View Item 

Show simple item record

Assessing sediment toxicity: Past, present, and future

dc.contributor.authorBurton, G. Allenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-18T18:32:12Z
dc.date.available2014-09-02T14:12:52Zen_US
dc.date.issued2013-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationBurton, G. Allen (2013). "Assessing sediment toxicity: Past, present, and future." Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 32(7): 1438-1440. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/98149>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0730-7268en_US
dc.identifier.issn1552-8618en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/98149
dc.publisherSETACen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.titleAssessing sediment toxicity: Past, present, and futureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiological Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid23733665en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/98149/1/etc2250-sm-0001-SuppTab-S1.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/98149/2/etc2250.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/etc.2250en_US
dc.identifier.sourceEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistryen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMead N. 2012. The rise of megacities. The Guardian, 4 October. [cited 2013 May 1]. Available from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/global‐development/interactive/2012/oct/04/rise‐of‐megacities‐interactiveen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurton GA, De Zwart D, Diamond J, Dyer S, Kapo KE, Liess M, Posthuma L. 2012. Making ecosystem reality checks the status quo. Environ Toxicol Chem 31: 459 – 468.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClements WH, Hickey CW, Kidd KA. 2012. How do aquatic communities respond to contaminants? It depends on the ecological context. Environ Toxicol Chem 31: 1932 – 1940.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIreland DS, Burton GA Jr, Hess GG. 1996. In situ toxicity evaluations of turbidity and photoinduction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environ Toxicol Chem 15: 574 – 581.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReynoldson TB, Thompson SP, Milani D. 2002. Integrating multiple toxicological endpoints in a decision‐making framework for contaminated sediments. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 8: 1569 – 1584.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIngersoll C, Dillon T, Biddinger G. 1997. Ecological Risk Assessment of Contaminated Sediments. SETAC, Pensacola, FL, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWenning RF, Batley GE, Ingersol CG, Moore DW. 2005. Use of Sediment Quality Guidelines & Related Tools for the Assessment of Contaminated Sediments. SETAC, Pensacola, FL, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Research Council. 2007. Sediment Dredging at Superfund Megasites: Assessing the Effectiveness. National Academies, Washington, DC.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimpson SL, Angel BM, Jolley DF. 2004. Metal equilibration in laboratory‐contaminated (spiked) sediments used for the development of whole‐sediment toxicity tests. Chemosphere 54: 597 – 609.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCostello DM, Burton GA, Hammerschmidt CR, Rogevich EC, Schlekat CE. 2011. Nickel phase partitioning and toxicity in field‐deployed sediments. Environ Sci Technol 45: 5798 – 5805.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNimick DA, Gammons CH, Cleansby TE, Madison JP, Skaar D, Brick CM. 2003. Diel variations in dissolved metal concentrations in streams: Occurrence and possible causes. Water Resour Res 39: 1247 – 1264.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeston DP, Holmes RW, You J, Lydy MJ. 2005. Aquatic toxicity due to residential use of pyrethroid insecticides. Environ Sci Technol 39: 9778 – 9784.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Society of Civil Engineers. 2010. Report card for American infrastructure. [cited 2013 May 1]. Available from: http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNebeker AV, Cairns MA, Gakstatter JH, Malueg KW, Schuytema GS, Krawczyk DF. 1984. Biological methods for determining toxicity of contaminated freshwater sediments to invertebrates. Environ Toxicol Chem 3: 617 – 630.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUS Environmental Protection Agency. 2000. Methods for measuring the toxicity and bioaccumulation of sediment‐associated contaminants with freshwater invertebrates, 2nd ed. EPA 600/R‐99/064. Office of Research and Development, Office of Science and Technology, Washington, DC.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUS Environmental Protection Agency. 1994. Methods for assessing the toxicity of sediment‐associated contaminants with estuarine and marine amphipods. EPA 600/R‐94/025. Office of Research and Development, Narragansett, RI.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUS Environmental Protection Agency. 2001. Methods for collection, storage and manipulation of sediments for chemical and toxicological analyses: Technical manual. EPA‐823‐B‐01‐002. Office of Water, Washington, DC.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEnvironment Canada. 1994. Guidance document for collection and preparation of sediments for physicochemical characterization and biological testing. Environmental Protection Series. Report EPA 1/RM/29. Ottawa, Canada.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnkley GT, DiToro DM, Hansen DJ, Berry WJ. 1996. Technical basis and proposal for deriving sediment quality criteria for metals. Environ Toxicol Chem 15: 2056 – 2066.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLong ER, Field LI, MacDonald DD. 1998. Predicting toxicity in marine sediments with numerical sediment quality guidelines. Environ Toxicol Chem 17: 714 – 727.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurton GA. 1991. Assessing toxicity in freshwater sediments. Environ Toxicol Chem 10: 1585 – 1627.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChapman PM, Wang FY. 2001. Assessing sediment contamination in estuaries. Environ Toxicol Chem 20: 3 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUS Environmental Protection Agency. 2007. Sediment toxicity identification evaluation (TIE) phases I, II, and III guidance document. Office of Research and Development. Washington, DC.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurton GA Jr, Nordstrom JF. 2004. An in situ toxicity identification evaluation method. II. Field validation. Environ Toxicol Chem 23: 2851 – 2855.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
etc2250-sm-0001-SuppTab-S1.pdf
Size:
44.93KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
etc2250.pdf
Size:
66.77KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.