View Item 

Show simple item record

Overcoming Barriers to Addressing Education Problems With Research Design: A Panel Discussion

dc.contributor.authorYarris, Lalena M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGruppen, Larry D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHamstra, Stanley J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAnders Ericsson, K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCook, David A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKowalenko, Terryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-03T19:44:09Z
dc.date.available2014-01-07T14:51:09Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationYarris, Lalena M.; Gruppen, Larry D.; Hamstra, Stanley J.; Anders Ericsson, K.; Cook, David A.; Kowalenko, Terry (2012). "Overcoming Barriers to Addressing Education Problems With Research Design: A Panel Discussion." Academic Emergency Medicine 19(12): 1344-1349. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/95428>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1069-6563en_US
dc.identifier.issn1553-2712en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/95428
dc.description.abstractA plenary panel session at the 2012 Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference “Education Research in Emergency Medicine: Opportunities, Challenges, and Strategies for Success” discussed barriers educators face in imagining, designing, and implementing studies to address educational challenges. This proceedings article presents a general approach to getting started in education research. Four examples of studies from the medical education literature that illustrate a distinct way to approach specific research questions are discussed. The study designs used are applicable to a variety of education research problems in emergency medicine ( EM ). Potential applications of studies are discussed, as well as effects and lessons learned.en_US
dc.publisherJohnWiley & Sons, Inc.en_US
dc.titleOvercoming Barriers to Addressing Education Problems With Research Design: A Panel Discussionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid23252365en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/95428/1/acem12025.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/acem.12025en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAcademic Emergency Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMatsumoto ED, Pace KT, Honey R, John D. Virtual reality ureteroscopy simulator as a valid tool for assessing endourological skills. Int J Urol. 2006; 13: 896 – 901.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEva KW. On the limits of systematicity. Med Educ. 2008; 42: 852 – 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlassick CE, Huber MT, Maeroff G. Scholarship Assessed: Evaluation of the Professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey‐Bass, 1997.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook DA. If you teach them, they will learn: why medical education needs comparative effectiveness research. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012; 17: 305 – 10.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoberts LW, Geppert C, Connor R, Nguyen K, Warner TD. An invitation for medical educators to focus on ethical and policy issues in research and scholarly practice. Acad Med. 2001; 76: 876 – 85.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook DA. Twelve tips for evaluating educational programs. Med Teach. 2010; 32: 296 – 301.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook DA. Getting started in medical education scholarship. Keio J Med. 2010; 59: 96 – 103.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMatsumoto ED, Hamstra SJ, Radomski SB, Cusimano MD. The effect of bench model fidelity on endourologic skills: a randomized controlled study. J Urol. 2002; 167: 1243 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrober ED, Hamstra SH, Wanzel KR, et al. Laboratory based training in urological microsurgery with bench model simulators: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the durability of technical skill. J Urol. 2004; 172: 378 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSamuelson ML, Cadeddu JA, Matsumoto ED. Laparoscopic decision making: impact of preoperative reading and laparoscopic experience. J Urol. 2006; 176: 1553 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSabbagh RA, Chatterjee SB, Chawla AB, Hoogenes JC, Kapoor AB, Matsumoto ED. Transfer of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy skills from bench model to animal model: a prospective, single‐blind, randomized, controlled study. J Urol. 2012; 187: 1861 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHauge LS, Frischknecht AC, Boehler M, et al. Simulating management of patient care: how prepared are your interns to take call? Presentation: Surgical Education Week (ASE/APDS). Boston, MA, March, 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePusic M, Pecaric M, Boutis K. How much practice is enough? Using learning curves to assess the deliberate practice of radiograph interpretation. Using learning curves to assess the deliberate practice of radiograph interpretation. Acad Med. 2011; 86: 731 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEricsson KA. The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In: Ericsson KA, Charness N, Feltovich P, Hoffman RR (eds). Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp 685 – 706.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEricsson KA. Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview. Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 15: 988 – 94.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThurstone LL. The learning curve equation. Psychological Monog. 1919; 26: 1 – 51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMa IW, Brindle ME, Ronksley PE, Lorenzetti DL, Sauve RS, Ghali WA. Use of simulation‐based education to improve outcomes of central venous catheterization: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Acad Med. 2011; 86: 1137 – 47.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDong Y, Suri HS, Cook DA, et al. Simulation‐based objective assessment discerns clinical proficiency in central line placement: a construct validation. Chest. 2010; 137: 1050 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDowning SM. Validity: on the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ. 2003; 37: 830 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarrell SE, Coates WC, Kuhn GJ, Fisher J, Shayne P, Lin M. Highlights in emergency medicine medical education research: 2008. Acad Emerg Med. 2009; 16: 1318 – 24.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKuhn GJ, Shayne P, Coates WC, Fisher J, Lin M, Maggio LA, Farrell SE. Critical appraisal of emergency medicine educational research: the best publications of 2009. Acad Emerg Med. 2010; 17 ( Suppl 2 ): S16 – 25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShayne P, Coates WC, Farrell SE, et al. Critical appraisal of emergency medicine educational research: the best publications of 2010. Acad Emerg Med. 2011; 18: 1081 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Papp KK, During SF. Clinician educators' experiences with institutional review boards: results of a national survey. Acad Med. 2008; 83: 590 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWolf FM. Methodological quality, evidence, and research in medical education (RIME). Acad Med. 2004; 79 ( Suppl 10 ): 68 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook DA, Beckman TJ, Bordage G. Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2007; 41: 737 – 45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Internet‐based learning in the health professions: a meta‐analysis. JAMA. 2008; 300: 1181 – 96.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReed DA, Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Levine RB, Kern DE, Wright SM. Association between funding and quality of published medical education research. JAMA. 2007; 298: 1002 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaernstein A, Liss HK, Carney PA, Elmore JG. Trends in study methods used in undergraduate medical education research, 1969–2007. JAMA. 2007; 298: 1038 – 45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S. Method and reporting quality in health professions education research: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2011; 45: 227 – 38.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeckman TJ, Cook DA. Developing scholarly projects in education: a primer for medical teachers. Med Teach. 2007; 29: 210 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBordage G. Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify. Med Educ. 2009; 43: 312 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGiacomini M. Theory‐based medicine and the role of evidence: why the emperor needs new clothes, again. Perspect Biol Med. 2009; 52: 234 – 51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook DA, Bordage G, Schmidt HG. Description, justification, and clarification: a framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education. Med Educ. 2008; 42: 128 – 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Pawson R. Realist methods in medical education research: what are they and what can they contribute? Med Educ. 2012; 46: 89 – 96.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook DA, Beckman TJ. Reflections on experimental research in medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010; 15: 455 – 64.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook DA, Beckman TJ. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. Am J Med. 2006; 119: 166e7 – 16.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDillman D. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 2nd ed. New York, NY: JohnWiley & Sons, Inc., 2000.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook DA, West CP. Conducting systematic reviews in medical education: a stepwise approach. Med Educ. 2012; 46: 943 – 52.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
acem12025.pdf
Size:
522.5KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.