Work Description

Title: Turbulent flow over a backward-facing ramp with wall-mounted cubes Open Access Deposited

h
Attribute Value
Methodology
  • High-fidelity dataset from wall-resolved large eddy simulations of a spatially evolving turbulent boundary layer over a backward-facing ramp with wall-mounted cubes for a Reynolds number 19,600 based on the inlet boundary layer thickness and mean flow velocity is included here. The dataset contains three-dimensional velocity, pressure and Reynolds stress tensor fields for different flow configuration, namely different cube heights and positions. Also included are OpenFOAM flow solver-related setup files for each test case, that can be used to visualize and modify the provided flow fields in Paraview and related visualization tools. The data can further be processed using python scripts to convert it for processing in other tools like TecPlot. Please see the ‘BFR_LES_README.txt’ file for more information.
Description
  • Passive flow control devices, such as vortex generators (VGs), can effectively modulate the turbulent boundary layer flow near regions of adverse pressure gradients, but the interactions between the salient flow structures produced by VGs and those of the separated flow are not fully understood. In this study, a spatially evolving turbulent boundary layer interacting with a wall-mounted cube ahead of a backward-facing ramp is investigated using wall-resolved large-eddy simulations for a Reynolds number of 19,600, based on the inlet boundary layer thickness and freestream velocity. Different cube configurations are examined to isolate the effects of cube height and streamwise position.
Creator
Depositor
  • suyashtn@umich.edu
Contact information
Discipline
Funding agency
  • National Science Foundation (NSF)
  • Other Funding Agency
Other Funding agency
  • Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environmen - Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC), ASC-160041
Keyword
Citations to related material
  • Suyash Tandon, Kevin J. Maki, and Eric Johnsen, "Large-Eddy Simulations of Flow over a Backward-Facing Ramp with a Wall-Mounted Cube, " AIAAJ, Vol. 62, No. 9 (2024), pp. 3403-3417 doi: doi/abs/10.2514/1.J063803
Related items in Deep Blue Documents
  • Suyash Tandon, "Large-Scale Simulations of Complex Turbulent Flows: Modulation of Turbulent Boundary Layer Separation and Optimization of Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Next-Generation HPC Platforms." PhD diss., 2020. (https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/163206)
Resource type
Last modified
  • 09/11/2024
Published
  • 09/11/2024
Language
DOI
  • https://doi.org/10.7302/p7m9-zg97
License
To Cite this Work:
Tandon, S., Johnsen, E., Maki, K. (2024). Turbulent flow over a backward-facing ramp with wall-mounted cubes [Data set], University of Michigan - Deep Blue Data. https://doi.org/10.7302/p7m9-zg97

Relationships

This work is not a member of any user collections.

Files (Count: 3; Size: 22.7 GB)

Turbulent flow over a backward-facing ramp with wall-mounted cubes [Data set]

== Dataset Information ==

Date : May 24, 2023
Creator : S. Tandon, K. J. Maki, E. Johnsen
Contact : suyashtn@umich.edu
Funding : This work used the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment’s (Towns et al. (2014)) Stampede2 system at the Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC), which is supported by the National Science Foundation grant number ASC-160041.
Software: OpenFOAM® version 4.0 or newer

== Key Points ==

A few important highlights of the dataset are:
* Wall-resolved large eddy simulations (LES) is used to investigate turbulent flow over a backward-facing ramp with wall-mounted cubes.
* High-fidelity 3-D flow is computed to study the interaction between the turbulent structures near the cube (vortex generator) and the separated region.
* Dependence of turbulent structure and kinetic energy budget on the cube configuration (height and position) is studied.

== Summary ==

The separation of spatially evolving turbulent boundary layer flow near regions of adverse pressure gradients has been the subject of numerous studies. Although many studies have demonstrated the efficacy of passive flow control devices, such as vortex generators (VGs), in the separated region, the interactions between the salient flow structures produced by VGs and those of the separated flow are not fully understood. In this study, a spatially evolving turbulent boundary layer interacting with wall-mounted cubes ahead of a backward-facing ramp (BFR) is investigated using wall-resolved large-eddy simulations (LES) for a Reynolds number of 19,600 (based on the inlet boundary layer thickness δ0 and freestream velocity). The horseshoe vortex system observed around a cube entrains the freestream turbulent flow towards the plane of symmetry. These localized regions of high vorticity correspond to turbulent kinetic energy production regions, which effectively transfer energy from the freestream to the near-wall regions. While significantly lower levels of dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy than the production are observed in the outer flow regions of the horseshoe vortex and the induced counter-rotating flow, the spatial distribution of dissipation is similar to that of the turbulent kinetic energy. Two flow configurations with a single cube are examined to isolate and study the effects of cube height and streamwise position of the cube.

== Methodology ==

The data are output from LES conducted with open source CFD solver OpenFOAM®

== Dataset Contents ==

Two compressed .zip files are provided which contain different flow configurations considered for simulations and analysis of flow field. The folders and simulations are described below:
* no vg: BFR with no cube. The undisturbed spatially evolving turbulent boundary layer is simulated over the expansion section for approximately 100 flow overs, and dynamics of the separated flow over the ramp is analyzed
* single vg: BFR with a single wall-mounted cube. Three cube heights h/delta_0 = 0.2, 0.6 and 1 with fixed xvg = 3h and three cube positions xvg/h = 0,3 and 6 with fixed h/delta_0 = 0.6 are considered and dependence of turbulent transport on these parameters is investigated. The h/delta_0 = 0.6 with xvg/h = 3 is considered as baseline, and a total of 5 configurations are simulated for 100 flow overs each.

Structure of a test case:

├── 0
│   ├── U
│   ├── p
│   └── ...
├── 100
│   ├── U
│   ├── UMean
│   ├── UPrime2Mean
│   └── ...
├── constant
│   ├── polyMesh
│   ├── transportProperties
│   └── ...
├── system
│   ├── controlDict
│   ├── fvSolution
│   └── ...

1. 0: Contains the initial condition configuration for the flow fields—velocity (U), pressure (p), kinematic viscosity (nut) and modeled turbulent kinetic energy (k).
2. 100: Contains the 3D field values of velocity fields U and UMean, Reynolds stress tensor UPrime2Mean and pressure p. These field values are recorded after running the simulation for 100+ flow overs through the expansion section and quantities are time-averaged.
3. constant: The mesh files are held in this sub-directory. OpenFOAM® employs unstructured mesh, and specifications of neighbor, owner, faces, cell indices and point labels are recorded in separate files.
3.1 polyMesh: contains the description of the unstructured mesh
3.2 turbulenceProperties: provides specifications of turbulence models used
3.2 transportProperties: provides description of flow transport properties
4. system: Configuration and tuning parameters to specify the scheme selection and control simulation run-time are provided in different dictionary files.
4.1 controlDict: a dictionary to control the start time, end time, and other functionality of the simulations
4.2 fvSolution: a dictionary to provide options for solvers, preconditioners and smoothers
4.3 fvSchemes: a dictionary to specify the schemes for gradient calculations, time derivatives, interpolation, etc.

** NOTE **
With these four sub-directories provided for each of the 6 flow configurations, including both no vg and single vg, ideally one can use:
* OpenFOAM® (https://openfoam.org/ or https://www.openfoam.com/) utilities such as postProcess to evaluate other quantities of interest, like Q-criterion, vorticity, turbulent kinetic energy, etc.
* ParaView (https://www.paraview.org) to visualize the 3D dataset.
* Custom scripts that can help extract field quantities are available in this repository (https://github.com/suyashtn/scripts)
Use and access: This data set is made available under a Creative Commons Public Domain license (CC 4.0).

== Citation ==

To cite data: Tandon, S., Johnsen, E. and Maki, K. (2023). Turbulent flow over a backward-facing ramp
with wall-mounted cubes [Data set], University of Michigan - Deep Blue Data.

Download All Files (To download individual files, select them in the “Files” panel above)

Total work file size of 22.7 GB is too large to download directly. Consider using Globus (see below).



Best for data sets > 3 GB. Globus is the platform Deep Blue Data uses to make large data sets available.   More about Globus

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.