This web page is part of the Michigan Today Archive. To see this story in its original context, click here.


 

Sept. 29, 2003

Lost manufacturing jobs may be gone for good, U-M economist says


ANN ARBOR, Mich.—Despite new initiatives by the Bush administration to address long-time job declines in U.S. manufacturing, a University of Michigan economist says the outlook for American factory jobs remains bleak.

If output and productivity growth in the next five years matches the levels enjoyed during the economic boom of the last decade, manufacturing employment would only amount to 15.4 million jobs, down 13 percent from its 1990s peak of more than 17.6 million jobs in 1998—and up just 5 percent from today’s levels, says Donald Grimes, an economist at the U-M Institute of Labor and Industrial Relations, which is directed by the Michigan Business School and U-M School of Social Work.

“This is an optimistic scenario,” Grimes said. “Instead, I think we will be doing well if the manufacturing sector has as many jobs five years from now as it does today.”

Manufacturing jobs now number a little more than 14.5 million, down nearly 10 percent since the beginning of the recession in March 2001.

Grimes says employment in manufacturing has been in overall decline since 1979, when it reached its all-time high of 19.5 million jobs. Since then, he adds, the United States has lost about 5 million factory jobs—3 million since 1998.

“The acceleration of job losses recently reflects the impact of the recession, but more importantly the increased imports of apparel, textiles and leather products from Third World countries and the fact that manufacturing productivity is now growing relatively rapidly,” he said.

Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Grimes found that employment in most manufacturing sectors rose between 1993 and 1998, except among apparel, textiles, leather, paper, chemicals, and petroleum and coal products industries. But since 1998, all manufacturing industries have lost jobs:

· Apparel (down 56 percent)
· Leather and allied products (down 50 percent)
· Textile mills (down 40 percent)
· Primary metals (down 26 percent)
· Computer and electronic products (down 25 percent)
· Machinery (down 23 percent)
· Electrical equipment (down 22 percent)
· Printing activities (down 17 percent)
· Paper and paper products (down 16 percent)
· Fabricated metal products (down 16 percent)
· Transportation equipment (down 15 percent)
· Petroleum and coal products (down 14 percent)
· Plastics and rubber products (down 12 percent)
· Wood products (down 12 percent)
· Furniture products (down 10 percent)
· Chemicals (down 8 percent)
· Beverage and tobacco manufacturing (down 7 percent)
· Non-metallic mineral products (down 6 percent)
· Food manufacturing (down 2 percent)

Contact: Bernie DeGroat
Phone: (734) 936-1015 or 647-1847
E-mail: bernied@umich.edu

 
 
 
 
Michigan Today News-e is a new, monthly electronic publication for alumni and friends.

 

Talking about words


A CRISP acronym
'CRISP is a U-M family acronym,' says our language expert Richard W. Bailey. The Michigan Daily photo on the next page shows students in 1997 petitioning unsuccessfully to have alumnus James Earl Jones become the telephone voice of the 'CRISP Lady.'


MToday NewsE

Send this to a friend

Send us feedback

Read feedback

Send us alumni notes

Read alumni notes

 

 

Michigan Today
online alumni magazine

University Record
faculty & staff newspaper

MGoBlue
athletics

News Service
U-M news

University of Michigan
gateway



Site of the Month


"Campus Diversity, Student Voices"—New documentary
A new documentary featuring University of Michigan students explores the role of diversity in students’ lives at the University

 

  U-M Facts

  U-M Events

  Maps

 


Subscribe  |  Unsubscribe

Copyright 2003 University of Michigan News Service