View Item 

Show simple item record

Direct Quantitative Comparison of Molecular Responses in Photodamaged Human Skin to Fractionated and Fully Ablative Carbon Dioxide Laser Resurfacing

dc.contributor.authorOrringer, Jeffrey S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSachs, Dana L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorShao, Yuanen_US
dc.contributor.authorHammerberg, Craigen_US
dc.contributor.authorCui, Yileien_US
dc.contributor.authorVoorhees, John J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFisher, Gary J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-07T17:04:41Z
dc.date.available2013-11-15T16:44:23Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationOrringer, Jeffrey S.; Sachs, Dana L.; Shao, Yuan; Hammerberg, Craig; Cui, Yilei; Voorhees, John J.; Fisher, Gary J. (2012). "Direct Quantitative Comparison of Molecular Responses in Photodamaged Human Skin to Fractionated and Fully Ablative Carbon Dioxide Laser Resurfacing." Dermatologic Surgery 38(10): 1668-1677. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/94282>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1076-0512en_US
dc.identifier.issn1524-4725en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/94282
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.titleDirect Quantitative Comparison of Molecular Responses in Photodamaged Human Skin to Fractionated and Fully Ablative Carbon Dioxide Laser Resurfacingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDermatologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid22805255en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/94282/1/dsu2518.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02518.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceDermatologic Surgeryen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQuan T, Qin Z, Xia W, Shao Y, et al. Matrix‐degrading metalloproteinases in photoaging. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc 2009; 14: 20 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarimipour DJ, Kang S, Johnson TM, Orringer JS, et al. Microdermabrasion: a molecular analysis following a single treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005; 52: 215 – 23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarimipour DJ, Kang S, Johnson TM, Orringer JS, et al. Microdermabrasion with and without aluminum oxide crystal abrasion: a comparative molecular analysis of dermal remodeling. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 54: 405 – 10.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarimipour DJ, Rittie L, Hammerberg C, Min VK, et al. Molecular analysis of aggressive microdermabrasion in photoaged skin. Arch Dermatol 2009; 145: 1114 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrringer J, Voorhees J, Hamilton T, Hammerberg C, et al. Dermal matrix remodeling after nonablative laser therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005; 53: 775 – 82.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrringer JS, Hammerberg C, Hamilton T, Johnson TM, et al. Molecular effects of photodynamic therapy for photoaging. Arch Dermatol 2008; 144: 1296 – 302.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrringer JS, Kang S, Johnson TM, Karimipour DJ, et al. Connective tissue remodeling induced by carbon dioxide laser resurfacing of photodamaged human skin. Arch Dermatol 2004; 140: 1326 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSachs D, Kang S, Hammerberg C, Helfrich Y, et al. Topical 5‐fluorouracil improves actinic keratoses and photoaging: a clinical and molecular analysis. Arch Dermatol 2009; 145: 659 – 66.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang F, Garza LA, Kang S, Varani J, et al. In vivo stimulation of de novo collagen production caused by cross‐linked hyaluronic acid dermal filler injections in photodamaged human skin. Arch Dermatol 2007; 143: 155 – 63.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrringer JS, Rittie L, Baker D, Voorhees JJ, et al. Molecular mechanisms of nonablative fractionated laser resurfacing. Br J Dermatol 2010; 163: 757 – 68.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrringer JS, Rittie L, Hamilton T, Karimipour DJ, et al. Intraepidermal erbium:YAG laser resurfacing: impact on the dermal matrix. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 64: 119 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRittié L, Kang S, Voorhees JJ, Fisher GJ. Induction of collagen by estradiol: difference between sun‐protected and photodamaged human skin in vivo. Arch Dermatol 2008; 144: 1129 – 40.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSinger AJ, Clark RA. Cutaneous wound healing. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 738 – 46.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMahdavian Delavary B, van der Veer WM, van Egmond M, Niessen FB, et al. Macrophages in skin injury and repair. Immunobiology 2011; 216: 753 – 62.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCervelli V, Gentile P, Spallone D, Nicoli F, et al. Ultrapulsed fractional CO 2 laser for the treatment of post‐traumatic and pathological scars. J Drugs Dermatol 2010; 9: 1328 – 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTierney EP, Hanke CW, Petersen J, Bartley T, et al. Clinical and echographic analysis of ablative fractionated carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of photodamaged facial skin. Dermatol Surg 2010; 36: 2009 – 21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeiss ET, Chapas A, Brightman L, Hunzeker C, et al. Successful treatment of atrophic postoperative and traumatic scarring with carbon dioxide ablative fractional resurfacing: quantitative volumetric scar improvement. Arch Dermatol 2010; 146: 133 – 40.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrignano F, Campolmi P, Bonan P, Ricceri F, et al. Fractional CO 2 laser: a novel therapeutic device upon photobiomodulation of tissue remodeling and cytokine pathway of tissue repair. Dermatol Ther 2009; Nov ( 22 Suppl 1 ): S8 – 15.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHelbig D, Bodendorf MO, Grunewald S, Kendler M, et al. Immunohistochemical investigation of wound healing in response to fractional photothermolysis. J Biomed Opt 2009; 14: 064044.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRatner D, Tse Y, Marchell N, Goldman MP, et al. Cutaneous laser resurfacing. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 1 ( 3 Pt 1 ): 365 – 89.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNanni C, Alster T. Complications of carbon dioxide laser resurfacing—An evaluation of 500 patients. Dermatol Surg 1998; 24: 315 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceManstein D, Herron GS, Sink RK, Tanner H, et al. Fractional photothermolysis: a new concept for cutaneous remodeling using microscopic patterns of thermal injury. Lasers Surg Med 2004; 34: 426 – 38.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCiocon DH, Engelman DE, Hussain M, Goldberg DJ. A split‐face comparison of two ablative fractional carbon dioxide lasers for the treatment of photodamaged facial skin. Dermatol Surg 2011; 37: 784 – 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen SR, Henssler C, Johnston J. Fractional photothermolysis for skin rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124: 281 – 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLapidoth M, Yagima Odo ME, Odo LM. Novel use of erbium:YAG (2,940‐nm) laser for fractional ablative photothermolysis in the treatment of photodamaged facial skin: a pilot study. Dermatol Surg 2008; 34: 1048 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChapas AM, Brightman L, Sukal S, Hale E, et al. Successful treatment of acneiform scarring with CO 2 ablative fractional resurfacing. Lasers Surg Med 2008; 40: 381 – 6.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
dsu2518.pdf
Size:
465.3KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.