Show simple item record

Clinical yield of diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in orthotopic liver transplant recipients With suspected biliary complications

dc.contributor.authorElmunzer, B. Josephen_US
dc.contributor.authorDeBenedet, Anthony T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVolk, Michael L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSonnenday, Christopher J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWaljee, Akbar K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFontana, Robert J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOza, Aarti B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSingal, Amiten_US
dc.contributor.authorEnglesbe, Michael J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorScheiman, James M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-03T19:41:25Z
dc.date.available2014-01-07T14:51:08Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationElmunzer, B. Joseph; DeBenedet, Anthony T.; Volk, Michael L.; Sonnenday, Christopher J.; Waljee, Akbar K.; Fontana, Robert J.; Oza, Aarti B.; Singal, Amit; Englesbe, Michael J.; Scheiman, James M. (2012). "Clinical yield of diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in orthotopic liver transplant recipients With suspected biliary complications ." Liver Transplantation 18(12): 1479-1484. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/95170>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1527-6465en_US
dc.identifier.issn1527-6473en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/95170
dc.description.abstractDiagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (D‐ERCP) is commonly performed for the evaluation of biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). This practice is contrary to the national trend of reserving endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for therapeutic purposes. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical yield and complications of D‐ERCP in OLT recipients. In this retrospective study, 165 OLT recipients who underwent ERCP between January 2006 and December 2010 at the University of Michigan were divided into 2 groups: (1) a therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (T‐ERCP) group (if they met prespecified criteria that suggested a high likelihood of endoscopic intervention) and (2) a D‐ERCP group (if there was clinical suspicion of biliary disease but they did not meet any criteria). The 2 groups were compared with respect to the proportion of subjects undergoing high‐yield ERCP, which was defined as a procedure resulting in a clinically important intervention that modified the disease course. 66.3% of the D‐ERCP procedures were classified as high‐yield, whereas 90.1% of the T‐ERCP procedures were ( P < 0.001). Serious complications were infrequent in both groups. A survey of practitioners caring for OLT recipients suggested that the rate of high‐yield D‐ERCP seen in this study is congruent with what is considered acceptable in clinical practice. In conclusion, although T‐ERCP is more likely to reveal a pathological process requiring an intervention, D‐ERCP appears to be an acceptable clinical strategy for OLT recipients because of the high likelihood of a high‐yield study and the low rate of serious complications. Liver Transpl, 2012. © 2012 AASLD.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.titleClinical yield of diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in orthotopic liver transplant recipients With suspected biliary complicationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSurgery and Anesthesiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan Medical Center, 3912 Taubman Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TXen_US
dc.identifier.pmid22888069en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/95170/1/23535_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/lt.23535en_US
dc.identifier.sourceLiver Transplantationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHawes RH. The evolution of endoscopic ultrasound: improved imaging, higher accuracy for fine needle aspiration and the reality of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided interventions. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2010; 26: 436 ‐ 444.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoté GA, Sherman S. Advances in pancreatobiliary endoscopy. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2010; 26: 429 ‐ 435.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanna C, Giordanino C, Giono I, Barletti C, Ferrari A, Recchia S, et al. Safety and efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with post‐liver transplant biliary complications: results of a cohort study with long‐term follow‐up. Gut Liver 2011; 5: 328 ‐ 334.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMallery JS, Baron TH, Dominitz JA, Goldstein JL, Hirota WK, Jacobson BC, et al.; for Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Complications of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 633 ‐ 638.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RC, Meyers WC, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 383 ‐ 393.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanna C, Saracco GM, Reggio D, Moro F, Ricchiuti A, Strignano P, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation: outcomes and complications. Transplant Proc 2009; 41: 1319 ‐ 1321.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJorgensen JE, Waljee AK, Volk ML, Sonnenday CJ, Elta GH, Al‐Hawary MM, et al. Is MRCP equivalent to ERCP for diagnosing biliary obstruction in orthotopic liver transplant recipients? A meta‐analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 955 ‐ 962.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWelling TH, Heidt DG, Englesbe MJ, Magee JC, Sung RS, Campbell DA, et al. Biliary complications following liver transplantation in the Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease era: effect of donor, recipient, and technical factors. Liver Transpl 2008; 14: 73 ‐ 80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBalderramo D, Bordas JM, Sendino O, Abraldes JG, Navasa M, Llach J, Cardenas A. Complications after ERCP in liver transplant recipients. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 285 ‐ 294.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePark JS, Kim MH, Lee SK, Seo DW, Lee SS, Han J, et al. Efficacy of endoscopic and percutaneous treatments for biliary complications after cadaveric and living donor liver transplantation. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 78 ‐ 85.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRerknimitr R, Sherman S, Fogel EL, Kalayci C, Lumeng L, Chalasani N, et al. Biliary tract complications after orthotopic liver transplantation with choledochocholedochostomy anastomosis: endoscopic findings and results of therapy. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 224 ‐ 231.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNIH state‐of‐the‐science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy. NIH Consens State Sci Statements 2002; 19: 1 ‐ 26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Maple JT, Ben‐Menachem T, Anderson MA, Appalaneni V, Banerjee S, et al. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 1 ‐ 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMazen Jamal M, Yoon EJ, Saadi A, Sy TY, Hashemzadeh M. Trends in the utilization of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 966 ‐ 975.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRomagnuolo J, Bardou M, Rahme E, Joseph L, Reinhold C, Barkun AN. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a meta‐analysis of test performance in suspected biliary disease. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139: 547 ‐ 557.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePetrov MS, Savides TJ. Systematic review of endoscopic ultrasonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for suspected choledocholithiasis. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 967 ‐ 974.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.