Show simple item record

Rising Annual Costs of Dizziness Presentations to U.S. Emergency Departments

dc.contributor.authorSaber Tehrani, Ali S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCoughlan, Diarmuiden_US
dc.contributor.authorHsieh, Yu Hsiangen_US
dc.contributor.authorMantokoudis, Georgiosen_US
dc.contributor.authorKorley, Fredrick K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKerber, Kevin A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFrick, Kevin D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNewman‐toker, David E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Sandraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-02T20:51:40Z
dc.date.available2014-09-02T14:12:53Zen_US
dc.date.issued2013-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationSaber Tehrani, Ali S.; Coughlan, Diarmuid; Hsieh, Yu Hsiang; Mantokoudis, Georgios; Korley, Fredrick K.; Kerber, Kevin A.; Frick, Kevin D.; Newman‐toker, David E. ; Schneider, Sandra (2013). "Rising Annual Costs of Dizziness Presentations to U.S. Emergency Departments." Academic Emergency Medicine (7): 689-696. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/99059>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1069-6563en_US
dc.identifier.issn1553-2712en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/99059
dc.description.abstractObjectives Dizziness and vertigo account for roughly 4% of chief symptoms in the emergency department ( ED ). Little is known about the aggregate costs of ED evaluations for these patients. The authors sought to estimate the annual national costs associated with ED visits for dizziness. Methods This cost study of adult U.S. ED visits presenting with dizziness or vertigo combined public‐use ED visit data (1995 to 2009) from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey ( NHAMCS ) and cost data (2003 to 2008) from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey ( MEPS ). We calculated total visits, test utilization, and ED diagnoses from NHAMCS . Diagnosis groups were defined using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Clinical Classifications Software ( HCUP ‐ CCS ). Total visits and the proportion undergoing neuroimaging for future years were extrapolated using an autoregressive forecasting model. The average ED visit cost‐per‐diagnosis‐group from MEPS were calculated, adjusting to 2011 dollars using the Hospital Personal Health Care Expenditures price index. An overall weighted mean across the diagnostic groups was used to estimate total national costs. Year 2011 data are reported in 2011 dollars. Results The estimated number of 2011 US ED visits for dizziness or vertigo was 3.9 million (95% confidence interval [ CI ] = 3.6 to 4.2 million). The proportion undergoing diagnostic imaging by computed tomography ( CT ), magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI ), or both in 2011 was estimated to be 39.9% (39.4% CT , 2.3% MRI ). The mean per‐ ED ‐dizziness‐visit cost was $1,004 in 2011 dollars. The total extrapolated 2011 national costs were $3.9 billion. HCUP ‐ CCS key diagnostic groups for those presenting with dizziness and vertigo included the following (fraction of dizziness visits, cost‐per‐ ED ‐visit, attributable annual national costs): otologic/vestibular (25.7%; $768; $757 million), cardiovascular (16.5%, $1,489; $941 million), and cerebrovascular (3.1%; $1059; $127 million). Neuroimaging was estimated to account for about 12% of the total costs for dizziness visits in 2011 ( CT scans $360 million, MRI scans $110 million). Conclusions Total U.S. national costs for patients presenting with dizziness to the ED are substantial and are estimated to now exceed $4 billion per year (about 4% of total ED costs). Rising costs over time appear to reflect the rising prevalence of ED visits for dizziness and increased rates of imaging use. Future economic studies should focus on the specific breakdown of total costs, emphasizing areas of high cost and use that might be safely reduced. Resumen Incremento Anual de los Costes de las Atenciones por Mareo en los Servicios de Urgencias de Estados Unidos Objectivos El mareo y el vértigo suman aproximadamente el 4% de los motivos de consulta en el servicio de urgencias ( SU ). Se conoce poco sobre los costes globales de las evaluaciones del SU en estos pacientes. Se buscó estimar los costes anuales nacionales asociados con las visitas al SU por mareo. Metodología Este estudio de costes de visitas al SU de adultos norteamericanos que acudieron con mareo o vértigo combinó los datos públicos de las visitas a los SU (1995 a 2009) recogidos por el National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey ( NHAMCS ) y los costes (2003 a 2008) recogidos por el Medical Expenditure Panel Survey ( MEPS ). Se calcularon el total de visitas, el uso de pruebas diagnósticas y los diagnósticos del SU del NHAMCS . Los grupos diagnósticos se definieron según el Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Clinical Classifications Software ( HCUP ‐ CCS ). Los datos del año 2011 se documentaron en dólares de 2011. El total de visitas y la proporción de neuroimagen llevada a cabo en los futuros años se extrapoló usando un modelo predictivo autorregresivo. La media del coste por visita al SU por grupo diagnóstico del MEPS se calculó, ajustándose a dólares de 2011, mediante el índice de precios de los Hospital Personal Health Care Expenditures. Se utilizó una media ponderada global entre los grupos diagnósticos para estimar los costes totales nacionales. Resultados El número de visitas al SU en Estados Unidos en 2011 por mareo o vértigo fue de 3,9 millones ( IC 95% = 3,6 a 4,2 millones). El porcentaje de pruebas diagnósticas de imagen llevadas a cabo por tomografía computarizada ( TC ), resonancia magnética ( RM ) o ambas en 2011 se estimó en un 39,9% (39,4% TC , 2,3% RM ). La media de coste por visita al SU por mareo fue de 1.004 dólares de 2011. Los costes totales, extrapolados para todo el país, fueron de 3.900 millones de dólares. Los grupos diagnósticos HCUP ‐ CCS para aquéllos que presentaron mareo o vértigo incluyeron los siguientes (proporción de visitas por mareo; coste por visita al SU ; costes anuales nacionales atribuibles): otológico/vestibular (25,7%; 768 dólares; 757 millones de dólares), cardiovascular (16,5%, 1.489 dólares; 941 millones de dólares) y cerebrovascular (3,1%; 1.059 dólares; 127 millones de dólares). Se estimó una suma en la neuroimagen del 12% del total de costes para las visitas por mareo en 2011 (360 millones de dólares para la TC y 110 millones de dólares para la RM ). Conclusiones Los costes totales en Estados Unidos para los pacientes que acuden por mareo al SU son sustanciales, y se estima que sobrepasan en estos momentos los 4.000 millones de dólares por año (aproximadamente un 4% de los costes totales del SU ). El incremento de los costes con el paso del tiempo parece reflejar el crecimiento de la prevalencia de las visitas al SU por mareo y el aumento de porcentajes de utilización de la neuroimagen. Futuros estudios económicos deberían centrarse en el desglose de los costes totales, y hacer énfasis en las áreas de alto uso y coste que pueden ser reducidas sin riesgo.en_US
dc.publisherAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality. U.S. Department of Health & Human Servicesen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.titleRising Annual Costs of Dizziness Presentations to U.S. Emergency Departmentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid23859582en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/99059/1/acem12168.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/99059/2/acem12168-sup-0001-DataSupplementS1.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/acem.12168en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAcademic Emergency Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMachlin SR, Chowdhury SR, Ezzati‐Rice T, et al. Estimation Procedures for the 2007 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Household Component. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 2010.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSavitz SI, Caplan LR, Edlow JA. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of cerebellar infarction. Acad Emerg Med. 2007; 14: 63 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChalela JA, Kidwell CS, Nentwich LM, Luby M, Butman JA, Demchuk AM. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute stroke: a prospective comparison. Lancet. 2007; 369: 293 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWasay M, Dubey N, Bakshi R. Dizziness and yield of emergency head CT scan: is it cost effective? Emerg Med J. 2005; 22: 312.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLawhn‐Heath C, Buckle C, Christoforidis G, Straus C. Utility of head CT in the evaluation of vertigo/dizziness in the emergency department. Emerg Radiol. 2013; 20: 45 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSyamal M, Ahsan S, Yaremchuk K. Cost analysis and efficacy of imaging in evaluating dizzy patients in the emergency department. In: Abstracts of the Triological Society Combined Sections Meeting. Miami, FL, 2012. Available at: http://www.triomeetingposters.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/164.pdf. Accessed May 4, 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChase M, Joyce NR, Carney E, et al. ED patients with vertigo: can we identify clinical factors associated with acute stroke? Am J Emerg Med. 2012; 30: 587 – 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality. MEPS: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Available at: http://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/about_meps/survey_back.jsp. Accessed May 3, 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCaig LF, McLemore T. Plan and operation of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Survey. Series 1: programs and collection procedures. Vital Health Stat 1. 1994: 1 – 78.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health Interview Survey. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/about_nhis.htm/. Accessed May 3, 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBisdorff A, Von Brevern M, Lempert T, Newman‐Toker DE. Classification of vestibular symptoms: towards an international classification of vestibular disorders. J Vestib Res. 2009; 19: 1 – 13.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. 2009 NHAMCS Micro‐data File Documentation. Available at: ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Dataset_Documentation/NHAMCS/doc09.pdf. Accessed May 3, 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCaig L, Woodwell D. Analyzing data from the NAMCS and the NHAMCS. In: 2006 Data Users Conference Presentations. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ppt/duc2006/Mccaig_28.ppt. Accessed May 4, 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiemens Medical Solutions USA. 2011 Medicare Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment Schedule Rates: Computed Tomography Procedures. Available at: http://www.medical.siemens.com/siemens/en_US/rg_marcom_FBAs/files/Reimbursement/CT_2011_Final_HOPPS_Payment_Rates.pdf. Accessed May 3, 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiemens Medical Solutions USA. 2011 Medicare Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment Schedule Rates: Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Available at: http://www.medical.siemens.com/siemens/en_US/rg_marcom_FBAs/files/Reimbursement/MR_2011_Final_HOPPS_Payment_Rates.pdf. Accessed May 3, 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKorley FK, Pham JC, Kirsch TD. Use of advanced radiology during visits to US emergency departments for injury‐related conditions, 1998‐2007. JAMA. 2010; 304: 1465 – 71.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrossman SA, Fischer C, Bar JL, et al. The yield of head CT in syncope: a pilot study. Intern Emerg Med. 2007; 2: 46 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTarnutzer AA, Berkowitz AL, Robinson KA, Hsieh YH, Newman‐Toker DE. Does my dizzy patient have a stroke? A systematic review of bedside diagnosis in acute vestibular syndrome. CMAJ. 2011; 183: E571 – 92.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTurski P, Wippold F, Cornelius R. ACR appropriateness criteria–vertigo and hearing loss. In: American College of Radiology (ACR) Expert Panel on Neurologic Imaging; 2008.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBhattacharyya N, Baugh RF, Orvidas L, et al. Clinical practice guideline: benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008; 139: S47 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKattah JC, Talkad AV, Wang DZ, Hsieh YH, Newman‐Toker DE. HINTS to diagnose stroke in the acute vestibular syndrome: three‐step bedside oculomotor examination more sensitive than early MRI diffusion‐weighted imaging. Stroke. 2009; 40: 3504 – 10.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith‐Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169: 2078 – 86.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKerber KA, Morgenstern LB, Meurer WJ, et al. Nystagmus assessments documented by emergency physicians in acute dizziness presentations: a target for decision support? Acad Emerg Med. 2011; 18: 619 – 26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEagles D, Stiell IG, Clement CM, et al. International survey of emergency physicians’ priorities for clinical decision rules. Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 15: 177 – 82.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewman‐Toker DE, Hsieh YH, Camargo CA Jr, Pelletier AJ, Butchy GT, Edlow JA. Spectrum of dizziness visits to US emergency departments: cross‐sectional analysis from a nationally representative sample. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008; 83: 765 – 75.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewman‐Toker DE, Cannon LM, Stofferahn ME, Rothman RE, Hsieh YH, Zee DS. Imprecision in patient reports of dizziness symptom quality: a cross‐sectional study conducted in an acute care setting. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007; 82: 1329 – 40.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDallara J, Lee C, McIntosh L, Sloane PD, Morris D. ED length‐of‐stay and illness severity in dizzy and chest‐pain patients. Am J Emerg Med. 1994; 12: 421 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKerber KA, Meurer WJ, West BT, Fendrick AM. Dizziness presentations in U.S. emergency departments, 1995‐2004. Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 15: 744 – 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewman‐Toker DE, Camargo CA Jr, Hsieh YH, Pelletier AJ, Edlow JA. Disconnect between charted vestibular diagnoses and emergency department management decisions: a cross‐sectional analysis from a nationally representative sample. Acad Emerg Med. 2009; 16: 970 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKerber KA, Schweigler L, West BT, Fendrick AM, Morgenstern LB. Value of computed tomography scans in ED dizziness visits: analysis from a nationally representative sample. Am J Emerg Med. 2010; 28: 1030 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim AS, Sidney S, Klingman JG, Johnston SC. Practice variation in neuroimaging to evaluate dizziness in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2012; 30: 665 – 72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStanton VA, Hsieh YH, Camargo CA, et al. Overreliance on symptom quality in diagnosing dizziness: results of a multicenter survey of emergency physicians. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007; 82: 1319 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEdlow JA, Newman‐Toker DE, Savitz SI. Diagnosis and initial management of cerebellar infarction. Lancet Neurol. 2008; 7: 951 – 64.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.