Work Description

Title: Demographically diverse crowds are typically not much wiser than homogeneous crowds Open Access Deposited

h
Attribute Value
Methodology
  • These data were collected via online surveys between 2015 and 2017. In studies 1-6, participants were recruited using Amazon Mechanical Turk. For study 7, participants were obtained via e-mails from the registrar’s office at a large Midwestern university. All studies have at least 50 participants.
Description
  • These studies assess the effect of social identity on judgement and are described in "Demographically diverse crowds are typically not much wiser than homogeneous crowds" (de Oliveira, S., & Nisbett, R. E. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018) and the article’s Supporting Information appendix. Some studies use a variety of questions to assess multiple social identity factors; the other studies are narrowed to particular social identity variables. Each study includes some type of estimation or prediction task, collects social identity variables, and asks participants to indicate their answer strategies. Study 1 is a trivia and prediction task based on football team fan identity. Study 2 reports on demographics plus political and religious identity and asks participants to predict vote percentages in presidential primaries. Study 3 participants estimate the percentage of Americans that support statements on various polarizing political views and give likelihood ratings for presidential candidates to win the Iowa caucus; a variety of identity questions are asked including political and religious identity. Study 4 includes demographics plus political and religious identity questions and asks participants to predict how the candidates would perform in the 2016 United States presidential election. Study 5 asks participants to guess the popularity rating of books that had either gender-specific or gender-neutral appeal, and also to rate their own interest in the books. Demographic-based social identity variables such as sex are included. Study 6 includes a wide variety of social identity variables and asks participants to estimate the likelihood of events occurring in the near future. Study 7 participants are from diverse national backgrounds and completed judgement tasks that predicted stock prices, Olympic performance, and news events outcomes. The data are generally interpretable when examined in conjunction with the target article. A new data file for Study 6 was uploaded on April 4, 2018 to include variables that were inadvertently left out of the original Study 6 file. A new data file for Study 7 was uploaded on April 6, 2018 to include variables that were inadvertently left out of the original Study 7 file. A codebook for this data set was added on April 6, 2018.
Creator
Depositor
  • sdeochen@umich.edu
Contact information
Discipline
Funding agency
  • National Science Foundation (NSF)
Keyword
Citations to related material
  • Demographically diverse crowds are typically not much wiser than homogeneous crowds. Stephanie de Oliveira Richard E Nisbett Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America vol. 115 issue 9 (2018) pp: 2066-2071. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717632115
Resource type
Last modified
  • 01/31/2020
Published
  • 01/11/2018
Language
DOI
  • https://doi.org/10.7302/Z2D50K5H
License
To Cite this Work:
de Oliveira, S., Nisbett, R. E. (2018). Demographically diverse crowds are typically not much wiser than homogeneous crowds [Data set], University of Michigan - Deep Blue Data. https://doi.org/10.7302/Z2D50K5H

Relationships

This work is not a member of any user collections.

Files (Count: 9; Size: 413 KB)

Download All Files (To download individual files, select them in the “Files” panel above)

Best for data sets < 3 GB. Downloads all files plus metadata into a zip file.



Best for data sets > 3 GB. Globus is the platform Deep Blue Data uses to make large data sets available.   More about Globus

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.