On Settling Many Suits
dc.contributor.author | Blume, Lawrence E. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-11-14T23:20:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-11-14T23:20:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1983-04 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | MichU DeptE CenREST RSQE D50 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | K400 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/100636 | |
dc.description.abstract | A simple model is used to draw the following conclusions: the incentives for the defendant to settle are less in the many plaintiff game than in the single plaintiff game. In other words, there are suits that the defendant would settle against only one plaintiff that he would not settle were he contemplating actions by subsequent plaintiffs. this result clearly has implications for litigation strategy by plaintiffs. For example, class action suits allow the bundling of many suits by individual plalintiffs into one suit brought on behalf of all plaintiffs. The advantages of this and other bundling devices should be examined in light of the effect on defendants' expected return from bringing suit of changing favorably the defendant's incentive to settle. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Center for Research on Economic and Social Theory, Research Seminar in Quantitative Economics, Department of Economics, University of Michigan | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Discussion Paper | en_US |
dc.subject | Single Plaintiff Suit | en_US |
dc.subject | Multiple Plaintiff Suit | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior: General | en_US |
dc.title | On Settling Many Suits | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Economics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/100636/1/ECON112.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Economics, Department of - Working Papers Series |
Files in this item
-
Economics, Department of - Working Papers Series
Working papers from the Department of Economics
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.