Show simple item record

Essays in Development Economics and Econometrics.

dc.contributor.authorGarlick, Robert J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-24T16:03:40Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2013-09-24T16:03:40Z
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.date.submitted2013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/100053
dc.description.abstractChapter 1 studies students' relative academic performance when they are tracked or randomly assigned to university dormitories. This shows how peer effects differ under different group assignment rules, speaking to the policy-relevant problem of how changes in group assignment policies can change aggregate outcomes. I find that mean GPA is lower under tracking than random assignment; low-scoring students have substantially lower GPAs under tracking but high-scoring students' GPAs are approximately equal under the two policies. These patterns are not explained by differences in students' baseline observed or unobserved characteristics or by dormitory characteristics. I then estimate a flexible education production function using random variation in dormitory peer groups. I find that this approach does not predict the magnitude of the treatment effect of tracking. This may reflect out of sample prediction problems or students' behavioral responses to the changed group assignment policy. Chapter 2 explores the price sensitivity of demand for school enrollment. I study a nationwide policy of primary and secondary school fee eliminations in South Africa, identifying the demand curves using controlled variation in the timing of fee elimination. Fee elimination has a very small effect on enrollment and grade attainment. These results are robust to accounting for variation in school-level characteristics, pre-treatment time trends between fee-eliminating and fee-charging schools, and student transfers between schools. The price insensitive demand is not explained by ceiling effects on enrollment, capacity constraints in schools, or negative effects of fee elimination on school resources. I argue that the pattern of results may reflect low valuation of additional years of education in fee-eliminating schools. Chapter 3 develops a framework for studying intertemporal economic mobility in terms of treatment effects. I define ``mobility treatment effects'' and establish sufficient conditions for assigning a causal interpretation to inter-group differences in mobility measures such as intergenerational income mobility. Even when causal interpretation is inappropriate, my framework decomposes mobility differences into the relative role of each observed characteristic. I show how estimation and inference use existing econometric results. I illustrate the methodology by analyzing mobility treatment effects from a classroom tracking experiment in Kenyan primary schools.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectPeer Effects Under Tracking and Random Group Assignmenten_US
dc.subjectPrice Sensitivity of School Enrollmenten_US
dc.subjectTreatment Effects on Economic Mobilityen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.subjectEconometricsen_US
dc.titleEssays in Development Economics and Econometrics.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePublic Policy and Economicsen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberSmith, Jeffrey Andrewen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberLam, David A.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberAngelucci, Manuelaen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberDinardo, John E.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberJacob, Brian Aaronen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelStatistics and Numeric Dataen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/100053/1/rgarlick_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.