This web page is part of the Michigan Today Archive. To see this story in its original context, click here.

Jan. 3, 2005

 

Why is Mona Lisa’s smile cracking?

 

DaVinci's Mona Lisa

ANN ARBOR, Mich.—Engineering and art came together for a University of Michigan student who used computer modeling to help set new guidelines for how the Smithsonian stores art—and believes he has even determined why the Mona Lisa keeps deteriorating despite its controlled environment.

The findings from mechanical engineering junior Evan Quasney's summer-long research internship at the Smithsonian Center for Materials Research and Education found that two long-time practices in art preservation actually cause more harm than good.  

The science-based findings may offend traditional art preservationists, says Marion Mecklenburg, the Smithsonian's senior research scientist, but the numbers don't lie. Mecklenburg, who led Quasney's research group, believes such computer modeling will change the way art is preserved in the future.

The Louvre

The 19-year-old Quasney believes he has developed a theory on why Leonardo da Vinci's famed Mona Lisa continues to deteriorate, despite rigid temperature and humidity controls in its chamber. Quasney used computer modeling and other inputs to theorize that the Mona Lisa is warping because it hangs on an exterior wall at its home in France's Louvre.

When the temperature falls outside, the wall temperature also drops.

"The relative humidity in the air was condensing on the wall because the wall was cooler, and dripping into the back of the panel and the wood, which was swelling and splitting," Quasney said.   In April, a month before Quasney started his internship at the Smithsonian, the Mona Lisa made headlines after its keepers discovered that the painting had warped alarmingly since its last examination.

In the larger body of findings, Quasney's computer model suggests that applying battens—a popular and long-time method of reducing warping in paintings by fixing sticks of dense wood to the painting's back—actually weakens the painting more than if it's allowed to bend naturally, and could cause cracks. Cradling is another method of holding a painting flat, and that causes severe warping.

"His findings really do show us how these paintings respond to temperature and relative humidity, it shows us which conservation methods can be very harmful, and it does help us set the museum environment," Mecklenburg said.

Quasney's model showed that applying a layer of gesso (a mixture of hide glue and calcium carbonate) to the reverse of panel paintings reduces their tendency to warp with changes in relative humidity, and they do not develop significant stresses that cause cracking. This, incidentally, was a recommendation made by painters more than 500 years ago.

New York Times article >

 

Contact: Laura Bailey
Phone: (734) 647-7087 or (734) 647-1848
E-mail: baileylm@umich.edu

 
 

 
Michigan Today News-e is a monthly electronic publication for alumni and friends.

 

MToday NewsE

Send this to a friend

Send us feedback

Read feedback

Send us alumni notes

Read alumni notes

 

Michigan Today
online alumni magazine

University Record
faculty & staff newspaper

MGoBlue
athletics

News Service
U-M news

Photo Services
U-M photography

University of Michigan
gateway


 

  • U-M Facts

  • U-M Events

  • Maps

 

Unsubscribe

Previous Issues