinical Oral Implants Research 20: 667 – 676.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.