Show simple item record

Development and Evaluation of a Palliative Medicine Curriculum for Third-Year Medical Students

dc.contributor.authorvon Gunten, Charles F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMullan, Patriciaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNelesen, Richard A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSoskins, Matten_US
dc.contributor.authorSavoia, Mariaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBuckholz, Garyen_US
dc.contributor.authorWeissman, David E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-25T18:43:16Z
dc.date.available2013-06-25T18:43:16Z
dc.date.issued2012-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationvon Gunten, Charles F.; Mullan, Patricia; Nelesen, Richard A.; Soskins, Matt; Savoia, Maria; Buckholz, Gary; Weissman, David E. (2012). "Development and Evaluation of a Palliative Medicine Curriculum for Third-Year Medical Students." Journal of Palliative Medicine 15(11): 1198-1217. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/98455>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1096-6218en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/98455
dc.description.abstractAbstract Objective: To assess the impact, retention, and magnitude of effect of a required didactic and experiential palliative care curriculum on third-year medical students' knowledge, confidence, and concerns about end-of-life care, over time and in comparison to benchmark data from a national study of internal medicine residents and faculty. Design: Prospective study of third-year medical students prior to and immediately after course completion, with a follow-up assessment in the fourth year, and in comparison to benchmark data from a large national study. Setting: Internal Medicine Clerkship in a public accredited medical school. Participants: Five hundred ninety-three third-year medical students, from July 2002 to December 2007. Main outcome measures: Pre- and postinstruction performance on: knowledge, confidence (self-assessed competence), and concerns (attitudes) about end-of-life care measures, validated in a national study of internal medicine residents and faculty. Medical student's reflective written comments were qualitatively assessed. Intervention: Required 32-hour didactic and experiential curriculum, including home hospice visits and inpatient hospice care, with content drawn from the AMA-sponsored Education for Physicians on End-of-life Care (EPEC) Project. Results: Analysis of 487 paired t tests shows significant improvements, with 23% improvement in knowledge (F1,486=881, p<0.001), 56% improvement in self-reported competence (F1,486=2,804, p<0.001), and 29% decrease in self-reported concern (F1,486=208, p<0.001). Retesting medical students in the fourth year showed a further 5% increase in confidence (p<0.0002), 13% increase in allaying concerns (p<0.0001), but a 6% drop in knowledge. The curriculum's effect size on M3 students' knowledge (0.56) exceeded that of a national cross-sectional study comparing residents at progressive training levels (0.18) Themes identified in students' reflective comments included perceived relevance, humanism, and effectiveness of methods used to teach and assess palliative care education. Conclusions: We conclude that required structured didactic and experiential palliative care during the clinical clerkship year of medical student education shows significant and largely sustained effects indicating students are better prepared than a national sample of residents and attending physicians.en_US
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersen_US
dc.titleDevelopment and Evaluation of a Palliative Medicine Curriculum for Third-Year Medical Studentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid22845026en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/98455/1/jpm%2E2010%2E0502.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/jpm.2010.0502en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Palliative Medicineen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.