View Item 

Show simple item record

Association of RENAL nephrometry score with outcomes of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy

dc.contributor.authorEllison, Jonathan Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorMontgomery, Jeffrey Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorHafez, Khaled Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorMiller, David Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorHe, Changen_US
dc.contributor.authorWolf, J Stuarten_US
dc.contributor.authorWeizer, Alon Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-18T18:32:55Z
dc.date.available2014-08-01T19:11:33Zen_US
dc.date.issued2013-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationEllison, Jonathan S; Montgomery, Jeffrey S; Hafez, Khaled S; Miller, David C; He, Chang; Wolf, J Stuart; Weizer, Alon Z (2013). "Association of RENAL nephrometry score with outcomes of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy." International Journal of Urology (6): 564-570. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/98294>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0919-8172en_US
dc.identifier.issn1442-2042en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/98294
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherRenal Cell Carcinomaen_US
dc.subject.otherKidney Neoplasmsen_US
dc.subject.otherLaparoscopyen_US
dc.subject.otherRoboticsen_US
dc.subject.otherNephron‐Sparing Surgeryen_US
dc.titleAssociation of RENAL nephrometry score with outcomes of minimally invasive partial nephrectomyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid23126585en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/98294/1/iju3222.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03222.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceInternational Journal of Urologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWheat JC, Roberts WW, Hollenbeck BK, Stuart Wolf Jr J, Weizer AZ. Complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Urol. Oncol. 2011; doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.11.003.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimhan J, Smaldone MC, Tsai KJ et al. Perioperative outcomes for robotic and open partial nephrectomy in moderately and highly complex renal lesions. J. Urol. 2012; 187: 2000 – 2004.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J. Urol. 2009; 182: 844 – 853.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR et al. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J. Urol. 2007; 178: 41 – 46.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCanter D, Kutikov A, Manley B et al. Utility of the R.E.N.A.L nephrometry scoring system in objectifying treatment decision‐making of the enhancing renal mass. Urology 2011; 78: 1089 – 1094.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKutikov A, Smaldone MC, Egleston BL et al. Anatomic features of enhancing renal masses predict malignant and high‐grade pathology: a preoperative nomogram using the RENAL Nephrometry score. Eur. Urol. 2011; 60: 241 – 248.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaber GP, White WM, Crouzet S et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: single‐surgeon matched cohort study of 150 patients. Urology 2010; 76: 754 – 758.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeizer AZ, Gilbert SM, Roberts WW, Hollenbeck BK, Wolf JS Jr. Tailoring technique of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy to tumor characteristics. J. Urol. 2008; 180: 1273 – 1278.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevey AS, Greene T, Schluchter MD et al. Glomerular filtration rate measurements in clinical trials. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group and the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 1993; 4: 1159 – 1171.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann. Surg. 2004; 240: 205 – 213.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeight CJ, Atwell TD, Fazzio RT et al. A multidisciplinary evaluation of inter‐reviewer agreement of the nephrometry score and the prediction of long‐term outcomes. J. Urol. 2011; 186: 1223 – 1228.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKolla SB, Spiess PE, Sexton WJ. Interobserver reliability of the RENAL nephrometry scoring system. Urology 2011; 78: 592 – 594.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMufarrij PW, Krane LS, Rajamahanty S, Hemal AK. Does nephrometry scoring of renal tumors predict outcomes in patients selected for robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy? J. Endourol. 2011; 25: 1649 – 1653.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHayn MH, Schwaab T, Underwood W, Kim HL. RENAL nephrometry score predicts surgical outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int. 2011; 108: 876 – 881.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosevear HM, Gellhaus PT, Lightfoot AJ, Kresowik TP, Joudi FN, Tracy CR. Utility of the RENAL nephrometry scoring system in the real world: predicting surgeon operative preference and complication risk. BJU Int. 2012; 109: 700 – 705.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimhan J, Smaldone MC, Tsai KJ et al. Objective measures of renal mass anatomic complexity predict rates of major complications following partial nephrectomy. Eur. Urol. 2011; 60: 724 – 730.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHew MN, Baseskioglu B, Barwari K et al. Critical appraisal of the PADUA classification and assessment of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. J. Urol. 2011; 186: 42 – 46.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
iju3222.pdf
Size:
291.9KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.