Show simple item record

Medical Students' Problem-Solving Skills Predict How They Experience Medical School

dc.contributor.authorStansfield, R. Brent
dc.contributor.authorEngelmann, Susanne
dc.contributor.authorGruppen, Larry D.
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-20T19:38:26Z
dc.date.available2013-03-20T19:38:26Z
dc.date.issued2013-03-20
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/97017
dc.description.abstractOb jective The learning environment impacts medical students’ motivation, attitudes, academic performance, and professionalism. Aspects of the learning environment— faculty and administrative treatment of students, student social experiences, consequences for intellectual honesty and ethical integrety—constitute a “hid- den curriculum” which every medical school must strive to improve. As part of the American Medical Association’s Innovative Strategies for Transforming the Education of Physicians (ISTEP) initiative, the Learning Environment Study (LES), we sought psychological predictors of student subjective experience of the learning environment. We predicted that a measure of students’ tendency to react to difficult situations immediately upon matriculation would predict how they rated various aspects of their medical school experience at the end of their second year. Methods 155 undergraduate medical students from the classes of 2014 and 2015 com- pleted a subset of the Ways of Coping Scale (WCS: 22 items comprising 8 validated subscores, Folkman & Lazarus, 1986) at the time of matriculation and the Medical Student Learning Environment Scale (MSLES: 17 items an- alyzed individually, Rosenbaum, et al, 2007) at the end of their second year. We performed multiple regression Ratings on each MSLES item by the 8 WCS subscores. Results Social aspects of medical school were rated more positively by students with higher Planful Problem-Solving and Positive Reappraisal scores: these students make conscious efforts to actively, productively address their difficult situations. In contrast, students with high Escape Avoidance scores gave lower ratings for “Students gather together for informal activities.” Students who were more emotionally controlled (high Self-Controlling scores) found the school administration less likely to take meaningful action to support students and that students were reluctant to share their troubles with each other. Student who tend to seek Social Support when dealing with problems had difficulties finding time for interests outside of medicine and reported intense competition for grades. Conclusions Students’ experience of medical school is to some extent a function of their general approach to problem-solving. To improve the learning environment, schools should be sensitive to students’ differences in this regard. Encouraging students to use planful problem-solving and positive reappraisal may have pos- itive benefits. This analysis represents one only school and an analysis of the larger multi-institutional ISTEP LES dataset may challenge the consistency of these results across schools.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectMedical Education, Learning Environment, Ways of Copingen_US
dc.titleMedical Students' Problem-Solving Skills Predict How They Experience Medical Schoolen_US
dc.typePresentationen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/97017/1/Stansfield2013WaysofCoping-abstract.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/97017/3/CGEA2013-Stansfield.pdf
dc.owningcollnameLearning Health Sciences, Department of (DLHS)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.