View Item 

Show simple item record

Temporal Decreases in Sperm Motility: Which Patients Should Have Motility Checked at Both 1 and 2 Hours After Collection?

dc.contributor.authorSchulte, Ryan T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKeller, Laura M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHiner, Melissa R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOhl, Dana A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Gary D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-12T19:00:18Z
dc.date.available2013-02-12T19:00:18Z
dc.date.issued2008-09-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationSchulte, Ryan T.; Keller, Laura M.; Hiner, Melissa R.; Ohl, Dana A.; Smith, Gary D. (2008). "Temporal Decreases in Sperm Motility: Which Patients Should Have Motility Checked at Both 1 and 2 Hours After Collection?." Journal of Andrology 29(5). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96241>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0196-3635en_US
dc.identifier.issn1939-4640en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96241
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherAssisted Reproductionen_US
dc.subject.otherSemenen_US
dc.subject.otherSemen Analysisen_US
dc.subject.otherInfertilityen_US
dc.titleTemporal Decreases in Sperm Motility: Which Patients Should Have Motility Checked at Both 1 and 2 Hours After Collection?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelUrologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Integrated and Molecular Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumReproductive Sciences Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/96241/1/jandrol.107.004002.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.2164/jandrol.107.004002en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Andrologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRuiz‐Pesini E., Diez C., Lapena AC, Perez‐Martos A., Montoya J., Alvarez E., Arenas J., Lopez‐Perez MJ. Correlation of sperm motility with mitochondrial enzymatic activities. Clin Chem. 1998; 44: 1616 – 1620.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBongso TA, Ng SC, Mok H., Lim MN, Teo HL, Wong PC, Ratnam SS. Effect of sperm motility on human in vitro fertilization. Arch Androl. 1989; 22: 185 – 190.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohlen BJ, te Velde ER, van Kooij RJ, Looman CW, Habbema JD. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treating male subfertility: a controlled study. Hum Reprod. 1998; 13: 1553 – 1558.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDenil J., Ohl DA, Hurd WW, Menge AC, Hiner MR. Motility longevity of sperm samples processed for intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 1992; 58: 436 – 438.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDickey RP, Pyrzak R., Lu PY, Taylor SN, Rye PH. Comparison of the sperm quality necessary for successful intrauterine insemination with World Health Organization threshold values for normal sperm. Fertil Steril. 1999; 71: 684 – 689.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDonnelly ET, Lewis SE, McNally JA, Thompson W.. In vitro fertilization and pregnancy rates: the influence of sperm motility and morphology on IVF outcome. Fertil Steril. 1998; 70: 305 – 314.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlover T., Barrat C., Tyler J., Hennessey J.. Human Male Fertility and Semen Analysis. London: Academic Press Limited, 1990.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKruger TF, Menkveld R., Stander FS, Lombard CJ, van Der Merwe JP, van Zyl JA, Smith K.. Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1986; 46: 1118 – 1123.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee VM, Wong JS, Loh SK, Leong NK. Sperm motility in the semen analysis affects the outcome of superovulation intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertile Asian couples with male factor infertility. Bjog. 2002; 109: 115 – 120.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMakler A., Zaidise I., Paldi E., Brandes JM. Factors affecting sperm motility. I. In vitro change in motility with time after ejaculation. Fertil Steril. 1979; 31: 147 – 154.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller DC, Hollenbeck BK, Smith GD, Randolph JF, Christman GM, Smith YR, Lebovic DI, Ohl DA. Processed total motile sperm count correlates with pregnancy outcome after intrauterine insemination. Urology. 2002; 60: 497 – 501.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMosher WD, Pratt WF. Fecundity and infertility in the United States: incidence and trends. Fertil Steril. 1991; 56: 192 – 193.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMundy AJ, Ryder TA, Edmonds DK. Asthenozoospermia and the human sperm mid‐piece. Hum Reprod. 1995; 10: 116 – 119.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNakada K., Sato A., Yoshida K., Morita T., Tanaka H., Inoue S., Yonekawa H., Hayashi J.. Mitochondria‐related male infertility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103: 15148 – 15153.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePasqualotto EB, Daitch JA, Hendin BN, Falcone T., Thomas AJ Jr, Nelson DR, Agarwal A.. Relationship of total motile sperm count and percentage motile sperm to successful pregnancy rates following intrauterine insemination. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1999; 16: 476 – 482.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePiasecka M., Kawiak J.. Sperm mitochondria of patients with normal sperm motility and with asthenozoospermia: morphological and functional study. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2003; 41: 125 – 139.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRepping S., van Weert JM, Mol BW, de Vries JW, van Der Veen F.. Use of the total motile sperm count to predict total fertilization failure in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2002; 78: 22 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShulman A., Hauser R., Lipitz S., Frenkel Y., Dor J., Bider D., Mashiach S., Yogev L., Yavetz H.. Sperm motility is a major determinant of pregnancy outcome following intrauterine insemination. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998; 15: 381 – 385.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSinger R., Sagiv M., Landau B., Allalouf D., Segenreich E., Servadio C.. Motility and vitality of human spermatozoa at various time intervals after ejaculation. Experientia. 1980; 36: 578 – 579.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStalf T., Mehnert C., Hajimohammad A., Manolopoulos K., Shen Y., Schuppe HC, Diemer T., Schill WB, Weidner W., Tinneberg HR. Influence of motility and vitality in intracytoplasmic sperm injection with ejaculated and testicular sperm. Andrologia. 2005; 37: 125 – 130.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThonneau P., Marchand S., Tallec A., Ferial ML, Ducot B., Lansac J., Lopes P., Tabaste JM, Spira A.. Incidence and main causes of infertility in a resident population (1,850,000) of three French regions (1988–1989). Hum Reprod. 1991; 6: 811 – 816.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Voorhis BJ, Barnett M., Sparks AE, Syrop CH, Rosenthal G., Dawson J.. Effect of the total motile sperm count on the efficacy and cost‐effectiveness of intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2001; 75: 661 – 668.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrganization World Health. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm‐Cervical Mucus Interaction. 4th ed. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 1999.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYalti S., Gurbuz B., Sezer H., Celik S.. Effects of semen characteristics on IUI combined with mild ovarian stimulation. Arch Androl. 2004; 50: 239 – 246.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhao Y., Vlahos N., Wyncott D., Petrella C., Garcia J., Zacur H., Wallach EE. Impact of semen characteristics on the success of intrauterine insemination. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2004; 21: 143 – 148.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jandrol.107.004002.pdf
Size:
383.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.