<TEXT N="B01035380">
<BODY>
<DIV1>
<P><PB REF="00000001.tif" SEQ="00000001" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="TPG" CNF="775" N="1">
USE OF
CHLORIDE OF LIM0E AND LIQUID CHLORINE
AS STERILIZING AGENTS,
HISTORICAhL DEVELOPMENT:-  Although chlorine is one
of the most widely distributed elements, yet its discovery
is of relatively recent date.  The fL-mous Swedish chemist,
Scheele, is given credit for its discovery*
It is a heavy gas. pf green color, -and of very corrosive
properties. It attacks violently xreta.l and organic bTodies.
It is soluble in water and gfives a greenish solution of
irritating smell, a.nd soon deaoi.oposes, especially when
exposed to light. The gca-s ca.nb;:el,Iiiuified,by compressing
it in special machines, airid i s;ikAep-t -and transported in strong
steel cylinders ard has be-eo:'iLe?:] E m,rcial article.
The bleaching' power&gt;.Tf -th'. *ggaCs a.ttracted first
attention to its use. Prior to.th is most of the linen wras
sent to Holland and Fla nders where&amp;'a highly profi table but
conservative bleaching industry flourished, based on a
fini cs'ing process in which ther use of buttermiilk seemed
indispensable. The first use of chlorina (as a blea.ching
ag-nt resulted in the rotting of the linen. But this
defect was remedied by neutralizing the obnoxious properties
of the gas by absorbing  it first into a solution of alkali.
Soda v-as used at first but i7as expensive,:ind after twelve
years of labor Dr. Henry succeeded in substituting milk of
liume, thus converting the powerful chlorine gas into a
dry, portable, handy form containing 35^ of efficient chlorine.
By combinring it with  slaked lime, "chloride of lime" was
formed. This is also known as "Bleach" ".Bleaching Powder"



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000002.tif" SEQ="00000002" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="100" N="00000002">



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000003.tif" SEQ="00000003" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="815" N="2">
2
"Hypochlorite of Lime", etc.
The industrial use of a#loride of lime dates from
the year 1800. An interesting comparison of the amount
manufactured and the price per ton   i s given by  Mactear as
follo s:1799 - 1800   52 tons @ $680o00    per ton
180o  147  "     @  54550    i 
1820  333  "       29200o 
182   910  "       131 00    " 
1870  925  "        41,50 
The production of chlorine was of necessity linked to
th e soda  industry, or Leblane process, since the initial
raw miaterial, common salt or sodiuk chloride, is the same
for both,   The greatest development of the production of
chloride of lime dates from the introduction of the British
Alkali Act about 1865, when the so da manufacturers wiere
compelled to cease discharginog large volumes of hydrochloric
acid vapors into the air, or condensed acid into the streams.
The available outlet for this bothersome by-product was the
manufacture of chloride of lime; hence the development of
a market for i it use. From this act to prevent a nuisance
has grown up an industry which now gives u: not only a
material for bleaching paper and textiles, but also a
disinfectant and deodorizing agent,
During the early years of its development a large portion
of the hydrochloric acid had to be wasted, as the market for
chloride of lime was much more limited than the demand for
alkali so
About this time a new method for making soda,from salt
and ammnonia, known as the Solvay processwas foundo  In this
process no chlorine was given off with which to form chloride
of lime a, a by-product. For this reason the old Leblanc



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000004.tif" SEQ="00000004" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="100" N="00000004">



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000005.tif" SEQ="00000005" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="842" N="3">
3
process was able to hold its own due to the ever growing
demand for chloride of lime.
But in 1890 a new rival entered the race. The first K1
electrolytic works, for the electric production of alkali
and chlorine was installed in Frankfort, Germany. By this
process soditum chloride was split into its constituents,
sodium and chlorine.  The sodium uniting with the water foxms
caustic soda. The chlorine is used for various purposes, It
is either liquified and transported in steel cylinders, or
combined with slaked lime, forming chloride of lime. This
is packed in barrels or steel drums, and generally contains
from 30% to 405 available chlorine.
USE OF CHLORIDE OF LIMlE:- This new process developed very
rapidly not only in Germany but in other countries more
especially in the United States. In 1912 it was estimated
that more than 30,000 electric horsepower were used daily
in its production. In 1912 the world's production  of
chloride of lime approximated 400,000 metric tons.
The statistics for 1910 show the following  production:Great Britain       110,000  metric tons,
Germany              90,000 
United States        80,000 "o 
France and Belgiuwn  40000           "
Aus trai, Italy, Spain 30 000  t     "
Russia               22,000 "        "
The United States started making Chlorife of lime in
1895, and the following table  will illustrate the
development:


</P>
<P><PB REF="00000006.tif" SEQ="00000006" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="100" N="00000006">



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000007.tif" SEQ="00000007" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="816" N="4">
4
UNITED STATES IMPORTS AND PRODUCTION
OF CHLORIDE OF LIME2
(metric tons)
Year              Imports         Production
1850               2,810
1855               4,5 60
1860               7,850
1865              10,500
1870              1o,50oo
1875              22,000
1880              34,000
1885              43,300
1890              45,100
1895              45, 600
1900                   01, 0     10,000
1905              43,600         17,800
1910              42, 600        81,000
Calciumx oxychloride, Ca 0 C12, is generally accepted
to be the essential constituent of dry chloride of lime, and
to undergo in contact with water, the following change:2 Ca 0 C12       Ca ( $ C )2  t   Ca C12
calcium oxychloride:   calciun hypochlorite +
calcium chloride
Chloride of lime is soluble in about twenty times its
weight of water, leaving a small insoluble residue, mostly
calcium hydrat(o   In an aqueous bibution, calcium hypochlorite
forms the only valuable constituent, the calcium chloride
being inert and valueless.
In its industrial application of bleaching, deodorizing,
or disinfection, chloride of lime does not act by its
chlorine, but by its oxygen. Its action is rot "hhlorination"
bu t"oi dati on"
Chloride of lime is valued and sold on its percentage
of "available chlorine", a term which indicates the whole
amount of free chlorine that becomes available in
decomposing chloride of lime by means of strong acid. Half



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000008.tif" SEQ="00000008" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="100" N="00000008">



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000009.tif" SEQ="00000009" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="831" N="5">
of the available chlorine is derived from the calcium
hypochlorite, and half from the hydrochloric acid employed either
as such  or generated from the calcium chloride thru action
of another strong acid'
In keeping and storing chloride of lime the factors
to guard against are carbonic acid, moisture, light and heatO
Therefore it should be  kept in closed veosels, and in a dry
cool place.
Lunge ( Sulphuris Acid and Alkali, Vol 3, p.642)
gives two typical analyses of commercial chloride of lime
which may be of interest as follows:Available chlorine    37,00 %    38 30 %
Chlorine as chlorides 0,35        0 59
Chlorine as chlorates  0.*25      0.08
Lime                  44.49      43 34
Iron oxide             0o 05      0.04iw:
Magnesia               0,40       0.31
1 umi na               0.43       0.41
Carbon dioxide         0,18       0,31
Silica, etc.           0,40       0.30
Water and loss        16.45      16. 3
100 00     100 00
The fact that the available chlorine or hypochlorate
is quite easily soluble, even in fairly cold water, and the
undissolved sludge of hydrated lime, silica, etc., settles
readily makes it possible to obtain clear colutions of
chloride of limes for a constant feed in water or sewage
purification, A few simple rules should be observed:
First, aco not mix too stiff a paste, otherwise a
gelatinizing action takes place and greater difficulty is
settling is encountered. Never mix a paste with less than
one-half gallon of water for one pound of chloride of lime.
Second, it is not necessary or desirable to grind or



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000010.tif" SEQ="00000010" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="100" N="00000010">



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000011.tif" SEQ="00000011" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="846" N="6">
6
brea)k up the lumps too thoroughly; the available chlorine
nearly all dissolves readily and too much agitation is
detrimental to prompt settling.
A- stock solution of chloride of lime containing
approximately 2% available chlorine may be prepared as
follOws:Three hundred pounds qpf commercial chloride of lime
( 35% available chlorine) equals lo5 pounds of available
chlorine, assuming a recovery of 160  pounds of this free
from sludge. These 100 pounds must be contained in 600
gallons to give a clear standard 2% slution* Due allovwance
must be made for proper washing of the sludge, it thus contains
in addition to the suspended lime and silica, a solution of
equal strength to that of the clear liquid. The amount of
sludge ise equivalent to about 1 gallon $or each 5 lbs. of
chloride of lime used,
Various forms of apparatus may be used. The essential
parts are illustrated in Figs, 1, 2, and 3. This apparatus
is an emergency outfit used by the State Board of Health at
Monroe, Michigan during the Typhoid Fever epidemic of 1915.
It consists of a mixing barrel, two storage barrels, and a
dosing box. The hypochlorite solution was mixed in the upper
barrel, and after time was allowed for settlement, the cleard
liquid was drarwn off into one of the storage barrels below,
thru a pipp placed far enough aheve the bottom of the mixing
barrel to avoid drawing off any of the settled sludge. The
amount of dose applied was regulated by hand control of a small
pet-cock thru which the soluL.tion flowed from the dosing  box,
The dosing box was fed from two storage barrels in turn and a



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000012.tif" SEQ="00000012" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="100" N="00000012">



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000013.tif" SEQ="00000013" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="126" N="7">
Hfed)CY  //YPoeHi-oftra                zDoil,,Y6            AppH^S~rUS.5                                 BY
7H',e       5-r.crfe                B             ol4s fHa9TH..  s..  &gt;.. k. v.:   a:. g:   x   s~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s s s.;...........3...s..s........
i;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;i
II  ls: 1....
I Ii llllllllllijijiljijil:                                                              I..........................
/gs1                                                                                                                  ri:................................................................................;  0  0  t00  ffffff  t0000  tS~tSSS:  0  f;  ff   t00:  t?  0   0   ff  f~t  0  0  t0 0:  0:  f  ft   t  0::  C:0000S'St00000
f0000  ff  ff  DDS  f........24   0;fX  0  0  fff  0;;  0.............;; ~ sz~     I mxIergenS&gt;.y  I-yp ilesllte:AppItuS&lt;:0:: i-i-iri~i~i~i-i                  0BoN: forX:;     eis   -te 9..
~~~::-: _ &mdash;-&mdash;:-:: -:_-:: &mdash;:i-i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~..............................................................................................:::::::::....... -.......................... - X -...........:::                   iii~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i:                                I~~~~.............................
~~~~~~~~~~~:~~~~~~~:::::a::::3;1:1::~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~..............
~~~~~~~~~~~~::::i:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.....................................i~,iiiii i~~i' ~lii~i:;
I:::~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    ~       ~      ~       ~      ~            0::i      11~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~......
Itlllllllllll~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~l~~~l'i-Ij-j- l~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ii~~~~~~i~~~j-jj~~~~~~~~~j~~~j                                     ii:\~~........:j::::::~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~..........:::::::::I   ~:::~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.........
~~~~lii~~~~~~~~~~l~~~~~~~~~~~ "::::::::::::::jj:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.......:i,,e:,::                   _r:                                            sii         i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~...............................:::r:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::f                    I11  iii~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~....................................~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I
j:::-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.......
i~~~d~~P~~~k~~B~~X-   -:) I-l-ll-ll'iiiiiiiiR~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~:~~d~~~i ~ ~............:::::t:E _:: &mdash;-&mdash; i_-:_ &mdash;:;i'iii~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~iiiiti_::::i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.........
~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::P:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;~:::::::~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:::...................................
~~~~~~::::::::::::::::::~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~..................
t                                                                              -a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.......:::                                         ii:].I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~lii~~~~~~~~~~~::~~~~~~~~~::~~~~~~~~~:~~~~~~.~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~~~:Q-..............:  -- ---  --  -:                ------&mdash;:'-:  --::: -  -:- -::-  -  -: --::: &mdash;-::  -:  --  --  - -  -..............:: 
-::::::::  I::-:::::::::  _:  -::'~ ~ ~~~~~~.................. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d.~:3



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000014.tif" SEQ="00000014" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="100" N="00000014">



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000015.tif" SEQ="00000015" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="845" N="8">
7
constant head of solution in it was miintained by a ballcock. By knowing the ratio of pumping, it was an easy matter to
aajust the pet-cock  so any desired ratio of flow of hypochlorite solution might be obtained. In this case a quart
measure was used and ratios figured out in pints of hypochlorite per minute,
For a permanent affair  the tanks sho1uld be made of
concrete or at least tled with cement, and adjustable means
provided for  drawing off the clear liquor from above as
well as an outlet for removing the sludge at the bottom.
It is recommended that the solution be allowed to
settle for at least 8 hours and preferably over night.
The standard stock solution thus prepared will contain
available chlorine equal to -J lb. of chloride of lime per
gallon, or about 2% available chlorine or 6% of chloride of
lime by weight.



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000016.tif" SEQ="00000016" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="100" N="00000016">



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000017.tif" SEQ="00000017" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="540" N="9">
Lbs. Chloride of lime
o)  C)  c' -ru N)  C  C  CO -  )  &gt;  )  1per 100,00000 gal.water
^ 0  2  0  0  0    r F  H*..,,  Parts Chloride of Lime
i.               0.            Parts Chlorine per    H  t
O  ~J  O   OO ~L^ eo  ~  ~  4s  tl,,
o      o.coD  o  0  o oH.   o IU \  oN co  1,000,000, 00 parts  wiater 
H ^..0.o0 0 0                           Pr     oe
N H H- H H H H     o    o   o  Co  H Grains Chloride of Lime  d
Ho0,O Co o \  c.    o        a p on 0  P per gallon of water  O
o
*..    *       Grains Available:  H
Co)  0 0 0 0 C) o   Coo       o 0  C 0  C)  Chlorine per gallon of  c
&lt;\ -.           oj   to PJ,.,  o,   H' C 
Q)  Jtf cHJ  0'  H       ^ 3    so W'-A  w ater.         P'
0
b tmi
Drops Chloride of Lime  t-.)  U. )t  to L 0 N)  No N  ~  H   H  H  H.   Sol. 2% Chlorine or  H 
--  \Jr,  NO O)  _  vI O        x  N   lb. Chloride of lime  H  )
\  o C)  o  \  o  \n o   \  o  \u o  Jni  o  \ o  (per gal) used per
gallon of water..
e3



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000018.tif" SEQ="00000018" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="100" N="00000018">



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000019.tif" SEQ="00000019" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="840" N="10">
LIQUID CILORINE:- Liquid chlorine is the trade name
for liquefied chlorine gas. As stated befors the gas is
generated by the electrolysis of brine.  It is dried,
compressed and cooled until it liquefies. In the coursd of
this process the gas is relieved of all such impurities
as water, carbon dioxide, oxygen, air, etc., so that the
final product represents the elemenit chlorine in its most
efficient form of about 99.5 to 99.9 per cent purity.
Chlorine in this liquid state occupies only one
four-hundredth ( 1/ 400 ) of the space of the gas under
the same t emperature conditions anrd is placed in steel
cylinders of about eighty lbs. weight having a capacity
of 100 to 110 lbs.  These units of about 180 lbs. gross
xweight have been found to be the most convenient form for
all practical purposes. The chlorine can be drawn off
at will by opening the valve on the top of the cylinder.
It does not matter how -amuch or how little is taken from
the cylinder, liquid chlorine being the pure compressed
gas, does not deteriorate or lose in efficiency by storing,
as in the case with bleaching powder.
The industry of chlorine liquefaction is of very
recent date in this country, the first liquefying plant
having been started only seven years ago. Since then the
industry and the introduction of its product into new fields
of application have grmaw very rapidly and it is now used
extensively in textile mills, for general bleaching purposes
and by the chemical manufact uring industries in various
processes such as detinning, etc., after having shown



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000020.tif" SEQ="00000020" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="100" N="00000020">



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000021.tif" SEQ="00000021" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="831" N="11">
considerable advantages as to high efficiency, easier
handling and higher economy  than other and older methods
of application,
Only after chlorine had thus been brought into a form
whdch permitted convenient ha &mdash;ndling  by the trade in general
could it be considered feasible to conduct experiments with
the idea of using its well known bactericidal properties for
water sterilization by direct application.
These experiments have been carried on by different
scientists, the first to publish any results being Maj. C.R.
Darnell, who in the fall of 1910 conducted laboratory tests
with very good results basteriologically, but the method
employed was not one of practical application for a large
water -upply. Many experiments have been conducted since that
time and many good results obtained.
All of this experimental mrk demonstrated the
advantageous features of the use of liquid chlorine and
definitely determined its exceptional bactericidal properties,
yet on the other hand -he drawbacks and inefficiencies of the
various methods of applyi.ng the chemical were forcibly impressed upon the minds of those who attempted its control.
The difficulty atrose in the develop:ment of a commercial and
practical apparatus for efficiently regulating the rate of
flow of the chlorine gas. Most of the failures   on this
score were due to the strong corrosive effects of chlorine on
all kinds of metals, wood,:rubber, etc.,
Various types of controlling apparatus have been
developed. They are knownm as either thie wet or dry  f eed.
In the dry feed the gas goes direct to the water supply,



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000022.tif" SEQ="00000022" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="100" N="00000022">



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000023.tif" SEQ="00000023" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="841" N="12">
while in thewet feed the gas is first absorbed by a small
quantity of water lwhich in turn is fed into the supply ~
The apparatus for the wet feed usually consists of
a series of pipe coils for connecting the cylinders of gas
to a manifold hpon which is placed a pressure gauge with
a specially prepared diaphragm for determining the initial
pressure and indicating when the cylinders are exhausted.
Beyond this gauge two pressure regulating devices are
installed, the first being used primarily for recucing the
initial cylinder pressure and maintaining it at a predetermined
mamimum, while the seoond is used for r-egulating this
reduced pressure through a range sufficient to give the
desired discharge of gas. To a branch outlet on the line
between the last controlling valve and the discharge orifice
there is attached a;low pressure chlorine gauge which is
calibrateed  empirically to indicate the rate of flow of
g;as in pounds per hour. After passing the discharge outlet
the gas is conducted by composition hardrubber tubing to an
absorption tower designed to secure a thorough admixture
of the chlorine in a minor quantity of water without the
escape of any gas to the atmosphere~ This tower may be made.
of stoneware, composition or any material which iill resist
the chemical  action of the gas during the absorption process.
This tower is open to atmospheric pressure at the top and
any failure bo secure an absolute absorption is indicated and
known immediately by the presence of free chlorine in the
atmosphere. The chlorinated water solution flows by gravity
from the bottom of the tower to any desired point of
application to the water supply'. It has been found that
hard rubber  composition makes a very good material for



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000024.tif" SEQ="00000024" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="100" N="00000024">



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000025.tif" SEQ="00000025" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="122" N="13">
?)/Pex OF CHLO~IlVE /CONTROL/ 1R4PPA/TU~..E..~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~......
I
Model "D" glarer  T y p e   d pparatus
1 Wl11t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~................S lS.!iiE tERaiSuEiii~:::EEEg:::E::::E:::EE~E:0::f::05Vi~ ES DnSigt::~a:::::::::::::!:  -0-::::::S:
Model "C"  Metter ty~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~00S00000000000000e.00000000000000000I0000000000000000000para000000000:00000000000W0000000us00: ig 0000............
l~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~........I......
v  S  -  -. W;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.........



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000026.tif" SEQ="00000026" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="100" N="00000026">



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000027.tif" SEQ="00000027" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="108" N="14">
~                                            ~i~,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~44,i,',44,1  &gt;~~~~t
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4..,~44.....&gt;4,
6~~~~~~~~~4~ ~ ~ ~~~~~/ ~:::i ~l ~
LLI F
----------------
I:1;                       4 4   4
------- - -- - -------
MEc.
CO3
SEEM44444  4,&gt; 4
h~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~                                            &gt;4&gt;444&gt;~. 4
Bgl~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~44                                                44 4444444r4  -
a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4.44/4~It~B
C~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~.~.&gt;'4.444  44&gt;4           44~4.  444&gt;4  &lt; Wt2 W;"::: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 44,. &gt;4444444444,&gt;  &gt; 4     ~  -  444
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~44        &gt;4444  4b 4  &gt;4.'r&gt;a24 &gt;~44.
44                           &gt;4&lt;4    4444&gt;&lt;4&gt;4&gt;4&gt;4~4.'4~~~~~~~T~t
44                               &gt;&lt;44444&gt;&lt;4t&gt;o  ",44..4.,4.,.,,.~&gt;4&gt;44444444444444&lt;~~&gt;. 4  444444444/4   4&gt;4&gt;4&gt;::::~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 4F; ~.444444+"'' 
2  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  ~   ~  ~   ~   ~~~       ~~~~~~~~~~! ""\~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4
4~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 44~
44
~~~~~~p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    ~     ~      ~     ~     ~          r~~~~~~~4
Fi\~~~~~~~~~~'iD8~~~~~~~~~4i~~~~~i~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~~;~~~~1.  &gt; &gt;444.  4
i::~~:::: -::::::-:-::::::: s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000028.tif" SEQ="00000028" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="100" N="00000028">



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000029.tif" SEQ="00000029" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="835" N="15">
the construction of these towers.  They are filled with
coke tomi give surface  for the vwa.ter ihich trickles down
from the top.
CO0lMlPARISONS:-  Mr..Frank D. West, chemist in
charge of the Torresdale Laboratory, claims the following
advantages of liquid chlorine over chloride of lime as
used at the Torresdale filtration plant:
1. That liquid chlorine is an absolutely pure chemical
concentrated in small cylindiers while chloride of lime is
bulky, requiring large spaae for storing.
2. As to the saving in space required a one hund/,;ed
pound cylinder occupies  64 sq. inches floor space. A
stock'or fifty days at two hundred pounds per day would
occupy a space of 45 ftuare feet five feet high. 20,000 lbs.
of bleach, enoug for but seenteen days at twelve hundred
pounds per day would occupy 160 sq. feet. Cn a basis of
6 to 1 about ten to eleven times -as much space is required
for bleach as for liquid chlorine.
3. With efficient controlling devices liquid chlorine
will eliminate the disagreeable odors and corrosive influences
of chloride of lime; consequently the installation may be
placed in position where the use of chloride of lime is
impossible.
4. Liquid chlorine will retain its full efficiency over
unlimited time whereas chloride of lime deteriorates rapidly.
This is onie of the best arguments for liquid chlorine,
especially for small installations.
%. The floor space occupied by liquid chlorine plants
is small, whereas chloride of lime installations require



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000030.tif" SEQ="00000030" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="100" N="00000030">



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000031.tif" SEQ="00000031" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="776" N="16">
large mixing tanks, etc, The space occupied at Torresdale
ior bleach treatment  i:d ependent  f the. spca  for weiging
was 22 by 16 feet;   for tne liquid chlorine a-.pparatus; the
cabinet is 2' by 4.4' and the space occupied by the twvers
is 10' b:y about 2',
6. The reaction wirth liquid chlorine is simplified,
while that vith c:loride bf lime is   complex and less effective
at low temperatures.
The reactioYns for chloride of lime probably are
C122
Ca2         CO   H20  =   Ca C03t 2 C10H t CaC12
a2O C1      2                J
2 C10H =   2 HC! ~   0
2 HC1 + CaCO     Ca C12 t H2   - C02
Jackson ( Sterilization of Cleveland Water Supply)
gives the first part of the reactiin as
CaC12 + H20 + C02 = CaC03+ HOC1 + HC1
For liquid chlorine Jackson gives
C12 + H 0 - HOC1+ HC1      and
HOC1 + HC1 = 2 IHC1 t- 0
It is a question if hypochlorous acid is formed and
the author prefers the simple reaction   of
C1 2   H 0     2 HC1 + 
2     2
This is a liberation of 23   - by weight of nascent
oxygen and which together with'the powerful disinfecting
action of the chlorine itself acting before it decomposes watAr
gives the increased efficiency.
7., According to iMr. G, ID Jeckson (Proceedings American
Waterworks As$$ociAtion, 1913) one pound liquid chlorine equals



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000032.tif" SEQ="00000032" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="100" N="00000032">



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000033.tif" SEQ="00000033" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="810" N="17">
nine pounds chloride of lime; according to Mr. J. A. Kienle
(Proceedings of American Waterworks Association, 1913)  it
equals eight. Theoretically it -;hould equal about three, but
in practise  considerable available chlorine is lost from
the chloride of lime and the theoretical amount is nearer
one to four. At Torresdale the rate is about one to six to
one to seven. It is quite possible that *ith careless
handling and storing of blleach at small plants the figure is
nearzer one to eight than one to six.
8. No taste or odor appears in water treated with liquid
chlorine. MIaj. Darnell stat.e that at least ttwo parts of
lifquid chlorine, equivalent to sixteen pounds per million
gallons inmust be used to give the slightest taste to Potomac
river water. imr. Huy stated that wii7en using five pounds per
million gallons a slight taste was noticed in the laboratories
directly after dosing. On a test at t e Connecticut Hospital
for the Insane, Middleto,'n, Corn, fourteen pounds per million
gallons were used without its being noticed., It is quite
possible that if th-e dosage is heavy enough the watter will
rlave a taste o Firguring on a bais of six "to one, thirty
pounds of chloride of lime would be needed to correspornd
to 1Mr. Huy's five punnds; and eighty pounds to the amount
mentioned by Mr. Darnell, From a close examuination of the
literature on ehloride of lime the amount of chloride of lime
tha.t wvill give a taste to. water:may be estimated at from
seven to twenty pounds per million gallons of water, the
average figure will be from ten to twelve. At the above
rating this v:ouldi mean two,i pounds of liquid chlorine. A
ileavy overdose can $e given without complaint,



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000034.tif" SEQ="00000034" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="100" N="00000034">



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000035.tif" SEQ="00000035" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="828" N="18">
9, Liquid chlorine does not change the character of the
water by the introduction of lime salts. The lime salts will
usually amount to not over one part per million.
10. Liquid chlorine necessitates no labor cost, while
chloride of lime does. This is true, but a liquid chlorine
apparatus requires skilled supervision to be operated
properly and i not fool-proof.
11* Liquid -hlorine leaves no sludge,
12* Liquid chlorine will reduce the amount df alum needed
for bacterial removal. There can be no question but that,
in cases Where the water is comparatively clear and where
alwn is used chiefly for bacterial removal, if liquid
chlorine is used before filtration it vwill make a marked
saving in the cost of alum and in many cases  will not
only' pay for itself but will decrease th.e general cost of
the plant. A saving of one half grain per gallon or alum
at one cent per pound by the u e of one pound iiquid chlorine
pel million gallons at ten cents means a saving of 61 cents
per million gallons.
13*  The feed of liquid chlorine is regular from hour to
hour and the feed of chloride of lime varies constantly
Objections to JUse of Liquid Chlorine:- The chief
objecti:n to the use of liquid chlorine lies in the
concentrated energy of the material itself.  If liquid
chlorine is set free in small enclosures it will cause nausea.
With ordinary co-mnon  sense and judgment on the part of the
&amp;perator this is not likely to happen.'[he greatest danger
lies in faulty cylinders arid faulty valves, If the cylinder
valve were not turned off or if the cylinder leaks, it msut



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000036.tif" SEQ="00000036" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="100" N="00000036">



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000037.tif" SEQ="00000037" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="798" N="19">
ce got out into the open air and the chlorine allowed to
escape. Careful inspection of cylinders and va:lves must be
made. Liquid chlorine, whi.e.- it comes in contact with
moisture has a very corrosive action, but this has been
overcome by the use of hard rubber pipes and towers.
COSTS:- A- true comparison of costs carinnot be made
on present prices, as the European War has caused a
tremiendous inorea se in the cost of uthese ch emicals.
Probably one of' the'est compari sons un-rder normal
conditions is that furnished bMy Mr. West at t.e Torresdale
plant, tihich is as follows:
Chloride of lime costs us from $1.22 to "1o70 per
hundred pounds, the usual quotation was $1.34 and the average
figure $1. 40 
Taking $1,40 as a basis; we used during 1913 an
average of a little over twelve hundred pounds a day or
$16o.80 a day for powder.
Two laborers at 250 per hour were employed for
eight hours or $ 4.00. per day, making a total cost of
$20.80 per day exclusive of repairs, sample collecting or
laboratory analysis.
One hundred a.d eighty pounds of liquid chlorine
(the amount used April 10) would coqt at ten cents per pound
$18.00 per day. We have nowv passed the:r.or't conditions of
the year, February and MTJ"rch, w-henr we used 234 pounds a
cay or 4|23.40 cost.
It is expected that we will be able to reduce the
amount of liquid chlorine to at least  lb. per million
or 120 lbs. a day. We reached this Anril 22.



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000038.tif" SEQ="00000038" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="100" N="00000038">



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000039.tif" SEQ="00000039" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="818" N="20">
Some supervision and handling of cylinders is
required. At present the wrork is done by a $3.00 a day
mechanic who also keeps the pre-filters in repair. His
wages are charged against the pre-filter. A charge of
$1,00 a day 7woulld be fair for this service. This is partly
balanced'by the discontinuance of laborator'y analyses.
The labor cost during 1913 of $4,00 per day with
its output of 180,000,000 gallons amounted to but 2.2/
per million gallons. At Belmont and at Queen Lane the
labor cost of about $1.50 per day amounted to 3.8%f and
3/ respectively.
A-t the Roxboro plant the labor cost averaged over
$1.00 per day mixing; this at Lower Roxboro cost 10 per
million and at Upper Roxboro 6.7% per million.
The cost per million gallons at these plants during
1913 amounted to 16% to 18/, At one pound per million
gallons for liquid chlorine the cost would be 10%, or a
saving of 6f to 8%f per million gallons. On April 14 the
quantity used was reduced to j lb. per million or a cost
of 5%, a saving of 1 to 13% per million.
Belmont and Queen Lane are saving a labor cost of
3.8g and 3% per million gallons, Belmont is operating at
a rate of -i lb. and Queen Lane at j lb., or about 5% each.
On April 21 the amount used at Torresdale was
reduced to 4 lb. or a cost of $13.5~0 per day, exclusive of
a possible charge of $1.00 for labor*
In general the cost of the two processes should be
about equkl; if anything, liquid chlorine should prove  the
ch eap erz
In an article enmitled "The Cost of Water Purification



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000040.tif" SEQ="00000040" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="100" N="00000040">



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000041.tif" SEQ="00000041" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="821" N="21">
as affected by the War" publi.hed in the last numfber of the
Journal of the American Medical Association the following
i s given:
The prices of certain chemicals used in water
purification have risen greatly on account of the w.ar.The
actual amount of chemicals used in water purification plants
is insignificant from the standpoint of total consumption,
and at present the difficulty of the situation consists in
the fact tht  the waterworks officials are at the mercy of
thxe prices set by the needs of the manufacturers of
explosives, and of many industrial processes.'The normal
price of bleaching pqwder, for example, on the New York
Market, is about $1.25 to 41.35 per cwt., wihile the New
York wholesale quotation, Mar.4%, 1916, were from $10.50
toA$2.50 per cwt, Fortunately the advance in cost of
liquid chlorine has been much less(about double the normal
rate), so that chlorine disinfection may still be inexpensively carried out. It is to be hoped that waterworks
officials will be on their guard against any tendency towards
a lowering of the efficiency of purification because of the
rise in operating expense. Here if anywhere, the motto
"Safety First" has its place. Any saving effected in the
quantity of chlorine or other chemicals used is trivial
compared with the pos.;ible dangers of infection. The present
chemical situation suggests at most the substitution of
liquid chlorine for calcium hypochlorite, and where prattical,
of lime or iron sulphate for aluminum sulphate.
Wallace and Tiernan Co. Inc., of New York, give the
following comparisons as to cost of apparatus:
The average c:ost of a hypochlorite dosing device is



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000042.tif" SEQ="00000042" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="100" N="00000042">



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000043.tif" SEQ="00000043" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="825" N="22">
$3000O0, including mixing tank and machinery, constant level
boxes, orifices, etc,.  Thi snwould be typical of the cost for
a small plant,  with that for larger plants, higher in
proportion.
The price of chlorine control apparatus (based on
twelve types manufactured by this company), will run from
$350o00 to $1200.00 depending upon the "type and capacityof
the apparatus, and the conditions under w^hich it is to be
installed. A fair average figure for the cost of a chlorinator
would be $525.00.
On this basis the average chlorinator costs $225,00
more than the average hypochlorite dosing device.
CONCLUSIONS:-  From the previous c.mparisons of
efficiency, ease of application and costs it is evident that
liquid chlorine has many advanttages over chloride of lime
as a disinfectant in water purification. Nevertheless
chloride o:E' lime  still holds a valuable positio4 in this
field and cannot be cast asid e at this time. In discussing
the subject ME. C. A. Jennings wrote the following:
The automobile has replaced the h;orse for many
purposes but has not elimina'dd the horse. The writer feels
that liquid chlorine will supplant hypo in many plants now
using hypo, and that it w-ill be installed in a large number
of cities,, not now using any disinfectant, in preference
to hypo. However, he does not believe that hypo will be
eliminated. It will probably be used for smaller installations,
because of the smaller installation cost for the small and
medium sized plant, and will be used to quite an  extent f'r
sewage, where'the odor from the drum and the turbid solution



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000044.tif" SEQ="00000044" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="100" N="00000044">



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000045.tif" SEQ="00000045" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="814" N="23">
will not be objectionable.  He does not believe thatt all
the drawbacks laid to hypo are correctly placed. Many of the
troubles laid to the use of hypo are really due to lack of
attention; faulty design of treatment plant; incomplete
mixing of the solution; expecting from the use of hypo a
greater removal of bac teria than i s aeally practicable or
necessary, and the adjustmernt of the lose. to obtain this;maxin mum r emo val
Mr. Geo, C. Whipple expressed himself a.s follows:
It seems evident that both calciLu hypochlorite and liquid
chlorine may be relied upon to disinfect water supply and
that Lhe two processes are about on a par as to the efficiency
and freedom from taste and odor,, provided that both
chemicals areadded to the water in proper amounts and with
prope;r regularity. The advantages of liquid chlorine over
calcium hypochlorite appear to lie in the field of ecomoxiy
and convenience, It is not clear that in all cases liquid
chlorine is cheaper; Both chemicals probably have their
special adaptations and with time these will become defined..
From a comparison of a large amount of. data, one
is greatly impressed  by the very varied conditions under
which these chemicals are used. Some waters being turbid and
high, in organic matter while others are either filtered
supplies or relatively clear waters, Therefore an estimate
of tlhe amlounts necessary for any particular supply, by
corparision li th, ther suppliess i  impossible. The condition
of the tater changes from day to day not only in temperature
and ttirbidity but in dissolved organic matter which claims
first use of the nascent oxygen giv-n off so that no d~finite
dose can be s.sld to be correct for all times. Any



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000046.tif" SEQ="00000046" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="100" N="00000046">



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000047.tif" SEQ="00000047" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="571" N="24">
di sinrlfec tion process, snoiWAl oe uc(comipani ea mu/ iao oraC r ry
control.  In lth.i way.; ani econoimical and reliable dose m; ay
be applied according to tie condition ofi the water.
i th tne remnarkablae ad vancereentiute xi~dth tfhele
dis infecting; a..Fjenrcien int t''e past f~, years  and th  r;elative
eat e arid co  t Qf appli;ction to'watei slapplie  amnd sewaige
afilu eocic@  tere' is lo xose  for t yphoid oo'r O l ~hr. iater- orne
di,seas"e,.



</P>
<P><PB REF="00000048.tif" SEQ="00000048" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="100" N="00000048">



</P>
</DIV1>
</BODY>
</TEXT>