{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Wordnatomy","provider_url":"http:\/\/wordnatomy.wordpress.com","author_name":"fizzl","author_url":"http:\/\/wordnatomy.wordpress.com\/author\/fizzl\/","title":"Process Reflection","type":"link","html":"
Granted, the style of revisions for this class differs from my previous English classes, but I was surprised by how much I wanted to just start over when I was revising.\u00a0 I began the revision by trying to take the original and insert\/delete sections to better fit some of the advice received during office hours, and after about five minutes of that I just decided to start on a blank slate.\u00a0 That didn\u2019t mean I didn\u2019t take some parts of my original and put them into the revision, but I honestly have never really just started over when doing an assignment revision before.\u00a0 Given the size of the assignment, this actually seemed much easier than past revisions.<\/p>\n
However, the revision process still presented its own difficulties.\u00a0 For one, I took notes as to what I needed to do, but they were not entirely detailed enough and I wasn\u2019t actually quite sure what I needed to include in my revised version.\u00a0 For two (?), I wasn\u2019t actually sure if the revision was supposed to stay within the original word-count restraints as the original.\u00a0 I think the hardest time I had was trying to include everything that needed to be included without bloating my paper beyond what it was \u201csupposed\u201d to be.\u00a0 As a result, I found myself leaving a few things out.<\/p>\n
Additionally, I\u2019m still not entirely sure if I am making my point clearly enough.\u00a0 The whole idea of a \u201cprocess\u201d is very much a personal and abstract thing and I feel like I need to make it more clear to the reader just what exactly I mean; however, I don\u2019t know if this is more a self-demeaning issue or if it\u2019s actually real.\u00a0 I would like to get an outside opinion on what exactly it seems like my paper is saying and if it all ties together in a relatively coherent, cogent manner.<\/p>\n
Lastly, I can never tell if my metaphorical characters tie in well enough to make sense without breaking the flow of the paper.\u00a0 This is another thing I want an outside opinion on.\u00a0 I want to include them (as a means of broadening the scope to more than just writers) but I don\u2019t want to feel like the paper is constantly breaking from thought to bring in outside examples.\u00a0 I want these to feel like a natural inclusion to the argument.<\/p>\n"}